Search for other papers by Hong Tang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiaomei Jiang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yu Hua in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Heyue Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chunlan Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiaobai Hao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Minhui Yi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Linxia Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-phosphate dehydrogenase) (1:5000, Abcam, ab9485). The membranes were washed with TBST (TBS with Tween-20) for three times after incubation with primary antibodies for 2 h. Thereafter, membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) (1:5000, ab
Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Search for other papers by Li Qian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuxiao Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yan Luo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mu Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liping Yu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yu Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tao Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-risk autoantibodies and greatly improve sensitivity and disease specificity. Moreover, ECL assays, which capture all of the immunoglobulin classes (IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgE), are more sensitive than ELISA, which captures only IgG. More importantly, previous studies have
Search for other papers by A Daniel Bird in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Spencer Greatorex in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Reser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Gareth G Lavery in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Timothy J Cole in
Google Scholar
PubMed
immunostained with primary antibodies (rabbit anti-GRP78 and a mouse anti-HSD1L monoclonal antibody produced in the laboratory to a hHSD1L peptide), then washed and detected with secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit IgG alexa-488 and anti-mouse IgG2a alexa-555
Search for other papers by Doron Weinstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rive Sarfstein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zvi Laron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Haim Werner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
antibodies were HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:50 000) and donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:25 000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA). Proteins were detected using the SuperSignal West PicoChemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce, Rockford
Search for other papers by Qing Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jianbin Su in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xueqin Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mengjie Tang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yingying Gao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dongmei Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.25(0.40–79.8) 0.10(0.10–0.25) < 0.001 Thyroid VolT (mL) 16.9(12.5–22.5) n – IgG (g/L) 14.1 ± 3.88 13.3 ± 2.19 0.562 IgM (g/L) 1.19 ± 0.57 1.36 ± 0.58 0.171 IgA (g/L) 2.02(1.61–2.69) 2.16(1.64–2.95) 0.311 C3
Search for other papers by Ming Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bingxin Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Meng Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shangyun Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yue Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chao Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Interaction of MRAP2 proteins with slMCa or slMCb. Co-IP of slMCa or slMCb with four types of MRAP2 proteins: (A and B) slMRAP2, (C and D) esMRAP2-C, (E and F) zMRAP2a-C and (G and H). *IgG heavy chain. (I) Schematic diagram of four MRAP2 plasmids. N terminus
Search for other papers by I Savchuk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M L Morvan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J P Antignac in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Gemzell-Danielsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B Le Bizec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Söder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Svechnikov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
5αR1 ( Table 2 ) or unspecific IgGs (for negative control) dissolved in 3% goat serum in PBS overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS and 0.01% Tween 20, the slides were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody (ab64256, Abcam), and then with
Search for other papers by Estíbaliz Castillero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana Isabel Martín in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Paz Nieto-Bona in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carmen Fernández-Galaz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María López-Menduiña in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María Ángeles Villanúa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Asunción López-Calderón in
Google Scholar
PubMed
–Aldrich) with stripping of membranes before each new antibody. Membranes were then incubated for 90 min in the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to HRP (antimouse IgG, Amersham Biosciences; antirabbit IgG, Bio-Rad), and peroxidase activity was detected
Search for other papers by Elvira C Arellanes-Licea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by José Ávila-Mendoza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth C Ramírez-Martínez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eugenia Ramos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nancy Uribe-González in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos Arámburo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Teresa Morales in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maricela Luna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
antibody was detected by using a Cy3-goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Abcam; 1:5000), the labeled sections were placed with DAPI (Sigma, D-9542, at a final concentration of 0.1 µg/mL) stocks solution and washed. The sections were mounted, dehydrated
Search for other papers by Thorben Hoffmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Search for other papers by Yousef Ashraf Tawfik Morcos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ruth Janoschek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eva-Maria Turnwald in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Search for other papers by Antje Gerken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annette Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Cologne Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics (CCMB), Cologne, Germany
Search for other papers by Gerhard Sengle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jörg Dötsch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Appel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eva Hucklenbruch-Rother in
Google Scholar
PubMed
secondary antibody (polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse IgG-HRP conjugate P026002-2 (Agilent Dako) was added 1:2000 in 2.5% milk/PBS for 30 min at RT. The plate was washed again and 1-Step™ Ultra TMB-ELISA Substrate Solution (Thermo Scientific) was added and