Search Results
Search for other papers by Danielle Christine Maria van der Kaay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Rochtus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gerhard Binder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ingo Kurth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dirk Prawitt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Irène Netchine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Search for other papers by Gudmundur Johannsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anita C S Hokken-Koelega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miriam Elbracht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Eggermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The implementation of high-throughput and deep sequencing methods in routine genetic diagnostics has significantly improved the diagnostic yield in patient cohorts with growth disturbances and becomes increasingly important as the prerequisite of personalized medicine. They provide considerable chances to identify even rare and unexpected situations; nevertheless, we must be aware of their limitations. A simple genetic test in the beginning of a testing cascade might also help to identify the genetic cause of specific growth disorders. However, the clinical picture of genetically caused growth disturbance phenotypes can vary widely, and there is a broad clinical overlap between different growth disturbance disorders. As a consequence, the clinical diagnosis and therewith connected the decision on the appropriate genetic test is often a challenge. In fact, the clinician asking for genetic testing has to weigh different aspects in this decision process, including appropriateness (single gene test, stepwise procedure, comprehensive testing), turnaround time as the basis for rapid intervention, and economic considerations. Therefore, a frequent question in that context is ‘what to test when’. In this review, we aim to review genetic testing strategies and their strengths and limitations and to raise awareness for the future implementation of interdisciplinary genome medicine in diagnoses, treatment, and counselling of growth disturbances.
Search for other papers by Violeta Iotova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlotte Van Beuzekom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Petra Bruegmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuela Broesamle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
collect feedback only separately for every webinar. No summarized follow-up data could be analyzed so far. We also present examples of the dynamics of the overall interest in the Network’s resources that are supposedly connected to the popularity of the
Search for other papers by Christine Poitou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anthony Holland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlotte Höybye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura C G de Graaff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sandrine Bottius in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Berit Otterlei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maithé Tauber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
family with PWS is connected to other PWS families. Clear healthcare pathways for PWS in each country with the possibility for every person with PWS to meet a doctor who has already met many others with PWS. Clear guidelines should include
