Abstract
Objective
Scientific findings regarding the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the Arab world are scarce. We aimed to determine the prevalence of biopsy-proven celiac disease (BPCD) among pediatric patients with T1D from Jordan. We also assessed the possible predictors for developing CD in this cohort of patients and we compared T1D patients who developed BPCD with those who had positive CD serology but negative histology and/or fluctuating CD serology.
Methods
Celiac serology and duodenal biopsy results from 2012 to 2017 were collected from patients with T1D. The outcome of positive celiac serology and the risk factors for CD in T1D patients were investigated.
Results
A total of 538 children of which 278 boys (51.7%) were included in the study. The prevalence of positive serology and the diagnosis of BPCD in this cohort of T1D patients were 16.6 and 9.1% respectively. Eighty percent of those with BPCD were asymptomatic and 47% were diagnosed with CD at onset of T1D. Spontaneous normalization of celiac serology occurred in 23.6% of those with positive serology.
Conclusion
CD is prevalent in T1D pediatric patients from Jordan (9.1%). It is often asymptomatic and the majority of cases were diagnosed at onset or within 5 years of T1D diagnosis. Spontaneous normalization of CD serology occurred in some patients with T1D. Hence, a watchful follow-up is recommended in such patients.
Introduction
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is an immune-mediated disease that is known to be associated with other autoimmune conditions, most commonly thyroiditis and celiac disease (CD). While the prevalence of CD in the general population is estimated to be between 0.3 and 1% (1), it is significantly higher among patients with T1D due to a common genetic predisposition (2). The prevalence of CD ranges from 1 to 10% among children and adolescents with T1D (3, 4, 5, 6). A recent international comparative study with 53,000 children and adolescents with T1D across three continents reported a prevalence of CD of 3.5%, with rates ranging from 1.9% in the United States to 7.7% in Australia (7).
There are limited data on the prevalence of CD in Arab children with T1D. The prevalence in the reported studies from Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, West Algeria, Libya and Oman ranges between 4.9 and 11.3% (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). There are no data about the prevalence of biopsy-proven CD (BPCD) among children and adolescents with T1D from Jordan.
Due to this high prevalence of CD among pediatric patients with T1D, the potential clinical consequences and the fact that it is often asymptomatic, screening for positive CD serology is recommended for all patients with T1D soon after diagnosis (15, 16, 17, 18). Also, it is recommended that screening should be repeated at 2- and 5-year intervals or sooner if the patient is symptomatic or has a first-degree relative with CD, as it has been shown that positive celiac serology conversion is highest in the first 5–10 years after T1D diagnosis (3, 5, 17, 18). Recent studies have also shown a significant spontaneous normalization of celiac serology in patients with T1D despite continuing ingestion of a gluten-containing diet (19).
In this study we aim to determine, for the first time, the prevalence of BPCD among pediatric patients with T1D from Jordan by describing the development of celiac antibodies and BPCD in these patients, paying specific attention to timing of positive antibodies, disease development and spontaneous normalization of antibody titers. We also assess the possible predictors for developing CD in this cohort of patients and we compare T1D patients who developed BPCD with those who had positive CD serology but negative histology and or fluctuating CD serology.
Methods and patients
This is a mixed prospective and retrospective cohort study, based on review of medical files and electronic medical records and follow-up. All T1D patients attending the pediatric endocrinology clinics at the Jordan University Hospital (JUH) and the National Center for Diabetes Endocrinology and Genetics (NCDEG) (two major referral centers for T1D in Amman, Jordan) between 2012 and 2017 were included. Since the establishment of the pediatric diabetes clinics in these two centers in 2012, all T1D patients were screened for CD-related antibodies at onset of their disease and annually. In addition, all patients who presented at a later stage of their T1D were asked to provide any previous CD screening results. Those who were not previously screened underwent CD antibody screening. In the presence of a high CD antibody titer or clinical symptoms (whether gastrointestinal or extra-gastrointestinal), children were offered endoscopy for the histological diagnosis. Asymptomatic patients showing low CD antibody titers were invited to have a second serological determination after 4–6 months of following a gluten-containing diet and if still positive, they were offered endoscopy. Data collected for each patient included: date of birth, sex, date of T1D diagnosis, dates and results of CD serology tests, dates and results of duodenal biopsies, date of CD diagnosis, associated thyroid disease, family history of autoimmune diseases and symptoms of CD in patients with positive serology.
CD-related antibody determinations
In JUH, CD serology testing was determined by total serum IgA and anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG IgA) using a commercially obtained ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) kit, anti-huTransG (Generic Assays, Dahlewitz, Germany). In NCDEG, serology was determined by tTG IgA and tTG IgG using the same method. An ELISA cut-off value of less than 20 IU/mL was considered normal and equal or greater than 20 IU/mL, positive according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Before 2015, NCDEG used another commercial ELISA kit for which the cut-off level was 15 IU/mL. Serological autoantibody titers were recorded as multiplications of the upper limit of normal (ULN) to adjust for this cut-off difference.
Histological examination of duodenal biopsies
The majority of patients who were eligible for endoscopy underwent the procedure at JUH where at least four biopsy specimens in each patient were obtained including the duodenal cap. A pathologist interpreted the samples according to the histological criteria described in the Marsh classification (20). However, a minority of patients underwent the endoscopy in other hospitals and reports of the results were gathered. BPCD was diagnosed if the patient had Marsh ≥3 score in the duodenal biopsy. The last patient enrolled in the current study was in 2017 in order to have a follow-up of at least 1 year. Finally, the cohort comprised patients with T1D only and those with both T1D and CD. Those who had positive serum antibody serologies but negative biopsies or were followed without biopsies were designated as having a fluctuating serum serology. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committees in both JUH and NCDEG.
Statistical analysis
Continuous data are presented as mean ± s.d., and categorical data as frequency (%). Associations between categorical dependent variables and independent categorical variables were evaluated using chi-squared analysis. Possible predictors of CD were assessed using logistic regression (Entre method) analysis. Associations between categorical dependent variables and independent continuous variables were evaluated using independent t-test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Patients with type 1 diabetes
A total of 538 children (278 boys (51.7%)) were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 12.02 ± 3.94 years and the mean duration of T1D at the time of the study was 4.43 ± 2.65 years. The mean age at T1D diagnosis was 7.56 ± 3.64 years. Two children had a diagnosis of CD before T1D onset. The evolution of the cohort is shown in Fig. 1.
Study participants flow chart. *This patient was found to have BPCD (Marsh ≥3). **These two patients had infiltrative disease (Marsh 1) and were added to the group of patients with T1D and fluctuating CD serology. BPCD, biopsy-proven celiac disease; CD, celiac disease; T1D, type 1 diabetes; tTG IgA, anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A.
Citation: Endocrine Connections 8, 6; 10.1530/EC-19-0146
Study participants flow chart. *This patient was found to have BPCD (Marsh ≥3). **These two patients had infiltrative disease (Marsh 1) and were added to the group of patients with T1D and fluctuating CD serology. BPCD, biopsy-proven celiac disease; CD, celiac disease; T1D, type 1 diabetes; tTG IgA, anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A.
Citation: Endocrine Connections 8, 6; 10.1530/EC-19-0146
Study participants flow chart. *This patient was found to have BPCD (Marsh ≥3). **These two patients had infiltrative disease (Marsh 1) and were added to the group of patients with T1D and fluctuating CD serology. BPCD, biopsy-proven celiac disease; CD, celiac disease; T1D, type 1 diabetes; tTG IgA, anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A.
Citation: Endocrine Connections 8, 6; 10.1530/EC-19-0146
Diagnosis of CD in T1D patients
After excluding the two patients with the diagnosis of CD before the onset of T1D, the prevalence of patients with positive celiac serology at the end of the study period was 89/536 (16.6%). One patient had total serum IgA deficiency with gastrointestinal symptoms; at onset of her T1D and was proven to have CD by histology. Another patient refused endoscopy and was clinically considered to have CD due to persistence of high tTG IgA titer (>15 ULN) and the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms. Out of the 89 patients with positive serology for CD, 46 (51.7%) were diagnosed with BPCD. An additional 19 subjects did not undergo endoscopy and were followed clinically due to borderline tTG IgA titers and absence of symptoms (Fig. 1).
Histology results
Out of a total of 70 patients who underwent duodenal biopsy, Marsh ≥3 changes (various degrees of villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia and increased intraepithelial lymphocytosis) were present in 47 patients. An additional two patients had intraepithelial lymphocytosis with preserved villous architecture (Marsh 1). The remaining patients (21/70) showed negative histological features of CD. Of all participants, the proportion of patients with a final diagnosis of BPCD (Marsh ≥3) was 49/538 (9.1%).
Spontaneous normalization of CD serology
During follow up, 21 out of the 89 subjects who had positive CD serology became tTG IgA negative. Of these, eight underwent endoscopy and had negative results. Fifteen subjects (16.9%) continued to show fluctuating titers of tTG IgA. The percentage of patients who had positive CD serology and then showed spontaneous normalization of CD antibody titers in our cohort was 23.6%. Subjects with Marsh 1 histopathological results and subjects with spontaneous normalization of CD serology, in addition to the ones with negative biopsies and/or persistent positive CD serology constitute the group of T1D with fluctuating CD serology (42/89 (47.2%)).
Time from onset of T1D to final diagnosis of CD
Out of the 49 patients that were diagnosed with BPCD, 23 subjects (47%) were diagnosed with CD at the onset of their T1D diagnosis as a result of antibody screening. After excluding patients with BPCD diagnosed before and at onset of diabetes, 18/24 (75%) and 21/24 (87.5%) of patients had CD diagnosed by 3 and 5 years after onset of T1D, respectively (Table 1). In addition, 2 out of the 3 patients who were diagnosed with CD after 5 years of T1D onset had no previous documented serological screening for CD. One of them had chronic constipation and the other had short stature with no gastrointestinal symptoms.
Intervals between T1D diagnosis and BPCD diagnosis (N = 49).
| Interval | Before T1D Dx | At T1D Dx | 1st year | 2nd year | 3rd year | 4th year | 5th year | ≥6th year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases (%) | 2 (4.1) | 23 (47) | 8 (16.3) | 5 (10.2) | 5 (10.2) | 1 (2) | 2 (4.1) | 3 (6.1) |
This table shows the numbers of cases diagnosed with BPCD in relation to the timing of T1D diagnosis.
BPCD, biopsy-proven celiac disease; Dx, diagnosis; T1D, type 1 diabetes.
Symptoms and signs of CD in patients with T1D and CD
In patients having CD at onset or after T1D diagnosis, 20% displayed symptoms of CD, with 15.7% having gastrointestinal symptoms and 4.3% having non-gastrointestinal symptoms (short stature and recurrent unexplained hypoglycemia).
Comparison between patients with T1D only and patients with T1D and CD
The characteristics of T1D patients with and without CD are shown in Table 2. Mean age at T1D diagnosis was not statistically significantly different between patients with T1D only compared to those diagnosed with both T1D and CD (7.67 ± 3.65 vs 6.61 ± 3.43 years, P = 0.057). In addition, there was no significant difference in the current age between the two groups (12.04 ± 3.93 vs 11.90 ± 3.99 years, P = 0.816). However, the duration of diabetes was significantly shorter in patients with T1D only compared to those diagnosed with both T1D and CD (4.35 ± 2.58 vs 5.31 ± 3.18 years, P = 0.046). Different variables were assessed as possible predictors of CD. Two variables showed statistical significance (Table 3). In multivariate analysis, each one-fold increase in the tTG IgA above ULN increased the likelihood of having CD by 22%. In the univariate analysis, children who were diagnosed with T1D aged between 5 and 10 years had a 52% less likelihood of having CD compared to those who were diagnosed at a younger age (less than 5 years).
Characteristics of T1D patients with and without CD (N = 536).
| T1D only (N = 488, 91%) | T1D+CD (N = 48, 9%) | P* value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 236 (48.4) | 26 (54.2) | 0.443 |
| Presence of hypothyroidism | 18 (3.7) | 4 (8.3) | 0.122 |
| Family history of autoimmune disease | 173 (35.5) | 22 (45.8) | 0.154 |
| Age at diagnosis of T1D (years) | 0.062 | ||
| <5 | 126 (25.8) | 20 (41.7) | |
| 5–10 | 263 (53.9) | 20 (41.7) | |
| >10 | 99 (20.3) | 8 (16.7) |
*Using chi-square.
CD, celiac disease; T1D, type 1 diabetes.
Possible predictors of celiac disease in type 1 diabetes patients.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P* | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Maleα | ||||||
| Female | 1.26 | 0.70–2.29 | 0.443 | 0.98 | 0.36–2.68 | 0.971 |
| Presence of hypothyroid disease | ||||||
| Noα | ||||||
| Yes | 2.37 | 0.77–7.32 | 0.133 | 1.51 | 0.21–10.67 | 0.680 |
| tTG IgA (ULN)∞ | 1.23 | 1.12–1.35 | <0.001 | 1.22 | 1.11–1.34 | <0.001 |
| Age at T1D diagnosis (years) | ||||||
| <5α | ||||||
| 5–10 | 0.48 | 0.25–0.92 | 0.028 | 0.470 | 0.15–1.48 | 0.198 |
| >10 | 0.51 | 0.22–1.20 | 0.124 | 0.440 | 0.11–1.71 | 0.236 |
αReference; ∞ Folds more than the upper normal level of tissue transglutaminase IgA; *Using logistic regression.
We also evaluated the differences between the characteristics of children with T1D and CD compared to those with fluctuating celiac serology (Table 4). Both the age at diabetes diagnosis and the duration of diabetes were significantly different between the two groups. Children with CD were diagnosed with diabetes at a younger age and had a longer duration of diabetes than those with fluctuating celiac serology. Twenty-six of children (54%) with BPCD were females, compared to 21 (50%) of the group with fluctuating celiac serology. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.693).
Characteristics of patients with T1D and celiac disease and those with fluctuating celiac serology (N = 90).
| Variables | T1D with celiac disease (N = 48) | T1D with fluctuating celiac serology (N = 42) | P* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Age at T1D diagnosis (years) | 6.61 ± 3.43 | 8.40 ± 3.41 | 0.015 |
| Duration of T1D (years) | 5.31 ± 3.18 | 3.79 ± 1.80 | 0.006 |
| Current age (years) | 11.90 ± 3.99 | 12.26 ± 3.36 | 0.654 |
*Using independent t-test.
T1D, type 1 diabetes.
Discussion
The prevalence of positive tTG IgA serology and BPCD in our cohort of T1D patients was 16.6 and 9.1% respectively. The prevalence of positive CD serology in the general pediatric population in Jordan is estimated to be 1.5% using tTG IgA and 0.8% using both tTg IgA and anti endomysial IgA antibodies (21). This confirms that pediatric patients with T1D from Jordan have almost a 10 times higher risk of developing positive CD serology than the general population. In addition, Albatyneh et al. estimated the prevalence of positive tTG IgA in 138 patients with T1D from south Jordan to be 6.5% (22). Our pediatric cohort showed more than twice that number, which could be due to a larger patient cohort and the fact that our centers cover referrals from all over the country. To our knowledge, this is the first report about the prevalence of BPCD in pediatric patients with T1D from Jordan. Our findings still lie within the reported prevalences worldwide (1–10%) and in Arab countries (4.9–11.3%), though at the upper end of this range (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). This relatively high prevalence is probably due to a predisposing genetic susceptibility in our population. This needs further investigation.
The timing of CD diagnosis in our patients was mostly at onset and within 3–5 years of their T1D diagnosis. This finding is similar to other cohorts from different parts of the world namely, Sweden, Australia and Italy (3, 5, 23). However, no data are available from the Arab world to describe the relationships between both; the onset of positive CD serology and BPCD diagnosis, and the time of T1D diagnosis as reports from the Arab world were cross-sectional reporting prevalence only (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Hence, our findings suggest that the international guidelines proposing CD screening for patients with new onset T1D and close follow-up in the first 5 years (17, 18) also apply to our geographical region.
The strong association between T1D and CD is associated with a common genetic susceptibility attributed to specific shared alleles, with HLA-DR3-DQ2 and DR4-DQ8 haplotypes increasing the risk of both diseases (24, 25). Interestingly, it has been shown that children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to T1D and CD develop CD-associated antibodies mostly at a younger age or at the same age at which they develop diabetes-associated auto-antibodies (26). However, clinical T1D is usually diagnosed before CD. In fact, CD diagnosis often occurs from screening at onset of the diabetes and during follow-up (5, 23). Some authors hypothesized that in genetically susceptible patients; untreated (latent or silent) CD could be an immunological trigger and induce diabetes due to gluten as a driving antigen. However, this has not been confirmed as reports show no correlation between the duration of gluten exposure in adult CD and the risk of autoimmune disorders (31, 32). Hence, gluten is currently considered as a modifier rather than a determinant of the pathogenesis of T1D, facilitating the progression of other dietary factors to the lamina propria, to activate the autoimmune response against beta cells (27).
Some groups have investigated the association between the occurrence of CD and the age at T1D diagnosis. Two large pediatric studies from Australia and Italy have shown that diagnosis of T1D at a younger age (<5 years) increased the risk of developing CD, after a longer diabetes duration, than when T1D presented at an older age (5, 27). However, this was not a consistent finding, as other reports found no difference (3, 28, 29). In our cohort, there was a tendency for younger patients at T1D onset to have higher risk of developing CD but the difference was marginal.
In addition, several studies reported a difference in CD prevalence in T1D patients with gender; the prevalence being higher in girls in two studies (27, 33), higher in boys in three studies (3, 29, 34) and not different in two further studies (5, 28). We did not find any difference in gender susceptibility.
The classical clinical features of CD include gastrointestinal and extra-gastrointestinal manifestations such as chronic or intermittent diarrhea and/or constipation, chronic abdominal pain/distention, flatulence, anorexia, dyspeptic symptoms as well as anemia, vitamin deficiencies, poor linear growth, delayed puberty or recurrent aphthous ulceration (35, 36). These symptoms and deterioration in glycemic control or hypoglycemia should alert the health care professional to investigate and exclude CD. However, many pediatric T1D patients have asymptomatic CD and the diagnosis was made as a result of CD antibody screening (15, 16) as was the case in our patients. Current recommendations advise that children with CD should start a gluten-free diet under the supervision of an experienced pediatric dietitian. Barriers to adherence to such a diet include the burden of a second disease, high cost and unavailability of gluten-free products, problems with sensory acceptance, inadequate support from family and peers, absence of symptoms following ingestion of gluten, and lack of knowledge of the health-related complications of gluten ingestion (16).
The recommendation of a small bowel biopsy for all T1D patients with positive CD serology has been recently challenged by several investigators who demonstrated spontaneous normalization of CD serology over varying periods of time in 20–35% of cases (19, 37). The presence of CD symptoms and younger age at onset of T1D were the strongest predictors of positive CD serology, also endomyseal antibody positivity and a tTG IgA antibody level greater than the seven- to eightfold the ULN value were strong predictors of BPCD diagnosis (19). We observed spontaneous normalization of CD serology in approximately a quarter of the patients who initially tested positive. The strongest predictor for BPCD was the high tTG IgA titer levels.
In conclusion, CD is prevalent in T1D patients from Jordan (9.1%). It is often asymptomatic and around half the cases were diagnosed as a result of screening at onset of T1D. After that, CD is diagnosed mostly within the first 5 years after T1D diagnosis. Spontaneous normalization of CD serology was observed in 23.6% of patients who mostly had borderline elevations of tTG IgA with no symptoms. Hence, a watchful follow-up is recommended in such patients.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the deanship of academic research, University of Jordan (grant number 138/2016-2017).
References
- 1↑
Bai JC, Fried M, Corazza GR, Schuppan D, Farthing M, Catassi C, Greco L, Cohen H, Ciacci C, Eliakim R, et al.World Gastroenterology Organisation global guidelines on celiac disease. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 2013 47 . (https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e31827a6f83)
- 2↑
Camarca ME, Mozzillo E, Nugnes R, Zito E, Falco M, Fattorusso V, Mobilia S, Buono P, Valerio G, Troncone R, et al.Celiac disease in type1 diabetes mellitus. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2012 38 10. (https://doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-38-10)
- 3↑
Larsson K, Carlsson A, Cederwall E, Jönsson B, Neiderud J, Jonsson B, Lernmark A, Ivarsson SA & Skåne Study Group. Annual screening detects celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes 2008 9 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00367.x)
- 4↑
Salardi S, Volta U, Zucchini S, Fiorini E, Maltoni G, Vaira B, Cicognani A. Prevalence of celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus increased in the mid-1990s: an 18-year longitudinal study based on anti-endomysial antibodies. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2008 46 . (https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31815d697e)
- 5↑
Pham-Short A, Donaghue KC, Ambler G, Chan AK, Craig ME. Coeliac disease in Type 1 diabetes from 1990 to 2009: higher incidence in young children after longer diabetes duration. Diabetic Medicine 2012 29 e286–e289. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03720.x)
- 6↑
Fröhlich-Reiterer EE, Huber J, Katz H, Suppan E, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Deutschmann A, Demel U, Acham-Roschitz B, Weinhandl G, Ambros-Rudolph CM, et al.Do children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus have a higher frequency of parietal cell antibodies than healthy controls? Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2011 52 . (https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181fedb2a)
- 7↑
Craig ME, Prinz N, Boyle CT, Campbell FM, Jones TW, Hofer SE, Simmons JH, Holman N, Tham E, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, et al.Prevalence of celiac disease in 52,721 youth with type 1 diabetes: international comparison across three continents. Diabetes Care 2017 40 . (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2508)
- 8↑
Saadah OI, Al-Agha AE, Al Nahdi HM, Bokhary RY, Bin Talib YY, Al-Mughales JA, Al Bokhari SM. Prevalence of celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus screened by anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody from Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 2012 33 .
- 9↑
Al-Hussaini A, Sulaiman N, Al-Zahrani M, Alenizi A, El Haj I. High prevalence of celiac disease among Saudi children with type 1 diabetes: a prospective cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterology 2012 12 180. (https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-180)
- 10↑
Al-Ashwal AA, Shabib SM, Sakati NA, Attia NA. Prevalence and characteristics of celiac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 2003 24 .
- 11↑
Mankaï A, Ben Hamouda H, Amri F, Ghedira-Besbes L, Harbi A, Tahar Sfar M, Sahloul Essoussi A, Jeddi M, Ghedira I. Screening by anti-endomysium antibodies for celiac disease in Tunisian children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique 2007 31 . (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-8320(07)89413-9)
- 12↑
Boudraa G, Hachelaf W, Benbouabdellah M, Belkadi M, Benmansour FZ, Touhami M. Prevalence of coeliac disease in diabetic children and their first-degree relatives in west Algeria: screening with serological markers. Acta Paediatrica 1996 412 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14254.x)
- 13↑
Ashabani A, Abushofa U, Abusrewill S, Abdelazez M, Tucková L, Tlaskalová-Hogenová H. The prevalence of coeliac disease in Libyan children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 2003 19 . (https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.333)
- 14↑
Al-Sinani S, Sharef SW, Al-Yaarubi S, Al-Zakwani I, Al-Naamani K, Al-Hajri A, Al-Hasani S. Prevalence of celiac disease in Omani children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross sectional study. Oman Medical Journal 2013 28 . (https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2013.73)
- 15↑
Sun S, Puttha R, Ghezaiel S, Skae M, Cooper C, Amin R & North West England Paediatric Diabetes Network. The effect of biopsy-positive silent coeliac disease and treatment with a gluten-free diet on growth and glycaemic control in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 2009 26 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02859.x)
- 16↑
Sud S, Marcon M, Assor E, Palmert MR, Daneman D, Mahmud FH. Celiac disease and pediatric type 1 diabetes: diagnostic and treatment dilemmas. International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology 2010 2010 161285. (https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/161285)
- 17↑
Mahmud FH, Elbarbary NS, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Holl RW, Kordonouri O, Knip M, Simmons K, Craig ME. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes 2018 19 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12740)
- 18↑
American Diabetes Association. 12. Children and adolescents: standards of medical care in diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care 2018 41 S126–S136. (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S012)
- 19↑
Castellaneta S, Piccinno E, Oliva M, Cristofori F, Vendemiale M, Ortolani F, Papadia F, Catassi C, Cavallo L, Francavilla R. High rate of spontaneous normalization of celiac serology in a cohort of 446 children with type 1 diabetes: a prospective study. Diabetes Care 2015 38 . (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2890)
- 20↑
Marsh MN, Crowe PT. Morphology of the mucosal lesion in gluten sensitivity. Baillière’s Clinical Gastroenterology 1995 9 . (https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3528(95)90032-2)
- 21↑
Nusier MK, Brodtkorb HK, Rein SE, Odeh A, Radaideh AM, Klungland H. Serological screening for celiac disease in schoolchildren in Jordan. Is height and weight affected when seropositive? Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2010 36 16. (https://doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-36-16)
- 22↑
Albatayneh EM, Alnawaiseh NA, Al-Sarayreh SA, Al-saraireh YM, Al-Zayadneh EM, Abu-lobbad MA. Serologic screening of celiac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2018 8 . (https://doi.org/10.14740/jem507w)
- 23↑
Barera G, Bonfanti R, Viscardi M, Bazzigaluppi E, Calori G, Meschi F, Bianchi C, Chiumello G. Occurrence of celiac disease after onset of type 1 diabetes: a 6-year prospective longitudinal study. Pediatrics 2002 109 . (https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.109.5.833)
- 24↑
Smyth DJ, Plagnol V, Walker NM, Cooper JD, Downes K, Yang JH, Howson JM, Stevens H, McManus R, Wijmenga C, et al.Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2008 359 . (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807917)
- 25↑
Kozhakhmetova A, Wyatt RC, Caygill C, Williams C, Long AE, Chandler K, Aitken RJ, Wenzlau JM, Davidson HW, Gillespie KM, et al.A quarter of patients with type 1 diabetes have co-existing non-islet autoimmunity: the findings of a UK population-based family study. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 2018 192 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13115)
- 26↑
Simell S, Hoppu S, Simell T, Ståhlberg MR, Viander M, Routi T, Simell V, Veijola R, Ilonen J, Hyöty H, et al.Age at development of type 1 diabetes- and celiac disease-associated antibodies and clinical disease in genetically susceptible children observed from birth. Diabetes Care 2010 33 . (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1217)
- 27↑
Cerutti F, Bruno G, Chiarelli F, Lorini R, Meschi F, Sacchetti C & Diabetes Study Group of the Italian. Younger age at onset and sex predict celiac disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: an Italian multicenter study. Diabetes Care 2004 27 . (https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.6.1294)
- 28↑
Glastras SJ, Craig ME, Verge CF, Chan AK, Cusumano JM, Donaghue KC. The role of autoimmunity at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in the development of thyroid and celiac disease and microvascular complications. Diabetes Care 2005 28 . (https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.9.2170)
- 29↑
Uibo O, Heilman K, Rägo T, Shor R, Paal M, Metsküla K, Tillmann V, Uibo R. Symptomless celiac disease in type 1diabetes: 12-year experience in Estonia. Pediatrics International 2010 52 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02955.x)
- 30
Pocecco M, Ventura A. Coeliac disease and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a causal association? Acta Paediatrica 1995 84 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13583.x)
- 31↑
Viljamaa M, Kaukinen K, Huhtala H, Kyronpalo S, Rasmussen M, Collin P. Coeliac disease, autoimmune diseases and gluten exposure. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2005 40 . (https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520510012181)
- 32↑
Guariso G, Conte S, Presotto F, Basso D, Brotto F, Visonà Dalla Pozza L, Pedini B, Betterle C. Clinical, subclinical and potential autoimmune diseases in an Italian population of children with coeliac disease. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2007 26 . (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03526.x)
- 33↑
Poulain C, Johanet C, Delcroix C, Lévy-Marchal C, Tubiana-Rufi N. Prevalence and clinical features of celiac disease in 950 children with type 1 diabetes in France. Diabetes and Metabolism 2007 33 . (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2007.06.004)
- 34↑
Crone J, Rami B, Huber WD, Granditsch G, Schober E. Prevalence of celiac disease and follow-up of EMA in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2003 37 . (https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200307000-00011)
- 35↑
Telega G, Bennet TR, Werlin S. Emerging new clinical patterns in the presentation of celiac disease. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2008 162 . (https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.38)
- 36↑
McGowan KE, Castiglione DA, Butzner JD. The changing face of childhood celiac disease in North America: impact of serological testing. Pediatrics 2009 124 . (https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2373)
- 37↑
Waisbourd-Zinman O, Hojsak I, Rosenbach Y, Mozer-Glassberg Y, Shalitin S, Phillip M, Shamir R. Spontaneous normalization of anti tissue transglutaminase antibody levels is common in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2012 57 . (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-2016-0)
