Search Results
Search for other papers by Qiuli Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gang Yuan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dali Tong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gaolei Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuting Yi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jun Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yao Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lin-ang Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luofu Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dianzheng Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rongrong Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yanfang Guan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xin Yi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Weihua Lan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jun Jiang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Context
Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease manifests as a variety of benign and malignant neoplasms. Previous studies of VHL disease have documented several genotype–phenotype correlations; however, many such correlations are still unknown. Increased identification of new mutations and patients with previously described mutations will allow us to better understand how VHL mutations influence disease phenotypes.
Patients and design
A total of 45 individuals from five unrelated families were evaluated, of which 21 patients were either diagnosed with VHL disease or showed strong evidence related to this disease. We compared the patients’ gene sequencing results with their medical records including CT or MRI scans, eye examinations and laboratory/pathological examinations. Patients were also interviewed to obtain information regarding their family history.
Results
We identified four missense mutations: c.239G>T (p.Ser80Ile), linked with VHL Type 2B, was associated with renal cell carcinoma, pheochromocytoma and hemangioma in the cerebellum; c.232A>T (p.Asn78Tyr) manifested as RCC alone and likely caused VHL Type 1; c.500G>A (p.Arg167Gln) mutation was more likely to cause VHL Type 2 than Type 1 as it preferentially induced Pheo and HB in the retina, cerebellum and spinal cord; c.293A>G (p.Try98Cys) was associated with Pheo and thus likely induced VHL Type 2.
Conclusions
Characterizing VHL disease genotype–phenotype correlations can enhance the ability to predict the risk of individual patients developing different VHL-related phenotypes. Ultimately, such insight will improve the diagnostics, surveillance and treatment of VHL patients.
Precis
Four missense mutations in VHL have been identified in 21 individuals when five unrelated Chinese families with VHL disease were analyzed; VHL mutations are highly associated with unique disease phenotypes.
