Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Pernille H Hellmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Clinical Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jonatan I Bagger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katrine R Carlander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katrine B Hansen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie L Forman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joachim Størling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizaveta Chabanova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jens Holst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Clinical Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Search for other papers by Tina Vilsbøll in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Clinical Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Filip K Knop in
Google Scholar
PubMed
mean of the −15 min and the 0 min values (The HOMA2 Calculator © version 2.2.3, The University of Oxford 2004–2021) ( https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/ ). Detailed calculations of study power, oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS
Search for other papers by Cristina Romei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Teresa Ramone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chiara Mulè in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Prete in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Virginia Cappagli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Loredana Lorusso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liborio Torregrossa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fulvio Basolo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raffaele Ciampi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rossella Elisei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
high power magnification (original magnification, ×40) with the highest apparent Ki67 index was selected. The Ki67 score was defined as the percentage of positive cells among a minimum of 100 neoplastic cells. The results were scored according to the
Search for other papers by Justyna Modrzynska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christine F Klein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kasper Iversen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Henning Bundgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Bolette Hartmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maike Mose in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nikolaj Rittig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niels Møller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jens J Holst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the individuals served as their own control. This approach enhances the power to identify statistically significant changes in plasma concentrations of glucagon, GLP-1 and CRP over time and helps to avoid potentially confounding inter
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jes Sloth Mathiesen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jens Peter Kroustrup in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Steno Diabetes Center North Jutland, Aalborg, Denmark
Search for other papers by Peter Vestergaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per Løgstrup Poulsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Åse Krogh Rasmussen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sten Schytte in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano Christian Londero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Henrik Baymler Pedersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoffer Holst Hahn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jens Bentzen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Odense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Sören Möller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mette Gaustadnes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Rossing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Finn Cilius Nielsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kim Brixen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Godballe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Danish Thyroid Cancer Group (DATHYRCA) in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Limitations Our sample size is relatively small, providing lesser statistical power to detect differences in survival among the stage groups. We cannot exclude that this was the case for stage II vs III under the proposed TNM groupings. However, it was no
Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
Search for other papers by Emmanuelle Noirrit in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mélissa Buscato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marion Dupuis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
CHU de Toulouse, Laboratoire d’Hématologie, Toulouse, France
Search for other papers by Bernard Payrastre in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Coralie Fontaine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean-François Arnal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
Search for other papers by Marie-Cécile Valera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg, 3 women (0.2%) developed deep vein thrombosis and one (0.1%) in placebo ( 31 , 32 ). Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm this low incidence. Again, lack of statistical power of these trials combined with the fact
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Meena Asmar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Ali Asmar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lene Simonsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Geriatrics, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Flemming Dela in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jens Juul Holst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jens Bülow in
Google Scholar
PubMed
coefficient (λ) for 133 Xenon. Sample size was determined before the study using power analysis ( P = 0.8, α = 0.05) with regard to ATBF responses based on our previous publications ( 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 , 14 ). Assuming an ATBF response as found previously
Search for other papers by Sweta Budyal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Swati Sachin Jadhav in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rajeev Kasaliwal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hiren Patt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shruti Khare in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vyankatesh Shivane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anurag R Lila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tushar Bandgar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nalini S Shah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
(false negative) to as low as 6%, signifying that the study is adequately powered to account for such a negative result. Most studies have selected the patients on the basis of higher BMI, higher HbA1c, the presence of hypertension or involved
Search for other papers by Majunath R Goroshi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Swati S Jadhav in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anurag R Lila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rajeev Kasaliwal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shruti Khare in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chaitanya G Yerawar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Priya Hira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Uday Phadke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hina Shah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vikram R Lele in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gaurav Malhotra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tushar Bandgar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nalini S Shah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
) injected with a mechanical power injector at a rate of 2.7mL/s. Scanning from the neck to the pelvis was performed at baseline and 60s after initiation of contrast infusion. 68 Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scan was an additional imaging test for all patients. 68 Ga
Search for other papers by Roxanne C S van Adrichem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aart Jan van der Lely in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Huisman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piet Kramer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patric J D Delhanty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter W de Herder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
diagnostic biomarkers in patients with NETs. Although the study was performed with a relatively small group of NET patients, we suspect that lack of power does not play a major role in our study. We have also shown in this paper that incorrect processing of
Search for other papers by Elena Pardi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano Mariotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalia S Pellegata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katiuscia Benfini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simona Borsari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federica Saponaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liborio Torregrossa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonello Cappai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chiara Satta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco Mastinu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudio Marcocci in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Filomena Cetani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
under high-power magnification (×20) were chosen. In each experiment, adjacent normal parenchyma and/or infiltrating lymphocytes served as an internal positive control. Two specimens of normal parathyroid gland, inadvertently removed from normocalcemic