Search Results
Department of Psychology II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Search for other papers by Marcus Heldmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Krishna Chatterjee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carla Moran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Berenike Rogge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julia Steinhardt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tobias Wagner-Altendorf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Göttlich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hannes Schacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Schramm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, The Christie, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Search for other papers by Georg Brabant in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Psychology II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Search for other papers by Thomas F Münte in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Cirkel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
controls. Independent t -test stated. No difference in educational degree and sex was noted, since exact matching was performed (38.1% O-level, 61.9% A-level, 10/19 (52.6%) females for both groups). Patients Controls Significance Mean
Search for other papers by Lukas Plachy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Petra Dusatkova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klara Maratova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shenali Anne Amaratunga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dana Zemkova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vit Neuman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stanislava Kolouskova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Barbora Obermannova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Snajderova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zdenek Sumnik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Lebl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stepanka Pruhova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, neonatal hypoglycaemia 1.5 −2.7 −2.8 −2.4 −2.9 BDL, below detection limit; CAI, central adrenal insufficiency; CHT, central hypothyroidism; F, female; GH, growth hormone; HH, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; M, male; MRI, magnetic
Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for other papers by Alessandro Barbato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giulia Gori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michele Sacchini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesca Pochiero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Bargiacchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giovanna Traficante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Viviana Palazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lucia Tiberi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudia Bianchini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Mei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elena Parrini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiziana Pisano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elena Procopio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NEUROFARBA Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for other papers by Renzo Guerrini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for other papers by Angela Peron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for other papers by Stefano Stagi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. We suggest periodically assessing pituitary function in MC4DN4-affected individuals. The choice of sermorelin combined with arginine to assess GH secretion in the female patient was driven by the need to rule out the involvement of hypothalamic