Search Results
Search for other papers by Peiwen Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dongjie He in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hao Chang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiaozhi Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
those of G4 disease (5-year: AAPC, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.14–0.94; 10-year: AAPC, 0.32; 95% CI, −0.62–1.28). Multivariable analysis of OS Next, we performed a multivariate analysis to further explore the independent prognostic risk factors ( Fig. 6
Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Luca Giovanella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Luisa Garo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Domenico Albano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rainer Görges in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Oncology Research, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Luca Ceriani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
= 127) (2.38 (95% CI: 1.71; 3.30; test of 𝜗: z = 5.16, P < 0.001; test of homogeneity: Q = 𝜒 2 (4) = 2.49, P = 0.65; I 2 = 0.00%) ( Fig. 5 ). Risk ratio of patients with Tg-DT < 1 year showed no significantly changes after subgroup analysis
Search for other papers by Jiaxin Luo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Weili Yin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Qiuxia Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juqing Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pan Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuanna Ling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jing Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhen Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liqin Pan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yanying Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei Ouyang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Huijuan Feng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.602–83.398 months), and the 3- and 5-year LPFS probabilities were 57.8 and 45.1%, respectively ( Fig. 2 ). Log-rank analysis ( Fig. 3 and Table 5 ) showed that the impacts of the following six variables on LPFS were statistically significant: bone metastasis as
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Nikolaos Kyriakakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marilena Giannoudi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Satish S Kumar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Khyatisha Seejore in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgios K Dimitriadis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harpal Randeva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Adam Glaser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michelle Kwok-Williams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgina Gerrard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carmel Loughrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Al-Qaissi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ramzi Ajjan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie Lynch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Robert D Murray in
Google Scholar
PubMed
malignant brain tumours before the age of 15 years ( 1 ). Not dissimilar outcomes are observed in teenage and young adults (15–40 years), in whom 5-year survival approaches 68%. In contrast, considerably lower 5-year survival rates of up to 20% are observed
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Josephina G Kuiper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Aline C Fenneman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne H van der Spek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elena Rampanelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Max Nieuwdorp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Valery E P P Lemmens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ernst J Kuipers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Ron M C Herings in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Fliers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, and differentiation ( 3 ). Alterations in TH bioavailability have been implicated in the development of several forms of cancer, including basal cell carcinomas ( 4 ), lung cancer ( 5 , 6 ), and colorectal cancer (CRC) ( 7 ). CRC is one of the world
Search for other papers by J Gebauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Skinner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Haupt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Amsterdam UMC, Emma’s Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by L Kremer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H van der Pal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Michel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G T Armstrong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M M Hudson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Hjorth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Lehnert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Langer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Figure 1 Changes in 5-year relative survival (in %, y-axis) for childhood cancer patients (age: 0–14 years) with different cancer entities (x-axis) between 1975 and 2012 (data from ( 1 )). Despite the advances in cancer treatment, many long
Search for other papers by Judith Gebauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claire E Higham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In 2020, there were 19.3 million new cancer cases diagnosed globally ( 1 , 2 ), and numbers continue to rise. During the last few decades, cancer survival has improved considerably; in the 1960s, children had a 5-year cancer survival rate of
Search for other papers by Margarida Brito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susana Prazeres in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Malheiros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
in postmenopausal patients ( 3 ). Yet, the recent positive results from the trials PALOMA 3 ( 4 ) and MONARCH 2 ( 5 ) in the ABC premenopausal groups ER+ HER2− have come to support its generalized use in these patients in association with CDK4
Search for other papers by Carole Morin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Keo-Morakort Benedetto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, UMR Inserm 1052 CNRS 5286, Lyon Cedex 08, France
Search for other papers by Agathe Deville in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France
Search for other papers by Laurent Milot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aurélie Theillaumas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut de Pathologie Est, Bron Cedex, France
Search for other papers by Valérie Hervieu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Gastroentérologie, Lyon Cedex 03, France
Search for other papers by Mathieu Pioche in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Chirurgie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France
Search for other papers by Gilles Poncet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julien Forestier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laurent François in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Endocrinologie, Bron Cedex, France
Search for other papers by Francoise Borson-Chazot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Chirurgie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France
Search for other papers by Mustapha Adham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Catherine Lombard-Bohas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, UMR Inserm 1052 CNRS 5286, Lyon Cedex 08, France
University of Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France
Search for other papers by Thomas Walter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.3) Second year 304 (49.4) 83 (48.8) 221 (49.7) Median age in years (IQR) 63 (52–72) 63 (51–70) 63 (52–73) 0.21 Female, n (%) 264 (42.5) 65 (39.2) 199 (43.7) 0.60 Place of residence, n (%) 0
Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence, Netherlands Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Mark J C van Treijen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Chemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Catharina M Korse in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Gastroenterology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Wieke H Verbeek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Margot E T Tesselaar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence, Netherlands Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Gerlof D Valk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
time to progression was 24.5 (range: 0–62) months. In 12 patients, a NETest score in the year prior to PD (median time between sample and progression: 1.5 months) was available. The median NETest score was 80 (range: 13–93) with 10/12 (83%) NETest