Search for other papers by V G Pluimakers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M van Waas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C W N Looman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M P de Maat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R de Jonge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P Delhanty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Huisman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F U S Mattace-Raso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M M van den Heuvel-Eibrink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Section Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by S J C M M Neggers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, based on principal component analysis and vascular ultrasound measurements. Patients and methods Patients Patients were actively recruited as described before ( 3 ). Briefly, all long-term (5 or more years after treatment) adult survivors of
Department of Electronic Science, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Search for other papers by Jia Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yan Zhao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Caoxin Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zheng Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiulin Shi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Long Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhong Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xuejun Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. The XCMS software was employed to convert each data file into a matrix of detected peaks. Differences in metabolic profiles on LC-MS were determined by principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS
Search for other papers by Li Jing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wang Chengji in
Google Scholar
PubMed
out PCA analysis, the results shown in Fig. 3 , the first principal component (PC1) and the second principal component (PC2) contain information amount of 21.3 and 12.3%, respectively. As can be seen from Fig. 3 , the control group and the DM group
Search for other papers by Yang Yu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hairong Hao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Linghui Kong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jie Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Feng Bai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fei Guo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pan Wei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rui Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wen Hu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the relative abundance of each metabolite type in each sample. (D) 2D principal component score plots of the analysed samples and box plots corresponding to the principal component scores. (E) Partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Ju-shuang Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Tao Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jing-jing Zuo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Cheng-nan Guo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Fang Peng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Shu-zhen Zhao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Hui-hui Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Xiang-qing Hou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Ophthalmology, Pingxiang People’s Hospital of Southern Medical University, Pingxiang, Jiangxi, China
Search for other papers by Yuan Lan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Ya-ping Wei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chao Zheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center on Evidence-Based Medicine & Clinical Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Center on Clinical Research, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Guang-yun Mao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, we additionally performed a multiple principal component analysis (PCA) on n-6 PUFAs to total n-3 PUFAs. As we could see in Fig. 2 , the top two principle components (PC) could explain 80.8% (62.0 and 18.8% for the 1st and 2nd PC, respectively) of
Department of Endocrinology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Metabolism and Diabetology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other papers by Charlotte Höybye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erik Wahlström in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Petra Tollet-Egnell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gunnar Norstedt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
custom scripts. Statistical analyses The values are presented as median and range or means± s.e.m . For univariate data Student's t -test was used. All multivariate statistical analyses, i.e. principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal projections
Department of Endocrinology, The People’s Hospital of Daxing District, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Ya-Fen Hu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lin Hua in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiu Tuo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ting-Ting Shi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yi-Lin Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yun-Fu Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhong-Yu Yan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhong Xin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
analysis was performed to find the association between the gene block and the CT index block ( Fig. 3A ). The loadings of the gene markers indicated the association strength to the first principal component (named as comp 1) of the CT index block. The X
Search for other papers by Lei Lei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yi-Hua Bai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hong-Ying Jiang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ting He in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Meng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jia-Ping Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
peaks between T2D and control. (B) The top 50 up- and downregulated differential peaks genes from A. The red-colored genes were upregulated and the blue-colored genes were downregulated. (C) Principle component analysis (PCA) for the m6A methylome
Search for other papers by Sandra N Slagter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robert P van Waateringe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by André P van Beek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Melanie M van der Klauw in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jana V van Vliet-Ostaptchouk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is nowadays frequently used to identify individuals at higher risk for future type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) ( 1 ). Recognized metabolic risk components are abdominal obesity
eXtraOrdinarY Kids Clinic, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
Search for other papers by Shanlee M Davis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rhianna Urban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelo D’Alessandro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie A Reisz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christine L Chan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Megan Kelsey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
eXtraOrdinarY Kids Clinic, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
Search for other papers by Susan Howell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
eXtraOrdinarY Kids Clinic, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
Search for other papers by Nicole Tartaglia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
eXtraOrdinarY Kids Clinic, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
Search for other papers by Philip Zeitler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Baker II in
Google Scholar
PubMed
used to generate a volcano plot identifying metabolites with a fold change >1.5 and FDR <0.05. To determine if a unique metabolome profile is present in KS, partial least squares – discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), a variant of principal component