Abstract
Testicular adrenal rest tumours (TARTs) are benign adrenal-like testicular tumours that frequently occur in male patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Recently, GATA transcription factors have been linked to the development of TARTs in mice. The aim of our study was to determine GATA expression in human TARTs and other steroidogenic tissues. We determined GATA expression in TARTs (n = 16), Leydig cell tumours (LCTs; n = 7), adrenal (foetal (n = 6) + adult (n = 10)) and testis (foetal (n = 13) + adult (n = 8)). We found testis-like GATA4, and adrenal-like GATA3 and GATA6 gene expressions by qPCR in human TARTs, indicating mixed testicular and adrenal characteristics of TARTs. Currently, no marker is available to discriminate TARTs from LCTs, leading to misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment. GATA3 and GATA6 mRNAs exhibited excellent discriminative power (area under the curve of 0.908 and 0.816, respectively), while immunohistochemistry did not. GATA genes contain several CREB-binding sites and incubation with 0.1 mM dibutyryl cAMP for 4 h stimulated GATA3, GATA4 and GATA6 expressions in a human foetal testis cell line (hs181.tes). Incubation of adrenocortical cells (H295RA) with ACTH, however, did not induce GATA expression in vitro. Although ACTH did not dysregulate GATA expression in the only human ACTH-sensitive in vitro model available, our results do suggest that aberrant expression of GATA transcription factors in human TARTs might be involved in TART formation.
Introduction
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a genetic disorder in which adrenocortical steroid synthesis is impaired due to a deficiency in particular steroidogenic enzymes, most often steroid 21-hydroxylase (CYP21A2). A wide range of the male CAH patients from 12.5% up to 94% are reported to develop testicular adrenal rest tumours (TARTs), which are an important cause of infertility (1, 2). TARTs are benign tumours with steroidogenic characteristics, located near the mediastinum testis (1, 3). Until now, the aetiology and origin of TARTs have remained uncertain. TARTs were originally thought to arise from adrenal rest cells, based on the presence of adrenal characteristics, such as expression of adrenal enzymes and receptors (4, 5). However, recently we also described testicular characteristics of TARTs (6). This has shifted the hypothesis toward a more pluripotent steroidogenic cell type as the origin of TARTs (6), possibly from cells originating in the urogenital ridge or adrenogonadal primordium.
Besides exhibiting both adrenal and testicular characteristics, TARTs also share morphological similarities with steroid-producing testicular Leydig cells. As a consequence, it is difficult to discriminate TARTs from Leydig cell tumours (LCTs). Both TARTs and LCTs are rare tumours (7). Although rare entities, several cases of LCTs in CAH patients have been described (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Discrimination between LCTs and TARTs is important as these require different treatment strategies. TARTs are detected using ultrasound or MRI investigation. Currently, TARTs will only be surgically removed from the testis when pain complaints are present (3), while LCTs will be surgically removed using a testis-sparing procedure or total orchiectomy (7). No single marker is available yet to accurately discriminate TARTs from LCTs, increasing the chance of misdiagnosis and consequently incorrect treatment, of which at least 2 cases have been reported in literature (14, 15).
GATA transcription factors are involved in development (by regulating cell fate specification) and differentiation in all eukaryotic organisms. These factors are able to bind to a consensus DNA element, WGATAR, known as the GATA motif (16, 17). Historically, GATA transcription factors are divided into two families: GATA1, GATA2 and GATA3 are classified as haematopoietic factors, while GATA4, GATA5 and GATA6 are classified as endodermal factors. Their expression is also described in almost all foetal and adult tissues, and they are involved in adrenogonadal development. Three GATA factors (GATA 1, 4, 6) are expressed in the somatic cell population of the testis, while GATA3 is expressed in the adrenal medulla (reviewed in Viger and coworkers 18).
A possible relation between the expression of GATA transcription factors during adrenogonadal development and TART development was proposed in commentaries in the study of Padua and coworkers (19) by Heikinheimo and coworkers (20) and Pihlajoki (21). Padua and coworkers (19) developed a mouse model lacking both GATA4 and GATA6 expressions in steroidogenic cells. These mice suffer from adrenal aplasia, and female mice die within days after birth. However, male mice survive because of corticoid production by adrenal-like cells in the testes, which Heikinheimo (20) and Pihlajoki (21) proposed might be similar to TART cells. Interestingly, GATA genes contain cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) sites, and cAMP induces expressions of GATA4 and GATA6 in gonadal cell lines (22, 23, 24). Levels of ACTH, the receptor of which signals via cAMP, are raised in CAH patients, due to lack of negative feedback on the Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal axis, caused by low or absent cortisol levels due to the adrenal enzyme deficiency. Furthermore, ACTH levels are associated with the occurrence of TARTs (25, 26, 27). Therefore, we hypothesized that dysregulation of GATA transcription factors by increased ACTH levels in utero might be involved in the aetiology of TARTs.
The aim of our study was therefore to determine the expression of GATA transcription factors in TARTs and other steroidogenic tissues. We determined their discriminative potential to discern TARTs from LCTs, and studied the role of cAMP and ACTH in the aetiology of TARTs in vitro.
Methods
GATA expression analysis in human material
Tissues and patients
Sixteen TART samples from 8 adult CAH patients (tumour left and right testis) were previously collected as described by Claahsen and coworkers (3, 5) (informed consent was obtained). Paraffin-embedded material for immunohistochemistry was available for all tumours, while frozen material for RNA isolation was available for 12 samples. Additionally, 2 frozen histologically proven TART samples from one anonymous CAH patient were obtained. Frozen material of normal testis (n = 8), normal adrenal (n = 10) and benign LCT (n = 7) was obtained. Furthermore, paraffin-embedded material was available for 4 benign LCTs and 3 metastases of malignant LCTs. These coded (identifiable anonymous) testis tissues, adrenal tissues, benign LCTs, metastases of malignant LCTs and TART samples were obtained from the Pathology and Urology departments and used in accordance with the Code of Conduct of the Federation of Medical Scientific Societies in the Netherlands (http://www.federa.org/codes-conduct; research approved by institutional review board: CMO Radboudumc #2016-2977 and CMO-nr 2004/007).
To study the aetiology of TARTs, we also included foetal adrenal and testis tissues. Six human foetal adrenals (first and second trimesters) and cDNA from 13 foetal testis tissues (second trimester) were obtained from the MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh. Tissues were obtained following elective termination of pregnancy and anonymized. Women gave informed consent in accordance with national guidelines (42), and ethical approval was obtained from the Lothian Research Ethics Committee.
RNA isolation
Frozen tissue sections (at least 10 × 20 µm) or cultured cells were used for RNA isolation (Total RNA Purification kit, Norgen, Thorold, Canada) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were treated with DNase (RNase-free DNase set, Qiagen). RNA concentrations and purity were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer.
Reverse transcription and qPCR
0.1 µg (foetal testis), 0.2 µg (first-trimester adrenal) or 0.5 µg (second trimester adrenal and adult samples) of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol with a 2720 Thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) in a final volume of 20 µL. Gene-specific primers of GATA1, GATA3, GATA4 and GATA6 were self-designed (Supplementary Table 1, see section on supplementary data given at the end of this article). For qPCR, the cDNA of adult samples was diluted 5 times, while the cDNA of foetal samples was diluted 20 times, and 2 µL was added to 7.5 µL IQSYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories), in a total amount of 15 µL on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories). As foetal testis cDNA was not DNase-treated, a non-RT control was used to determine genomic DNA contamination.
Immunohistochemistry
GATA3 immunostaining was performed using a standardized protocol optimized for the localization of GATA3 in urothelial carcinoma (antibody L50-823, 1:50 dilution, Biocare Medical/Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands). Kidney sections were used as positive control. GATA6 immunostaining (sc-9055; 1:200 dilution, SantaCruz Biotechnology) was performed manually including negative control sections with only primary antibody diluent. All sections were visualized with VisionTek (Sakura, Tokyo, Japan).
Regulation of GATA transcription factors
Cell culture
The Hs181.tes cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CRL-7131), while the H295RA cell line was obtained from the University of Michigan (28). Cells were grown as a monolayer culture, although the H295RA cells tend to grow in clumps. Media for Hs181.tes cells consisted of DMEM with 4.5 g/L glucose with l-glutamine (Lonza; Leusden, Netherlands), whilst DMEM/F12 (Lonza) was used for H295RA cells. Both media were supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% antibiotics (penicillin-streptomycin 10,000 U/mL; Gibco). Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified 95% air/5% CO2 atmosphere. Medium was changed 2–3 times a week and Hs181.tes cells were passaged when confluent using 0.25% trypsin (BD Diagnostic Systems, Breda, The Netherlands), while for H295RA cells, 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) was used.
Dibutyryl cAMP and ACTH studies
Hs181.tes and H295RA cells were washed, harvested and plated (1:6 dilution) into a 6-well plate (Costar, Corning Life Sciences). After 24 h, cells were starved overnight using serum-free medium (Hs181.tes) or low-serum experimental medium (1% FBS; H295RA). RNA was isolated after cells were treated with 0.1 mM dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP; Sigma) for either 30 min, 4 h or not treated at all. ACTH incubation experiments were only performed in the H295RA cells, as Hs181.tes cells are insensitive to ACTH. RNA was isolated after cells were not treated or treated with 2 or 10 nM ACTH (Synacthen, Radboudumc Pharmacy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) for either 30 min, 4 h or 24 h.
Data analysis
Gene expression
mRNA expression of all genes was calculated using the delta Ct method (2−∆Ct). All values were normalized to the corresponding HPRT value (29). Data were transferred to GraphPad Prism 5 and IBM SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc.) for further analyses. Differences between different tissues and conditions were tested for statistical significance with non-parametric tests. To determine the diagnostic properties of GATA in discriminating TARTs from LCTs, Mann–Whitney U was performed and following Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. The area under the curve (AUC) represents the probability that the outcome correctly classifies the tissue as TART or benign LCT (range 0.5 (no accuracy) to 1 (prefect accuracy)). To determine the role of GATA in the aetiology of TARTs, a comparison between TARTs and testes (foetal and adult), TARTs and adrenals (foetal and adult) was made. Furthermore, expressions in foetal tissues were compared with each other (adrenal vs testis), as well as expressions in adult tissues (adrenal vs testis). Also, expressions in foetal and adult testis, and foetal and adult adrenal tissues were compared. These comparisons were analysed with the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. Gene expression analyses within cell culture studies were also compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. Values of P ≤ .05 (*) or P ≤ .01 (**) or P ≤ .001 (***) were considered statistically significant.
Protein immunohistochemistry
IHC stainings for GATA3 and GATA6 in TARTs and LCTs were visually examined by two independent investigators (MAMvZ, ME). GATA3 and GATA6 were scored based on pseudoquantative histoscore: intensity of staining was recorded as negative, weak, moderate or strong. Furthermore, an estimation of the percentage of positive cells was made. For GATA3, only nuclear staining was scored as GATA3 staining is already validated for urothelial cell carcinoma, indicating only nuclear staining as a positive reaction. In contrast, as GATA6 staining is still experimental, we considered both nuclear and cytoplasmic stainings as positive. For GATA3, nuclear reactivity of the tubular cells of the kidney was used as external positive control for the staining procedure. For GATA6, tissue sections without primary antibody were used as a negative control for the staining procedure. Cytoplasmic staining in GATA6 was corrected for any lipofuscin present by comparing the negative control directly with the GATA6 staining. In the cases of staining heterogeneity, the highest level was reported. Staining scores were compared between the two investigators (MAMvZ, ME) and both agreed on reported (consensus) scores.
Results
Adrenal and testicular expression levels of GATA transcription factors in TARTs
To test whether expression of GATA1, GATA3, GATA4 and GATA6 is a marker of different tissues or disease states, qPCR was performed (Fig. 1). Separate analyses were performed to determine their discriminative potential between TARTs and LCTs (Fig. 1 underlined significance) and to determine their role in the aetiology of TARTs by comparison with foetal and adult testis and adrenal tissues (Fig. 1 non-underlined significance).
Expression of GATA1 was significantly higher in foetal adrenals compared to foetal testes (28.4-fold, P ≤ 0.01) and adult adrenals (61.1-fold, P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 1A).
GATA3 expression was maximal in foetal adrenals, which was 190-fold higher compared to foetal testis tissues (P ≤ 0.001). GATA3 expression was also significantly higher in adult adrenals compared to adult testes (73.7-fold, P ≤ 0.001), and expression in TARTs was significantly higher compared to foetal (17.8-fold, P ≤ 0.05) and adult (26.9-fold, P ≤ 0.01) testes (Fig. 1B).
Gene expression of GATA4 was significantly higher (32.4-fold) in TARTs compared to adult adrenals (P ≤ 0.01). Significantly higher GATA4 expression (33.5-fold) was found in foetal testis tissues compared to foetal adrenal tissues (P ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 1C).
GATA6 expression levels were 16.6-fold higher in adult adrenals compared to adult testes (P ≤ 0.001), while GATA6 expression in TARTs was higher compared to foetal (6.3-fold, P ≤ 0.05) and adult (9.3-fold, P ≤ 0.05) testes (Fig. 1D).
The results of the gene expression analyses are summarized in Fig. 2: GATA3 and GATA6 are highly expressed in foetal and adult adrenal tissues, while GATA4 is highly expressed in foetal and adult testis tissues. TARTs express high levels of GATA3, GATA4 and GATA6, indicating adrenal- and testis-like expression patterns of GATA transcription factors.
GATA3 and GATA6 mRNA levels can discriminate TARTs from LCTs, while protein levels cannot
Next, we compared GATA expression and their discriminative potential between TART and LCT tissues, as there is currently no single marker that can distinguish between these two pathologies. GATA3 gene expression was 15.8-fold higher expressed in TART compared to LCT tissues (P ≤ 0.01 Fig. 1B), and GATA6 was 16.5-fold higher expressed in TARTs compared to LCTs (P ≤ 0.05 Fig. 1D), while GATA4 showed no significant difference between TARTs and LCTs (Fig. 1C). To determine the discriminative potential in distinguishing TARTs from LCTs based on GATA3 or GATA6 gene expression, we performed ROC analyses. GATA3 showed excellent discriminative potential to differentiate TARTs from LCTs with an AUC of 0.908, while GATA6 showed good discriminative potential with an AUC of 0.816 (Fig. 3).
To enhance the clinical applicability of GATAs as TART biomarkers and to determine which cells express GATA, we set out to assess GATA3 and GATA6 expressions using immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissues. Protein expression was analysed in TARTs (n = 16), benign LCTs (n = 4) and metastases of malignant LCTs (n = 3). GATA3 protein expression was undetectable in all TART samples as well as in all LCTs, while the tubular cells of kidney sections (positive control) showed nuclear expression (Fig. 4). In TARTs and LCTs, GATA6 protein expression was heterogeneous (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2), while expression was absent in negative control samples (Fig. 4). Both nuclear and cytoplasmic stainings were observed, with a high variability in intensity and percentage of positive cells. TARTs and benign LCTs show similar intensity and percentage of cells with GATA6 protein expression, while protein expression of GATA6 in metastases of malignant LCTs is almost absent as there are only very few cells with staining (Fig. 4).
GATA transcription factors and their possible role in the aetiology of TARTs
We hypothesized that prenatal exposure of foetal steroidogenic pluripotent cells to ACTH might induce TARTs via GATA transcription factors. ACTH acts on the ACTH receptor (MC2R), a G-coupled protein, using cAMP as a second messenger. Indeed, one or multiple CREB-binding sites occur inside the gene body or up to 10 kb upstream of the transcription start site of multiple GATA genes (http://sabiosciences.com/chipqpcrsearch.php?app=TFBS), suggesting that cAMP could be a GATA expression-inducing second messenger, involved in de- and/or upregulation of GATAs in TARTs.
Incubation of a foetal testis cell line (hs181.tes) with 0.1 mM of dbcAMP for 4 h showed a moderate increase in gene expressions of GATA3, GATA4 and GATA6, although this did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 5A). However, there is no in vitro model of foetal testis cells expressing MC2R. Therefore, we used an ACTH-sensitive adrenocortical cell line (H295RA).
ACTH incubation with 2 nM (results not shown) or 10 nM (Fig. 5B) for 30 min, 4 h or 24 h increased MC2R and CYP11B1 gene expressions (positive controls), indicating that the system is indeed responsive to ACTH. However, no altered gene expressions for GATA3, GATA4 or GATA6 were found.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of GATA transcription factors in human TARTs. TARTs expressed both testicular (GATA4) and adrenal (GATA3 and GATA6) characteristics, thereby confirming our previous findings of both adrenal and testicular features of TARTs (6). Furthermore, differences in GATA3 and GATA6 mRNA expression levels might be used to discriminate TARTs (high) from LCTs (low expression), indicated by good AUCs (>0.8) in ROC analyses, although at the protein expression level, immunohistochemistry did not discriminate. In addition, as long-term exposure to elevated ACTH levels is linked to occurrence of TART (25, 26, 27), we hypothesized that (prenatal) exposure of (primordial) steroidogenic cells in the testes to ACTH might induce TARTs via deregulation of GATA transcription factors. Human foetal testis cells indeed show increased GATA expression after incubation with cAMP. However, adrenocortical cells (the only human ACTH-sensitive model available) did not show increased expression after ACTH incubation.
Although interesting to again find both adrenal- and testis-like characteristics of TARTs, this expression pattern does not correspond to the expression pattern observed in the adrenal-like cells of the GATA4/GATA6 double-knockout mice described earlier (19). The steroidogenic cells in the double-knockout mice should not express GATA4 and GATA6, as the model eliminated expression in all steroidogenic cells. In addition, the adrenal-like cells in these mice lacked HSD17B3 and INSL3 expressions, whereas these genes are expressed in human TARTs (19). Therefore, the observed gene expression patterns of adrenal-like cells found in these mice do not resemble the observed gene expression pattern of human TART.
We assessed the potential of GATA transcription factors as differential diagnostic tools to discriminate TARTs from LCTs, which are difficult to distinguish due to their morphological resemblance. Misdiagnosis can have profound consequences for the treatment of a patient with a testicular tumour (8, 11). Therefore, a clinical need for differential diagnostic markers that can differentiate between both pathologies exists. Bilateralism of the tumours (25, 30), presence of Reinke crystals (1, 5, 25, 31, 31, 32, 33, 34) and expressions of synaptophysin, Inhibin α, CD56, androgen receptor, DLK1, INSL3, CYP11B1, CYP21A2 and MC2R (33, 34, 35, 36) have all been studied as potential markers, but none of these markers individually can reliably discriminate TARTs from LCTs. We found significantly higher gene expressions of GATA3 and GATA6 in TARTs compared to LCTs with good discriminative potential. This suggests that measurement of these genes may be used in a diagnostic setting as a discriminative marker between TART and LCT tissues. To improve the usefulness of these markers in the clinic and to determine which cells express GATA, we determined protein expressions of GATA3 and GATA6 on paraffin-embedded tumour samples using standard immunohistochemical techniques. GATA3 protein expression, however, was undetectable in TARTs and LCTs. On the other hand, GATA6 protein expression was heterogeneous both within and between TART, benign LCT and metastases of malignant LCT tissue samples. We observed high variability in the location, intensity of staining and percentage of GATA6-positive cells. We identified very low expression of GATA6 in metastases of malignant LCTs, which might reflect a change in the status in the primary tumour cells promoting invasion. Nevertheless, GATA6 expression is heterogeneously expressed within and between TARTs and benign LCTs, and it can therefore not be used as a discriminatory biomarker for these pathologies.
We also determined GATA expression in human foetal adrenal and testis tissues. GATA1 was the only GATA gene in which a significant change in expression was identified between foetal and adult adrenal tissues. We found GATA4 expression in foetal and adult testis tissues, and GATA6 expression in foetal and adult adrenal. Previous findings are in agreement with our data. Viger and coworkers summarized all known literature on GATA expression in adrenogonadal development, mainly based on mice models (18). However, as we studied human TARTs, we will focus on reported expression in human tissues. Ketola and coworkers found GATA4 and GATA6 mRNAs and protein expressions in human foetal testis tissues, although a decreasing trend with advanced foetal development was observed for GATA6 expression (37). In foetal testis tissues, GATA4 was the predominantly expressed GATA gene. Jiminez and coworkers found GATA6 expression in human adult adrenal tissues, but no GATA4 expression (38). This is in agreement with Kiiverii and coworkers who showed GATA4 and GATA6 expressions in human foetal adrenal, but only GATA6 mRNA and protein expression in human adult adrenal (39). In summary, and in correspondence with known literature, we found expression of GATA4 in foetal and adult testis tissues, and GATA6 expression in foetal and adult adrenal tissues. In addition, we found GATA3 expression in foetal and adult adrenal tissues.
We found high relative gene expression levels of GATA3, GATA4 and GATA6 in TARTs, suggesting that dysregulation of these transcription factors is involved in the aetiology of TARTs. GATA genes contain one or several CREB sites and previously cAMP was described to induce GATA4 and GATA6 expressions in the gonadal cell lines MSC-1, mLT and MA-10 (22, 23, 24). We therefore stimulated foetal testis cells with cAMP and indeed found moderate increase in expressions of GATA3, 4 and 6. The ACTH receptor (MC2R) signals via cAMP and elevated ACTH levels are present in CAH patients and associated with the development of TARTs (25, 26, 27). We hypothesized that dysregulation of GATA expression by ACTH in foetal steroidogenic cells could eventually lead to the formation of TARTs. Regretfully, no human foetal cell lines are available that express functional MC2R. Human cell lines, in general, tend to have low (functional) ACTH receptor expression, although several adrenocortical cell lines, including H295R cells, are known to have at least moderate expression of MC2R (40, 41). ACTH responsiveness in H295R cells was increased by over-expression of MRAP, resulting in the H295RA cell line, the only human ACTH-sensitive cell line available (28). We are aware of the limitation of using a differentiated cell line as a model for the involvement of ACTH in foetal steroidogenic cells. In the present study, we demonstrated that ACTH does not influence GATA expression in H295RA cells. Timing of ACTH exposure might play an important role in GATA dysregulation. Therefore, dysregulation of GATA might still be a key player in the formation of TART and is possibly regulated by ACTH prenatally.
In conclusion, testis-like expression of GATA4 and adrenal-like expressions of GATA3 and GATA6 were observed in TARTs, suggesting that dysregulation of GATA transcription factors in a pluripotent foetal cell is involved in TART formation. Furthermore, gene expression of GATA transcription factors showed good discriminative potential to differentiate TARTs from LCTs, but further studies have to be performed establishing thresholds in less-invasive material such as blood or urine to be of applicable use.
Supplementary data
This is linked to the online version of the paper at http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0215.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Funding
This work was supported by the International Fund Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (2016 IFCAH grant).
References
- 1↑
Stikkelbroeck NM, Otten BJ, Pasic A, Jager GJ, Sweep CG, Noordam K & Hermus AR. High prevalence of testicular adrenal rest tumors, impaired spermatogenesis, and Leydig cell failure in adolescent and adult males with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2001 86 5721–5728. (doi:10.1210/jcem.86.12.8090)
- 2↑
Jaaskelainen Voutilainen R. Long-term outcome of classical 21-hydroxylase deficiency: diagnosis, complications and quality of life. Acta Paediatrica 2000 89 183–187. (doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2000.tb01213.x)
- 3↑
Claahsen-van der Grinten HL, Otten BJ, Takahashi S, Meuleman EJ, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Sweep FC & Hermus AR. Testicular adrenal rest tumors in adult males with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: evaluation of pituitary-gonadal function before and after successful testis-sparing surgery in eight patients. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007 92 612–615. (doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1311)
- 4↑
Clark RV, Albertson BD, Munabi A, Cassorla F, Aguilera G, Warren DW, Sherins RJ & Loriaux DL. Steroidogenic enzyme activities, morphology, and receptor studies of a testicular adrenal rest in a patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1990 70 1408–1413. (doi:10.1210/jcem-70-5-1408)
- 5↑
Claahsen-van der Grinten HL, Otten BJ, Sweep FC, Span PN, Ross HA, Meuleman EJ & Hermus AR. Testicular tumors in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency show functional features of adrenocortical tissue. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007 92 3674–3680. (doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0337)
- 6↑
Smeets EE, Span PN, van Herwaarden AE, Wevers RA, Hermus AR, Sweep FC, Claahsen-van der Grinten HL. Molecular characterization of testicular adrenal rest tumors in congenital adrenal hyperplasia: lesions with both adrenocortical and Leydig cell features. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2015 100 E524–E530. (doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2036)
- 7↑
Rich MA & Keating MA. Leydig cell tumors and tumors associated with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Urologic Clinics of North America 2000 27 519–528. (doi:10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70099-9)
- 8↑
Davis JM, Woodroof J, Sadasivan R & Stephens R. Case report: congenital adrenal hyperplasia and malignant Leydig cell tumor. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 1995 309 63–65. (doi:10.1097/00000441-199501000-00010)
- 9↑
Inaba H, Suzuki S, Shigematsu S, Shinomiya K, Ohfusa H, Shimojo Y, Uehara T & Hashizume K. Leydig cell tumor and malignant lymphoma in a patient with nonclassical 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Internal Medicine Journal 2009 48 601–605. (doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1733)
- 10↑
Santoriello A, Benevento R, Petronella P, Perna G & Canonico S. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia and Leydig cell tumor of testis. Case report and review of literature. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia 2010 81 445–448.
- 11↑
Charfi N, Kamoun M, Feki Mnif M, Mseddi N, Mnif F, Kallel N, Ben Naceur B, Rekik N, Fourati H & Daoud E et al. Leydig cell tumor associated with testicular adrenal rest tumors in a patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 11beta-hydroxylase deficiency. Case Reports in Urology 2012 2012 648643. (doi:10.1155/2012/648643)
- 12↑
Entezari P, Kajbafzadeh AM, Mahjoub F & Vasei M. Leydig cell tumor in two brothers with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 11-beta hydroxylase deficiency: a case report. International Urology and Nephrology 2012 44 133–137. (doi:10.1007/s11255-010-9890-9)
- 13↑
Ferrari M, Raber M, Capitanio U, Russo G, Ferrario M, Rizzo N, Freschi M, Rigatti P & Montorsi F. Leydig cell tumor of the spermatic cord in an adolescent affected by congenital adrenal hyperplasia. International Journal of Urology 2012 19 954–956. (doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03074.x)
- 14↑
Ali HH, Samkari A & Arabi H. Testicular adrenal rest ‘tumor’ or Leydig cell tumor? A report of a challenging case with literature review. Avicenna Journal of Medicine 2013 3 15–19. (doi:10.4103/2231-0770.112789)
- 15↑
Vukina J, Chism DD, Sharpless JL, Raynor MC, Milowsky MI & Funkhouser WK. Metachronous bilateral testicular leydig-like tumors leading to the diagnosis of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (adrenogenital syndrome). Case Reports in Pathology 2015 2015 459318. (doi:10.1155/2015/459318)
- 17↑
Laverriere AC, MacNeill C, Mueller C, Poelmann RE, Burch JB, Evans T. GATA-4/5/6, a subfamily of three transcription factors transcribed in developing heart and gut. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1994 269 23177–23184.
- 18↑
Viger RS, Guittot SM, Anttonen M, Wilson DB & Heikinheimo M. Role of the GATA family of transcription factors in endocrine development, function, and disease. Molecular Endocrinology 2008 22 781–798. (doi:10.1210/me.2007-0513)
- 19↑
Padua MB, Jiang T, Morse DA, Fox SC, Hatch HM & Tevosian SG. Combined loss of the GATA4 and GATA6 transcription factors in male mice disrupts testicular development and confers adrenal-like function in the testes. Endocrinology 2015 156 1873–1886. (doi:10.1210/en.2014-1907)
- 20↑
Heikinheimo M, Pihlajoki M, Schrade A, Kyronlahti A & Wilson DB. Testicular steroidogenic cells to the rescue. Endocrinology 2015 156 1616–1619. (doi:10.1210/en.2015-1222)
- 21↑
Pihlajoki M, Farkkila A, Soini T, Heikinheimo M & Wilson DB. GATA factors in endocrine neoplasia. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 2016 421 2–17. (doi:10.1016/j.mce.2015.05.027)
- 22↑
Ketola I, Rahman N, Toppari J, Bielinska M, Porter-Tinge SB, Tapanainen JS, Huhtaniemi IT, Wilson DB & Heikinheimo M. Expression and regulation of transcription factors GATA-4 and GATA-6 in developing mouse testis. Endocrinology 1999 140 1470–1480. (doi:10.1210/endo.140.3.6587)
- 23↑
Heikinheimo M, Ermolaeva M, Bielinska M, Rahman NA, Narita N, Huhtaniemi IT, Tapanainen JS & Wilson DB. Expression and hormonal regulation of transcription factors GATA-4 and GATA-6 in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 1997 138 3505–3514. (doi:10.1210/endo.138.8.5350)
- 24↑
Tremblay JJ & Viger RS. Transcription factor GATA-4 is activated by phosphorylation of serine 261 via the cAMP/protein kinase a signaling pathway in gonadal cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003 278 22128–22135. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M213149200)
- 25↑
Rutgers JL, Young RH & Scully RE. The testicular “tumor” of the adrenogenital syndrome. A report of six cases and review of the literature on testicular masses in patients with adrenocortical disorders. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 1988 12 503–513. (doi:10.1097/00000478-198807000-00001)
- 26↑
Claahsen-van der Grinten HL, Dehzad F, Kamphuis-van Ulzen K & de Korte CL. Increased prevalence of testicular adrenal rest tumours during adolescence in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormone Research in Paediatrics 2014 82 238–244. (doi:10.1159/000365570)
- 27↑
Yu MK, Jung MK, Kim KE, Kwon AR, Chae HW, Kim DH & Kim HS. Clinical manifestations of testicular adrenal rest tumor in males with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism 2015 20 155–161. (doi:10.6065/apem.2015.20.3.155)
- 28↑
Nanba K, Chen AX, Turcu AF & Rainey WE. H295R expression of melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein results in ACTH responsiveness. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 2016 56 69–76. (doi:10.1530/JME-15-0230)
- 29↑
de Kok JB, Roelofs RW, Giesendorf BA, Pennings JL, Waas ET, Feuth T, Swinkels DW & Span PN. Normalization of gene expression measurements in tumor tissues: comparison of 13 endogenous control genes. Laboratory Investigation 2005 85 154–159. (doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700208)
- 30↑
Kim I, Young RH & Scully RE. Leydig cell tumors of the testis. A clinicopathological analysis of 40 cases and review of the literature. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 1985 9 177–192.
- 31
Bonaccorsi AC, Adler I & Figueiredo JG. Male infertility due to congenital adrenal hyperplasia: testicular biopsy findings, hormonal evaluation, and therapeutic results in three patients. Fertility and Sterility 1987 47 664–670. (doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59119-5)
- 32↑
Srikanth MS, West BR, Ishitani M, Isaacs H Jr, Applebaum H & Costin G. Benign testicular tumors in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1992 27 639–641. (doi:10.1016/0022-3468(92)90466-K)
- 33↑
Ashley RA, McGee SM, Isotaolo PA, Kramer SA & Cheville JC. Clinical and pathological features associated with the testicular tumor of the adrenogenital syndrome. Journal of Urology 2007 177 546–549. (doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.041)
- 34↑
Wang Z, Yang S, Shi H, Du H, Xue L, Wang L, Dong Y & Han A. Histopathological and immunophenotypic features of testicular tumour of the adrenogenital syndrome. Histopathology 2011 58 1013–1018. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03861.x)
- 35↑
Iczkowski KA, Bostwick DG, Roche PC & Cheville JC. Inhibin A is a sensitive and specific marker for testicular sex cord-stromal tumors. Modern Pathology 1998 11 774–779.
- 36↑
Lottrup G, Nielsen JE, Skakkebaek NE, Juul A & Rajpert-De Meyts E. Abundance of DLK1, differential expression of CYP11B1, CYP21A2 and MC2R, and lack of INSL3 distinguish testicular adrenal rest tumours from Leydig cell tumours. European Journal of Endocrinology 2015 172 491–499. (doi:10.1530/EJE-14-0810)
- 37↑
Ketola I, Toppari J, Vaskivuo T, Herva R, Tapanainen JS & Heikinheimo M. Transcription factor GATA-6, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and apoptosis-related proteins Bcl-2 and Bax in human fetal testis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2003 88 1858–1865. (doi:10.1210/jc.2002-021647)
- 38↑
Jimenez P, Saner K, Mayhew B & Rainey WE. GATA-6 is expressed in the human adrenal and regulates transcription of genes required for adrenal androgen biosynthesis. Endocrinology 2003 144 4285–4288. (doi:10.1210/en.2003-0472)
- 39↑
Kiiveri S, Liu J, Westerholm-Ormio M, Narita N, Wilson DB, Voutilainen R & Heikinheimo M. Differential expression of GATA-4 and GATA-6 in fetal and adult mouse and human adrenal tissue. Endocrinology 2002 143 3136–3143. (doi:10.1210/endo.143.8.8939)
- 40↑
Mountjoy KG, Bird IM, Rainey WE & Cone RD. ACTH induces up-regulation of ACTH receptor mRNA in mouse and human adrenocortical cell lines. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 1994 99 R17–R20. (doi:10.1016/0303-7207(94)90160-0)
- 41↑
Noon LA, Franklin JM, King PJ, Goulding NJ, Hunyady L & Clark AJ. Failed export of the adrenocorticotrophin receptor from the endoplasmic reticulum in non-adrenal cells: evidence in support of a requirement for a specific adrenal accessory factor. Journal of Endocrinology 2002 174 17–25. (doi:10.1677/joe.0.1740017)
- 42↑
Polkinghorne J. Review of the Guidance on the Research Use of Fetuses and Fetal Material. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1989.