Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
Search for other papers by Clara Lundetoft Clausen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Trine Holm Johannsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niels Erik Skakkebæk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hanne Frederiksen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Physical Activity Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Camilla Koch Ryrsø in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arnold Matovu Dungu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Hein Hegelund in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Physical Activity Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Rikke Krogh-Madsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Physical Activity Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Birgitte Lindegaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Allan Linneberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Line Lund Kårhus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Anders Juul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Thomas Benfield in
Google Scholar
PubMed
and etiology. Statistics The study population was characterized using descriptive statistics where categorical variables were reported as counts (%), parametric continuous variables were summarized using means with s.d. , and non
Search for other papers by Iben Katinka Greiber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Casper P Hagen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Siegfried Busch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mikkel Grunnet Mieritz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lise Aksglæde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katharina Main in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristian Almstrup in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anders Juul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
10407022 T>G (TT 684, TG 263, GG 24, minor allele frequency (MAF) 16%) and AMHR2 rs11170547 C>T (CC 777, CT 188, TT 12, MAF 11%). Distributions were consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (Pearson’s χ 2 = 0.05, P = 0.830 and χ 2 = 0.03, P
Search for other papers by Neil R Chappell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Beth Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amy K Schutt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by William E Gibbons in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chellakkan S Blesson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
16 weeks using the A1cNow+ test kit (PTS Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Due to the sub-fertile nature of the animal model, in order to study the oocyte, it was necessary to perform superovulation to
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by M P Schuijt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C G J Sweep in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R van der Steen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A J Olthaar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N M M L Stikkelbroeck in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H A Ross in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A E van Herwaarden in
Google Scholar
PubMed
calculated free testosterone in pregnant females with the formula of Ross et al. ( 21 ) was −0.01 ± 0.01 % (mean ± s.d. ), whereas with the formula of Vermeulen et al. ( 13 ) it was −1.7 ± 0.9% when a fixed albumin concentration of 43 g/L was used
West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Search for other papers by Michael Ulm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arvind V Ramesh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Keely M McNamara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Suriyan Ponnusamy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hironobu Sasano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Search for other papers by Ramesh Narayanan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
respond to low levels of androgens. In addition, mutations in the AR LBD will cause the AR to be refractory to existing treatments. 3. Intra-tumoral androgen synthesis. Androgens such as androstenedione, and DHEA synthesized by the adrenals will be
Search for other papers by Qiu-ming Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bin Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiao-fei An in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jin-an Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liumei Ding in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the pooled RRs of T2DM associated with testosterone. The I 2 and the Cochran’s Q statistic were used to evaluate the heterogeneity ( 11 , 12 ). For the Q statistic, P < 0.10 suggested statistically significant heterogeneity. I 2 more than 50
Search for other papers by Dafydd Aled Rees in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Deborah P Merke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wiebke Arlt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aude Brac De La Perriere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelica Linden Hirschberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anders Juul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John Newell-Price in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Prete in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicole Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nike M Stikkelbroeck in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe A Touraine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alex Lewis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John Porter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helen Coope in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard J Ross in
Google Scholar
PubMed
recommended treatment guideline doses (25 mg/day) ( 4 ). Two thresholds of 17OHP control were analysed, based on whether patients’ 17OHP was above or below 36 nmol/L (3×ULN) and 12 nmol/L (ULN). Quadrant analysis was performed using the two-sided Fisher’s
Search for other papers by Angela Köninger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippos Edimiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Koch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antje Enekwe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudia Lamina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sabine Kasimir-Bauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rainer Kimmig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Vitateq Biotechnology GmbH, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45122 Essen, Germany
Search for other papers by Hans Dieplinger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
range 0.5–2.6 nmol/l) and/or DHEAS (normal range 6–123 μg/dl) and/or androstenedione (normal range 0.3–3.3 ng/ml), and sonographically diagnosed polycystic ovaries (at least one ovary with at least 12 follicles with a diameter of 2–9 mm each or a volume
Search for other papers by Manjeetkaur Sehemby in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Prachi Bansal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vijaya Sarathi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ashwini Kolhe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kanchan Kothari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Swati Jadhav-Ramteke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anurag R Lila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tushar Bandgar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nalini S Shah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
version 23. Categorical variables are expressed in actual numbers and percentages. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± s.d. or median and range. Continuous variables between the two groups were compared using independent t test or Mann
Search for other papers by Eleftherios E Deiktakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eleftheria Ieronymaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Zarén in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnes Hagsund in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elin Wirestrand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johan Malm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christos Tsatsanis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Imperial College London, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, London, UK
Search for other papers by Ilpo T Huhtaniemi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Malmö University Hospital, Reproductive Medicine Center, Malmö, Sweden
Search for other papers by Aleksander Giwercman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yvonne Lundberg Giwercman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
®, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Saint-Prex, Switzerland; n = 5). Dgx+rFSH (Gonal-f, Merck Serono S.A. Aubonne, Switzerland; n = 5). Dgx+antiandrogen (Flutamide, STADA Nordic ApS, Herlev, Denmark; n = 5). Dgx+antiandrogen+rFSH ( n = 5