Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Gynaecology, and Diabetology, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, IMAGINE Institute affiliate, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Isabelle Flechtner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Gynaecology, and Diabetology, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, IMAGINE Institute affiliate, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Magali Viaud in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dulanjalee Kariyawasam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Gynaecology, and Diabetology, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, IMAGINE Institute affiliate, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Marie Perrissin-Fabert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Gynaecology, and Diabetology, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, IMAGINE Institute affiliate, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Maud Bidet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, AP-HPIE3M, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, ICAN, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Anne Bachelot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, AP-HPIE3M, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, ICAN, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Philippe Touraine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Labrune in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Rare Gynecological Disorders, Hospital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Paediatric Endocrinology, Gynaecology and Diabetology, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Pascale de Lonlay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Gynaecology, and Diabetology, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, IMAGINE Institute affiliate, Paris, France
Centre for Rare Gynecological Disorders, Hospital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Paediatric Endocrinology, Gynaecology and Diabetology, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Michel Polak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Classic galactosemia is a rare inborn error of galactose metabolism with a birth prevalence of about 1/30,000–60,000. Long-term complications occurring despite dietary treatment consist of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and neurodevelopmental impairments. We performed with the French Reference Centers for Rare Diseases a multisite collaborative questionnaire survey for classic galactosemic patients. Its primary objective was to assess their puberty, pregnancy, gonadotropic axis, and pelvic morphology by ultrasound. The secondary objective was to determine predictive factors for pregnancy without oocyte donation. Completed questionnaires from 103 patients, 56 females (median age, 19 years (3–52 years)) and 47 males (median age, 19 years (3–45 years)), were analyzed. Among the 43 females older than 13 years old, mean age for breast development first stage was 13.8 years; spontaneous menarche occurred in 21/31 females at a mean age of 14.6 years. In these 21 women, 62% had spaniomenorrhea and 7/17 older than 30 years had amenorrhea. All age-groups confounded, FSH was above reference range for 65.7% of the patients, anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B were undetectable, and the ovaries were small with few or no follicles detected. Among the 5 females who sought to conceive, 4 had pregnancies. Among the 47 males, 1 had cryptorchidism, all have normal testicular function and none had a desire to conceive children. Thus, spontaneous puberty and POI are both common in this population. Spontaneous menarche seems to be the best predictive factor for successful spontaneous pregnancy.
Search for other papers by Violeta Iotova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Petra Bruegmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuela Broesamle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natasa Bratina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vallo Tillmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN), operational since 2017, consists of 71 health care providers (HCPs) in 19 EU member states. Our objective was to assess education and knowledge on rare endocrine conditions.
Design and methods
A survey was developed and sent through the DIGIT-EUROSURVEY system to all Endo-ERN HCPs.
Results
Response rate was 55% (n = 146), 95% physicians, 58% >20 years of experience, 96% academics. Largest knowledge gaps were reported for the transition and neonatal ages, and for the GPs. Less than 50% of HCPs had structured educational rare diseases (RD) plans, while 86% used RD specific guidelines. HCPs would share educational materials within Endo-ERN (74%), and participate in an accreditation model (85%). E-learning portals of the endocrine scientific societies used 58% (ESPE) and 64% (ESE). Most participants (90%) regarded Endo-ERN coordinated educational activities (annual meetings slots, webinars, etc.) as highly important and supported a common educational platform. Social media was perceived as important for educating patients (86%) but not for physicians (36%). Seventy-five % had developed patient education materials; only 31% had specific children’s materials, and by-country availability varied from 0 to 100%. Respondents provided newly diagnosed patients with their own material in the national language (81%); referred to advocacy groups (68%), and relevant online sources (50%). Respondents believed the European Commission should fund education through Endo-ERN.
Conclusion
Identified knowledge gaps in rare endocrine disorders set the basis for fast catch-up through collaboration, alignment with patients’ needs, and further development of existing and newly developed educational resources.
Faculty of Medicine Division 2, Internal Medicine Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by E K White in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I V Wagner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine Division 2, Internal Medicine Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by C van Beuzekom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Iotova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatrics, UMHAT ‘Sveta Marina’ Varna, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In 2017, the European Commission installed 24 European Reference Networks (ERNs) for different categories of rare and complex conditions to facilitate cross-border health care via virtual case consultations in a secure Clinical Patient Management System (CPMS). The ERN for rare endocrine conditions (Endo-ERN) previously reviewed the CPMS, in which they detailed the difficulties physicians encountered with the system and proposed solutions to these that should enable the system to be used to a greater extent. This paper will further the endeavor of the first by performing a critical evaluation of the CPMS, assessing how these suggested improvements have been implemented, and if these have affected the usage of the system. The evaluation involves an assessment of CPMS usage statistics since its conception that takes into consideration the technical updates and the external factors that may have affected these, including data from a review survey following a training workshop for our new healthcare providers (HCPs) added in January 2022. It appears that the improvements made to the system since the first review, in particular the implementation of the Operational Helpdesk, have had a positive effect in increasing CPMS membership; however, the regular usage of the system continues to fluctuate. Several suggestions are made on how to further facilitate the use of CPMS by our members both individually and network-wide, by integrating CPMS activities with other network initiatives and further integrating these into national health care systems as well as looking for ways to measure patient satisfaction from the CPMS discussions outcomes.
Search for other papers by Alicia Romano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juan Pablo Kaski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jovanna Dahlgren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicky Kelepouris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto Pietropoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tilman R Rohrer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel Polak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The study aims to assess the cardiovascular safety of growth hormone (GH) treatment in patients with Noonan syndrome (NS) in clinical practice.
Design
The study design involves two observational, multicentre studies (NordiNet® IOS and the ANSWER Program) evaluating the long-term effectiveness and safety of GH in >38,000 paediatric patients, of which 421 had NS.
Methods
Serious adverse events, serious adverse reactions (SARs) and non-serious adverse reactions (NSARs) were reported by the treating physicians. Cardiovascular comorbidities at baseline and throughout the studies were also recorded.
Results
The safety analysis set comprised 412 children with NS (29.1% females), with a mean (s.d.) baseline age of 9.29 (3.88) years, treated with an average GH dose of 0.047 (0.014) mg/kg/day during childhood. Cardiovascular comorbidities at baseline were reported in 48 (11.7%), most commonly pulmonary valve stenosis (PVS) and atrial septal defects. Overall, 22 (5.3%) patients experienced 34 safety events. The most common were the NSARs: headache (eight events in seven patients) and arthralgia (five events in three patients). Two SARs occurred in one patient (brain neoplasm and metastases to spine). No cardiovascular safety events were recorded in patients with NS. Five cardiovascular comorbidities in five patients were reported after initiation of GH treatment: three cases of unspecified cardiovascular disease, one ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and one PVS.
Conclusions
GH treatment had a favourable safety profile in patients with NS, including those with cardiovascular comorbidities. Prospective studies are warranted to systematically assess the safety of GH treatment in patients with NS and cardiovascular disease.
Search for other papers by Violeta Iotova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Université de Paris, Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Jerome Bertherat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George Mastorakos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Luca Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martine Cools in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stamatina Ioakim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Faisal Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Silvia Andonova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Magdalena Avbelj-Stefanija in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Baronio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jerome Bouligand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hennie T Bruggenwirth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin H Davies in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elfride De Baere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Iveta Dzivite-Krisane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paula Fernandez-Alvarez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Gheldof in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Claudia Giavoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claus H Gravholt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul-Martin Holterhus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anders Juul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Csilla Krausz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
West of Scotland Centre for Genomic Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Search for other papers by Ruth McGowan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Uta Neumann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Novelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xavier Peyrassol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonidas A Phylactou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julia Rohayem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Touraine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dineke Westra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Valeria Vezzoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raffaella Rossetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Differences of sex development and maturation (SDM) represent a heterogeneous puzzle of rare conditions with a large genetic component whose management and treatment could be improved by an accurate classification of underlying molecular conditions, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) should represent the most appropriate approach. Therefore, we conducted a survey dedicated to the use and potential outcomes of NGS for SDM disorders diagnosis among the 53 health care providers (HCP) of the European Reference Network for rare endocrine conditions. The response rate was 49% with a total of 26 HCPs from 13 countries. All HCPs, except 1, performed NGS investigations for SDM disorders on 6720 patients, 3764 (56%) with differences of sex development (DSD), including 811 unexplained primary ovarian insufficiency, and 2956 (44%) with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). The approaches varied from targeted analysis of custom gene panels (range: 11–490 genes) in 81.5% of cases or whole exome sequencing with the extraction of a virtual panel in the remaining cases. These analyses were performed for diagnostic purposes in 21 HCPs, supported by the National Health Systems in 16 cases. The likelihood of finding a variant ranged between 7 and 60%, mainly depending upon the number of analysed genes or criteria used for reporting, most HCPs also reporting variants of uncertain significance. These data illustrate the status of genetic diagnosis of DSD and CHH across Europe. In most countries, these analyses are performed for diagnostic purposes, yielding highly variable results, thus suggesting the need for harmonization and general improvements of NGS approaches.
Search for other papers by A J Clark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
this, we consider that there are two areas in which we do not cater sufficiently for the discipline and which we now seek to address. These are the areas of Paediatric Endocrinology and Genetics. In the case of Paediatric Endocrinology, we believe
Search for other papers by Martin Bidlingmaier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helena Gleeson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana-Claudia Latronico in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin O Savage in
Google Scholar
PubMed
interruption during transition. In 2005, the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology published a consensus statement to guide the evaluation of rhGH-treated young people at the end of linear growth. It was recommended that patients be categorised into
Search for other papers by Heike Hoyer-Kuhn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angela Huebner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anette Richter-Unruh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Bettendorf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tilman Rohrer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus Kapelari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
St.Anna Kinderspital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Search for other papers by Stefan Riedl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus Mohnike in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helmuth-Günther Dörr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Friedrich-Wilhelm Roehl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katharina Fink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Reinhard W Holl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joachim Woelfle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
with CAH were collected in a standardized database. Later, the German Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (DGKED) took responsibility for the registry (DGKED-QS)). Until now 49 centers have participated in the DGKED-QS registry. Centers
Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU), Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Search for other papers by Letícia Ribeiro Oliveira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos Alberto Longui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Search for other papers by Guilherme Guaragna-Filho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Poison Control Center, FCM, UNICAMP, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Search for other papers by José Luiz Costa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rafael Lanaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Antônio Silva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Izabel Chiamolera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Laboratory of Human Molecular Genetics, Center for Molecular Biology and Genetics Engineering (CBMEG), UNICAMP, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Search for other papers by Maricilda Palandi de Mello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by André Moreno Morcillo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, FCM, UNICAMP, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Search for other papers by Andrea Trevas Maciel-Guerra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pediatrics, FCM, UNICAMP, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Search for other papers by Gil Guerra-Junior in
Google Scholar
PubMed
1 Honour JW Steroid assays in paediatric endocrinology . Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology 2010 2 1 – 16 . ( https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.v2i1.1 ) 21274330 2 Dekkers OM Horváth-Puhó E Cannegieter SC
