Abstract
Context
Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) has a relatively high prevalence in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). There is still a lack of relevant studies to analyze the influence of ACS on diagnosing and managing PA.
Objective
To evaluate the influence of ACS on image–adrenal venous sampling (AVS) correlation and the postoperative results.
Methods
This was a retrospective study using the Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation database from July 2017 to April 2020, with 327 PA patients enrolled. A total of 246 patients were included in the image–AVS analysis. Patients who had undergone unilateral adrenalectomy and a 12-month follow-up were included in the postoperative analysis.
Results
Sixty-five patients (26.4%) had ACS. The image–AVS discordance rate was higher in the ACS group compared to the non-ACS group (75.4% (n = 49) vs 56.4% (n = 102); odds ratio (OR) = 2.37 (CI: 1.26–4.48); P = 0.007). The complete biochemical success rate was higher in the non-ACS group than that in the ACS group (98.1% (n = 51) vs 64.3% (n = 9); OR = 28.333 (CI: 2.954–271.779); P = 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, ACS was the only factor associated with lower biochemical success (OR = 0.035 (CI: 0.004–0.339), P = 0.004).
Conclusion
PA patients with ACS have higher image–AVS discordance rate and worse biochemical outcomes after surgery. ACS was the only negative predictor of postoperative biochemical outcomes. Further studies and novel biomarkers for AVS are crucial for obtaining better postoperative outcomes in PA patients with ACS.
Introduction
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a disease characterized by excess aldosterone production of the adrenal glands and is considered the most common form of mineralocorticoid excess (1). It is also the most common cause of secondary hypertension, accounting for about 5–15% of patients with newly diagnosed hypertension (2, 3, 4).
PA can be generally subtyped into unilateral disease (including primarily aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs), and unilateral adrenal hyperplasia in rare cases) and bilateral disease (mainly bilateral hyperplasia) (5, 6). Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) has been regarded as the standard for differentiating between the two disease subtypes (3, 7, 8, 9), in contrast to cross-sectional imaging studies (computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)). Adrenalectomy has consequently been established as the treatment of choice for unilateral disease.
Recently, there has been a growing focus on a special group with cortisol co-secretion (10) or autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) (11). The prevalence of ACS is approximately 20% in patients with PA (12, 13). The clinical and laboratory manifestations present as a spectrum from very low cortisol secretion, to subclinical Cushing syndrome, to overt Cushing syndrome (14). Recent studies have shown a significantly increased cardiovascular risk and impaired glucose metabolism in these patients (15, 16). However, hypercortisolism status may be overlooked since most patients do not present with typical signs and symptoms of classic Cushing syndrome. Another significant concern has been raised regarding the potential influence of elevated cortisol levels in these patients, which may alter the lateralization of AVS and increase the possibility of image–AVS disagreement (14, 17, 18). Furthermore, the postoperative clinical and biochemical outcomes associated with these patients have not been well established.
In this study, we focused on how the presence of ACS in PA patients may influence clinical presentation by affecting the concordance between imaging and AVS evaluation methods. Postoperative clinical and biochemical resolution status was also analyzed within different subgroups.
Methods
Study population
This retrospective study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the National Taiwan University Hospital.
From the Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation (TAIPAI) database, adult (age over 18 years) patients diagnosed with PA who underwent AVS at the National Taiwan University Hospital between July 2017 and April 2020 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, laboratory data, imaging studies, and postoperative records were carefully reviewed from the clinical database. The diagnosis of PA was confirmed by the following three criteria: i) elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) > 35 (ng/dL)/(ng/mL/h), ii) TAIPAI score > 60% (19), and iii) nonsuppressed aldosterone with a plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) > 16 (ng/dL) after saline administration (in seated posture) or ARR > 35 (ng/dL)/(ng/mL/h) after captopril administration (20). The TAIPAI score is a probability score developed by Wu et al. to assess the likelihood of PA (19). The equation for calculating the TAIPAI score incorporates various factors, including PAC, plasma renin activity, ARR, body mass index, sex, serum potassium level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with clinically overt Cushing syndrome were excluded from the study. None of the included patients received any kind of glucocorticoid medication before testing.
Cross-sectional imaging studies
Before AVS, all patients underwent imaging examination, including CT or MRI. All images were reviewed and confirmed by two radiologists with 15 and 5 years of experience, respectively. An abnormal adrenal gland was identified by nodular thickening, bulkiness, or the presence of any nodular lesion (21). The imaging results were then divided into three groups: bilateral normal appearance, unilateral abnormality, and bilateral abnormalities.
AVS
All AVS procedures were performed by an interventional radiologist with 15 years of experience and in the morning to avoid bias resulting from the circadian rhythms of aldosterone secretion (22). Selectivity index (SI) was defined as the ratio of cortisol in the adrenal vein to that in the inferior vena cava (CAV/CIVC). Successful cannulation of the adrenal vein was defined as SI ≥ 2.0 in nonstimulated AVS (8). Patients with cannulation failure on either side were excluded. The lateralization index (LI) was calculated as the aldosterone–cortisol concentration ratio between the dominant and nondominant adrenal veins ((A/C)dominant AV/(A/C)nondominant AV). The lateralization of PA was confirmed by an LI value ≥ 2.0 (20, 23, 24).
Screening for ACS
The 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was performed to obtain the hypercortisolism status of the patients. Patients who failed to suppress cortisol secretion (>1.8 µg/dL, (50 nmol/L)) were stratified into the ACS group; otherwise, they were placed into the non-ACS group (13, 25, 26). Patients who did not undergo DST were excluded.
Laboratory measurement
The serum cortisol concentration was measured by a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Architect, Abbott, VA, USA). Plasma aldosterone levels were measured by radioimmunoassay kits (ALDO-RIACT; Cisbio Bioassays, Codolet, France). The protocols and procedures were performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
Discordance and concordance between image and AVS
Discordance of image and AVS results was defined by the presence of bilateral normal adrenal glands on imaging with lateralization on AVS, bilateral abnormal appearance of adrenal glands with lateralization on AVS, or unilateral lesion on imaging with either nonlateralization or contralateral lateralization on AVS. Concordance was defined as a unilateral lesion on imaging with corresponding lateralization on AVS, bilateral adrenal gland abnormality with nonlateralization on AVS, or bilateral normal adrenal imaging with nonlateralization on AVS.
Postoperative analysis
Among patients who met the inclusion criteria, those who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy were included in the postoperative analysis. Patients who had undergone partial adrenalectomy or bilateral adrenal surgery were excluded. The AVS-based group was defined as the adrenalectomy side in agreement with AVS lateralization (no matter what abnormality was shown in imaging studies). The image-based group was defined as the adrenalectomy side determined based on imaging findings (CT/MRI) of unilateral adrenal lesions, regardless of AVS results. The determination of unilateral PA in these patients receiving unilateral adrenalectomy was based on serial board discussions, in which the imaging and biochemical data, including unilateral adrenal lesion, hypokalemia, marked elevation of ARR, and young age (<35 years), were considered (27, 28, 29).
Postoperative clinical and laboratory results were collected from the electronic medical records of the TAIPAI database. Postoperative analysis of clinical or biochemical success was performed in accordance with the International Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) international consensus (29). Complete clinical and biochemical success rates were compared between the different groups.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS statistical software 23.0 for Windows. Demographic and biochemical data are presented as mean (standard deviation) for normally distributed data, median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed data, or number (percentage). The independent Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test were used for continuous variables, as appropriate, and the Χ 2 test was applied to the categorical variables. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were also calculated. We compared the demographic characteristics, AVS lateralization, imaging studies, and image–AVS concordance rates between the ACS and non-ACS groups. Postoperative results of the two groups for complete clinical and biochemical success were examined via Χ 2 test, and logistic regression models. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results
Demographics
In total, 327 patients were initially enrolled in this study (Fig. 1). Six patients were excluded because of overt Cushing syndrome. Another six patients were excluded because of failed cannulation of either one-sided or bilateral adrenal veins. Sixty-nine patients who did not undergo DST were also excluded. Of the 246 patients remaining, 65 (26.4%) failed to suppress cortisol secretion (>1.8 µg/dL) after a 1 mg overnight DST, indicating ACS (13). The relevant demographics, clinical conditions, biochemical parameters, AVS results, and image analysis are shown in Table 1 (for additional details see the Supplementary Materials, see section on supplementary materials given at the end of this article).
Baseline demographics and characteristics of the included patients, including the postoperative results.
n (%) | P | ||
---|---|---|---|
ACS (n = 65) | Non-ACS (n = 181) | ||
Age (years) | 56.7 ± 10.4 | 52.6 ± 11.1 | 0.48 |
Sex | |||
Female (%) | 41 (63.1%) | 87 (48.1%) | 0.04 |
Male (%) | 24 (36.9%) | 94 (51.9%) | |
BMI | 25.7 ± 4.5 | 27.0 ± 5.5 | 0.38 |
BP at diagnosis | |||
SBP (mmHg) | 159 ± 26 | 157 ± 23 | 0.26 |
DBP (mmHg) | 92 ± 13 | 96 ± 15 | 0.32 |
Biochemistry | |||
Serum potassium (mmol/L) | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 0.35 |
Hypokalemia (<3.5 mmol/L) | 23 (35.4%) | 66 (36.5%) | 0.88 |
Plasma aldosterone (ng/dL) | 37.1 ± 25.4 | 37.1 ± 27.8 | 0.73 |
ARR | 285.3 ± 451.3 | 239.5 ± 515.2 | 0.73 |
Cortisol post DST (μg/dL) | 4.9 ± 3.5 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | <0.001 |
AVS lateralization | |||
Lateralized | 27 (41.5%) | 74 (40.9%) | 0.93 |
Nonlateralized | 38 (58.5%) | 107 (59.1%) | |
Image | |||
Bilateral normality | 3 (4.6%) | 27 (14.9%) | 0.006 |
Single side abnormality | 41 (63.1%) | 124 (68.5%) | |
Bilateral abnormalities | 21 (32.3%) | 30 (16.6%) | |
Postoperative clinical resolution (n = 69) | |||
Complete | 7 (50.0%) | 30 (54.5%) | 0.52 |
Partial | 5 (35.7%) | 22 (40.0%) | |
Absent | 2 (14.3%) | 3 (5.5%) | |
Postoperative biochemical resolution (n = 66) | |||
Complete | 9 (64.3%) | 51 (98.1%) | 0.001 |
Partial | 2 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
Absent | 3 (21.4%) | 1 (1.9%) | |
Pathology (n = 84) | |||
Adenoma | 19 (90.5%) | 44 (69.8%) | 0.081 |
Hyperplasia | 2 (9.5%) | 19 (30.2%) |
ACS, autonomous cortisol secretion; ARR, aldosterone-to-renin ratio; AVS, adrenal venous sampling; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DST, dexamethasone suppression test; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
The ACS group consisted of more female patients than the non-ACS group (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in blood pressure, serum potassium level, PAC, and ARR. Cortisol levels after DST were significantly higher in the ACS group (P < 0.001).
Image–AVS concordance
AVS lateralization did not differ between the groups (41.5 vs 40.9%). Most of the patients underwent CT, while only five patients underwent MRI. The ACS group showed a higher percentage of bilateral abnormalities and fewer bilateral normal-appearing adrenal glands than the non-ACS group (32.3 vs 16.6%, P = 0.012 and 4.6 vs 14.9%, P = 0.028, respectively). The comparison of discordance and concordance of the imaging and AVS results between the two groups is shown in Fig. 2. The image–AVS discordance rate was significantly higher in the ACS group than in the non-ACS group ((75.4% (n = 49)) vs 56.4% (n = 102); OR = 2.37 (CI: 1.26–4.48); P = 0.007).
Analysis of the postoperative outcomes
Among the patients who met the inclusion criteria, 111 (45.1%) underwent adrenalectomy, and of those, 101 (91%) underwent unilateral total adrenalectomy. Ten patients (9%) who underwent partial adrenalectomy or bilateral adrenal surgery were excluded from postoperative analysis. Sixty-nine patients (68.3%) had a 1-year follow-up record for clinical outcome evaluation (with 20.6 months mean follow-up duration); sixty-six patients (65.3%) had complete records for biochemical outcome evaluation (with 21.0 months mean follow-up duration).
The international consensus from the PASO study was applied for the postoperative evaluation (29). Clinical, biochemical, and pathological results are shown at the bottom of Table 1. Complete clinical success did not vary between the two groups (50.0% (n = 7) vs 54.5% (n = 30); P = 0.52). Complete biochemical success was attained in 64.3% (n = 9) of patients in the ACS group, which was significantly lower than that in the non-ACS group (98.1% (n = 51)) (OR = 28.333 (CI: 2.954–271.779); P = 0.001) (Fig. 3A).
In single logistic regression analyses, the presence of ACS was the only significant predictor of postoperative complete biochemical success (OR = 0.035 (CI: 0.004–0.339), P = 0.004) (Table 2). No associated factors were found to predict complete postoperative clinical success in our study.
Factors associated with the complete biochemical success after unilateral adrenalectomy.
Characteristics | Univariate | |
---|---|---|
Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
Sex (female) | 0.382 (0.065–2.25) | 0.288 |
BMI | 0.919 (0.774–1.091) | 0.334 |
SBP | 1.011 (0.971–1.052) | 0.604 |
DBP | 1.009 (0.946–1.076) | 0.784 |
Hypokalemia (<3.5 mmol/L) | 0.244 (0.027–2.22) | 0.211 |
ACS (DST > 1.8 μg/dL) | 0.035 (0.004–0.339) | 0.004 |
Lateralized by AVS | 2.444 (0.416–14.379) | 0.323 |
Lesion size note on image | 1.002 (0.901–1.113) | 0.977 |
Unilateral image abnormality | 0.308 (0.048–1.964) | 0.213 |
Bilateral image abnormality | 4.5 (0.676–29.948) | 0.12 |
ACS, autonomous cortisol secretion; AVS, adrenal venous sampling; BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DST, dexamethasone suppression test; SBP, systolic blood pressure. Bold indicates statistical significance, P < 0.05.
Patients were divided into two major groups: adrenalectomy based on the image or based on the AVS results. Subgroup analysis of adrenalectomy based on the AVS results is shown in Fig. 3B. All patients in the non-ACS group achieved complete biochemical success (100% (n = 30)), which was significantly higher than that in the ACS group (60% (n = 5), P = 0.017). Among the image-based adrenalectomies, there was a trend of higher complete biochemical results in the non-ACS group, but this was not statistically significant (95.5% (n = 22) vs 66.7% (n = 9); P = 0.063) (Fig. 3C). Complete clinical success in both subgroup analyses did not show a significant difference. In all patients, the postoperative clinical and biochemical outcomes showed no significant differences between the image-based and AVS-based adrenalectomy subgroups (P = 1 and P = 0.41, respectively).
Discussion
In this study, we focused on the influence of ACS in PA patients, including the AVS-image discordance and postoperative outcomes, and revealed unsatisfactory postoperative biochemical outcomes in PA patients with ACS. The ACS rate in our patients was 26.4%, which was within the range reported in previous studies (4–27%) (10, 13, 30, 31, 32). Female patients had a higher ACS prevalence than males (Table 1), consistent with prior research (13, 14, 33). The ACS group had fewer bilateral normal adrenal glands and more bilateral abnormal ones in imaging (4.6 vs 14.4% and 32.3 vs 16.6%, respectively). This aligns with prior studies associating bilateral incidentalomas with a higher ACS likelihood (34). This may be due to the heterogeneity of both aldosterone- and glucocorticoid-producing lesions (35).
A major concern in ACS is that excess cortisol secretion may impact the aldosterone–cortisol ratio and further alter the image–AVS relationship. In the general population of PA patients, image–AVS discordance rates have been reported to range from 37.8% (36) to as high as 67% (37). In our study, the total discordance rate was 61.4% (151/246), with a significantly higher discordance rate in the ACS group than in the non-ACS group (Fig. 2; 75.4 vs 56.4%, P = 0.007). Kline et al. also developed an algorithm for detecting possible ACS in patients without confirmation by DST and stated that the cortisol co-secretion condition was observed in 40% of patients with CT-AVS discordance (14). Thus, the reconsideration of cortisol as a critical parameter in calculating LI has emerged. Ceolotto et al. proposed the use of different laboratory measurements, including androstenedione, metanephrine, and normetanephrine as substitute biomarkers for AVS parameters, and obtained a more sensitive SI than when cortisol was used (38). These biomarkers may also eliminate the effect of cortisol on LI in ACS patients and provide more accurate lateralization. However, further verification is required to confirm this hypothesis.
As for the postoperative analysis, our study further revealed the inferiority of prognosis in the ACS group, especially considering the biochemical results. Without regarding ACS, our study exhibited a slightly higher complete clinical success rate (54 vs 37%) and a slightly lower complete biochemical success rate (91 vs 94%) in comparison to the PASO study (29). However, our results showed that the presence of ACS led to a significantly lower complete biochemical success rate, even after further division into AVS-based or image-based subgroups (Fig. 3). Furthermore, univariate logistic regression analyses showed that among the different factors, ACS was the only negative predictor of biochemical outcome (Table 2). Peng et al. also focused on the prognosis after adrenalectomy in PA patients with ACS (39). They summarized that the presence of hypercortisolism (which was defined as DST > 1.5 µg/dL) had a lower complete clinical success rate. Their biochemical results did not differ significantly. A possible reason for this discordance between our study and theirs might be the different patient groups. Peng et al. focused only on APA patients (39), whereas we did not exclude patients with adrenal hyperplasia. Hacini et al. revealed that patients with bilateral hyperplasia may show asymmetric aldosterone production, resulting in an absent biochemical cure (40). Another possible reason is the difference in the DST criteria applied; we used 1.8 µg/dL as the DST cutoff value in line with other studies (13, 32, 33), while they used 1.5 µg/dL.
The ACS group showed increased image–AVS discordance and a lower biochemical success rate after unilateral adrenalectomy. Choosing adrenalectomy is complex when images suggest a unilateral adrenal lesion, but AVS points to lateralization on the opposite side. This raises the question of whether to rely on imaging or AVS for adrenalectomy decisions.
Recent studies have shown that the clinical and biochemical success of adrenalectomy based on imaging studies alone did not differ from that of adrenalectomy based on AVS in PA patients, especially in younger age groups (23, 41). Our results were similar. Irrespective of the ACS and non-ACS groups, the postoperative outcomes did not differ between the image-based adrenalectomy and AVS-based adrenalectomy subgroups. A randomized controlled trial specifically targeting ACS patients may be necessary to establish a more definitive conclusion.
Our study has some limitations. The total number of ACS patients is still insufficient to support that surgical decisions should be determined by AVS or imaging study. More studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm this result, especially in ACS patients. Another limitation is that we did not investigate the urinary free cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels, postoperative hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal suppression test, somatic mutation, and pathological demonstration of CYP11B1 in resected specimens. To obtain a panoramic view of the effects of ACS on image–AVS discordance, long-term postoperative cohort and risk stratification should be done, and additional parameters, data, and surgical results should be gathered.
Conclusion
In PA patients with ACS, the image–AVS discordance rate was significantly higher and the postoperative complete biochemical success rate was significantly lower than in those without ACS. In the logistic regression analysis, ACS was the only negative predictor of biochemical outcome. There was no improvement in postoperative outcomes, regardless of whether adrenalectomy was based on AVS or imaging. Further studies with a larger number of ACS patients and novel biomarkers for AVS evaluation are crucial to attain better postoperative outcomes for PA patients with ACS.
Supplementary materials
This is linked to the online version of the paper at https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-23-0121.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose in relation to this work.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the MOST-111-2628-B-002-025-MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan to C.C.C.
Acknowledgements
The authors greatly appreciate the Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation (TAIPAI) Study Group for technical assistance.
References
- 1↑
Stewart PM. Mineralocorticoid hypertension. Lancet 1999 353 1341–1347. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(9806102-9)
- 2↑
Mosso L, Carvajal C, GonzáLez A, Barraza A, Avila F, Montero JN, Huete A, Gederlini A, & Fardella CE. Primary aldosteronism and hypertensive disease. Hypertension 2003 42 161–165. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000079505.25750.11)
- 3↑
Rossi GP, Bernini G, Caliumi C, Desideri G, Fabris B, Ferri C, Ganzaroli C, Giacchetti G, Letizia C, Maccario M, et al.A prospective study of the prevalence of primary aldosteronism in 1,125 hypertensive patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2006 48 2293–2300. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.059)
- 4↑
Libianto R, Russell GM, Stowasser M, Gwini SM, Nuttall P, Shen J, Young MJ, Fuller PJ, & Yang J. Detecting primary aldosteronism in Australian primary care: a prospective study. Medical Journal of Australia 2022 216 408–412. (https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51438)
- 5↑
Nwariaku FE, Miller BS, Auchus R, Holt S, Watumull L, Dolmatch B, Nesbitt S, Vongpatanasin W, Victor R, Wians F, et al.Primary hyperaldosteronism: Effect of adrenal vein sampling on surgical outcome. Archives of Surgery 2006 141 497–502. (https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.5.497)
- 6↑
Kim JY, Kim SH, Lee HJ, Kim YH, Kim MJ, & Cho SH. Adrenal venous sampling for stratifying patients for surgery of adrenal nodules detected using dynamic contrast enhanced CT. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 2013. (https://doi.org/10.5152/dir)
- 7↑
Funder JW, Carey RM, Mantero F, Murad MH, Reincke M, Shibata H, Stowasser M, & Young WF. The management of primary aldosteronism: case detection, diagnosis, and treatment: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2016 101 1889–1916. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4061)
- 8↑
Rossi GP, Auchus RJ, Brown M, Lenders JWM, Naruse M, Plouin PF, Satoh F, & Young WF. An expert consensus statement on use of adrenal vein sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism. Hypertension 2014 63 151–160. (https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02097)
- 9↑
Rossi GP, Rossitto G, Amar L, Azizi M, Riester A, Reincke M, Degenhart C, Widimsky J, Naruse M, Deinum J, et al.Clinical outcomes of 1625 patients with primary aldosteronism subtyped with adrenal vein sampling. Hypertension 2019 74 800–808. (https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13463)
- 10↑
Inoue K, Kitamoto T, Tsurutani Y, Saito J, Omura M, & Nishikawa T. Cortisol co-secretion and clinical usefulness of ACTH stimulation test in primary aldosteronism: a systematic review and biases in epidemiological studies. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne) 2021 12 645488. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.645488)
- 11↑
Piaditis GP, Kaltsas GA, Androulakis II, Gouli A, Makras P, Papadogias D, Dimitriou K, Ragkou D, Markou A, Vamvakidis K, et al.High prevalence of autonomous cortisol and aldosterone secretion from adrenal adenomas. Clinical Endocrinology 2009 71 772–778. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03551.x)
- 12↑
Hiraishi K, Yoshimoto T, Tsuchiya K, Minami I, Doi M, Izumiyama H, Sasano H, & Hirata Y. Clinicopathological features of primary aldosteronism associated with subclinical Cushing's syndrome. Endocrine Journal 2011 58 543–551. (https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.k10e-402)
- 13↑
Terzolo M, Pia A, & Reimondo G. Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome: definition and management. Clinical Endocrinology 2012 76 12–18. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04253.x)
- 14↑
Kline GA, So B, Campbell DJT, Chin A, Harvey A, Venos E, Pasieka J, & Leung AA. Apparent failed and discordant adrenal vein sampling: a potential confounding role of cortisol cosecretion? Clinical Endocrinology 2022 96 123–131. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14546)
- 15↑
Nakajima Y, Yamada M, Taguchi R, Satoh T, Hashimoto K, Ozawa A, Shibusawa N, Okada S, Monden T, & Mori M. Cardiovascular complications of patients with aldosteronism associated with autonomous cortisol secretion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2011 96 2512–2518. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2743)
- 16↑
Gerards J, Heinrich DA, Adolf C, Meisinger C, Rathmann W, Sturm L, Nirschl N, Bidlingmaier M, Beuschlein F, Thorand B, et al.Impaired glucose metabolism in primary aldosteronism is associated with cortisol cosecretion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2019 104 3192–3202. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-00299)
- 17↑
Späth M, Korovkin S, Antke C, Anlauf M, & Willenberg HS. Aldosterone- and cortisol-co-secreting adrenal tumors: the lost subtype of primary aldosteronism. European Journal of Endocrinology 2011 164 447–455. (https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-1070)
- 18↑
Heinrich DA, Quinkler M, Adolf C, Handgriff L, Müller L, Schneider H, Sturm L, Künzel H, Seidensticker M, Deniz S, et al.Influence of cortisol cosecretion on non-ACTH-stimulated adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism: a retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Endocrinology 2022 187 637–650. (https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0541)
- 19↑
Wu VC, Yang SY, Lin JW, Cheng BW, Kuo CC, Tsai CT, Chu TS, Huang KH, Wang SM, Lin YH, et al.Kidney impairment in primary aldosteronism. Clinica Chimica Acta 2011 412 1319–1325. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.02.018)
- 20↑
Wu VC, Hu YH, Er LK, Yen RF, Chang CH, Chang YL, Lu CC, Chang CC, Lin JH, Lin YH, et al.Case detection and diagnosis of primary aldosteronism - the consensus of Taiwan Society of Aldosteronism. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 2017 116 993–1005. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2017.06.004)
- 21↑
Sam D, Kline GA, So B, & Leung AA. Discordance between imaging and adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism irrespective of interpretation criteria. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2019 104 1900–1906. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-02089)
- 22↑
Kem DC, Weinberger MH, Gomez-Sanchez C, Kramer NJ, Lerman R, Furuyama S, & Nugent CA. Circadian rhythm of plasma aldosterone concentration in patients with primary aldosteronism. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1973 52 2272–2277. (https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107414)
- 23↑
Rossi GP, Crimì F, Rossitto G, Amar L, Azizi M, Riester A, Reincke M, Degenhart C, Widimsky J, Naruse M, et al.Feasibility of imaging-guided adrenalectomy in young patients with primary aldosteronism. Hypertension 2022 79 187–195. (https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18284)
- 24↑
Huang CW, Lee BC, Liu KL, Chang YC, Wu VC, Lee PT, Chang CC & TAIPAI Study Group. Preoperative non-stimulated adrenal venous sampling index for predicting outcomes of adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 2020 119 1185–1192. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2020.04.016)
- 25↑
Nieman LK, Biller BMK, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, & Montori VM. The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2008 93 1526–1540. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0125)
- 26↑
Tabarin A, Bardet S, Bertherat J, Dupas B, Chabre O, Hamoir E, Laurent F, Tenenbaum F, Cazalda M, Lefebvre H, et al.Exploration and management of adrenal incidentalomas. Annales d’Endocrinologie 2008 69 487–500. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2008.09.003)
- 27↑
Naruse M, Katabami T, Shibata H, Sone M, Takahashi K, Tanabe A, Izawa S, Ichijo T, Otsuki M, Omura M, et al.Japan Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism 2021. Endocrine Journal 2022 69 327–359. (https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ21-0508)
- 28↑
Umakoshi H, Ogasawara T, Takeda Y, Kurihara I, Itoh H, Katabami T, Ichijo T, Wada N, Shibayama Y, Yoshimoto T, et al.Accuracy of adrenal computed tomography in predicting the unilateral subtype in young patients with hypokalaemia and elevation of aldosterone in primary aldosteronism. Clinical Endocrinology 2018 88 645–651. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13582)
- 29↑
Williams TA, Lenders JWM, Mulatero P, Burrello J, Rottenkolber M, Adolf C, Satoh F, Amar L, Quinkler M, Deinum J, et al.Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort. Lancet. Diabetes and Endocrinology 2017 5 689–699. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(1730135-3)
- 30↑
Goupil R, Wolley M, Ungerer J, Mcwhinney B, Mukai K, Naruse M, Gordon RD, & Stowasser M. Use of plasma metanephrine to aid adrenal venous sampling in combined aldosterone and cortisol over-secretion. Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Case Reports 2015 2015 150075. (https://doi.org/10.1530/EDM-15-0075)
- 31↑
Tang L, Li X, Wang B, Ma X, Li H, Gao Y, Gu L, Nie W, & Zhang X. Clinical characteristics of aldosterone- and cortisol-coproducing adrenal adenoma in primary aldosteronism. International Journal of Endocrinology 2018 2018 4920841. (https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4920841)
- 32↑
Bhatt PS, Sam AH, Meeran KM, & Salem V. The relevance of cortisol co-secretion from aldosterone-producing adenomas. Hormones 2019 18 307–313. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-019-00114-8)
- 33↑
O’Toole SM, Sze W-CC, Chung TT, Akker SA, Druce MR, Waterhouse M, Pitkin S, Dawnay A, Sahdev A, Matson M, et al.Low-grade cortisol cosecretion has limited impact on ACTH-stimulated AVS parameters in primary aldosteronism. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2020 105 e3784. (https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa519)
- 34↑
Pasternak JD, Seib CD, Seiser N, Tyrell JB, Liu C, Cisco RM, Gosnell JE, Shen WT, Suh I, & Duh QY. Differences between bilateral adrenal incidentalomas and unilateral lesions. JAMA Surgery 2015 150 974–978. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1683)
- 35↑
Mete O, & Duan K. The many faces of primary aldosteronism and Cushing syndrome: a reflection of adrenocortical tumor heterogeneity. Frontiers in Medicine 2018 5 54. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00054)
- 36↑
Kempers MJ, Lenders JW, van Outheusden L, van der Wilt GJ, Schultze Kool LJ, Hermus AR, & Deinum J. Systematic review: diagnostic procedures to differentiate unilateral from bilateral adrenal abnormality in primary aldosteronism. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009 151 329–337. (https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00007)
- 37↑
Rao A, Melby JC, & Wilson TE. Prohormones in adrenal venous effluent in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1995 80 1677–1680. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.80.5.7745017)
- 38↑
Ceolotto G, Antonelli G, Caroccia B, Battistel M, Barbiero G, Plebani M, & Rossi GP. Comparison of cortisol, androstenedione and metanephrines to assess selectivity and lateralization of adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2021 10 4755. (https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204755)
- 39↑
Peng KY, Liao HW, Chan CK, Lin WC, Yang SY, Tsai YC, Huang KH, Lin YH, Chueh JS, & Wu VC. Presence of subclinical hypercortisolism in clinical aldosterone-producing adenomas predicts lower clinical success. Hypertension 2020 76 1537–1544. (https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15328)
- 40↑
Hacini I, De Sousa K, Boulkroun S, Meatchi T, Amar L, Zennaro MC, & Fernandes-Rosa FL. Somatic mutations in adrenals from patients with primary aldosteronism not cured after adrenalectomy suggest common pathogenic mechanisms between unilateral and bilateral disease. European Journal of Endocrinology 2021 185 405–412. (https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0338)
- 41↑
Thiesmeyer JW, Ullmann TM, Stamatiou AT, Limberg J, Stefanova D, Beninato T, Finnerty BM, Vignaud T, Leclerc J, Fahey TJ, et al.Association of adrenal venous sampling with outcomes in primary aldosteronism for unilateral adenomas. JAMA Surgery 2021 156 165–171. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5011)