Search Results
Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Search for other papers by Wentao Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiantao Kuang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xu Han in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenqi Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xuefeng Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenhui Lou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dansong Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objectives
Systemic inflammation markers have been demonstrated to be associated with prognosis in various tumors. In this study, we aimed to assess the value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index and the counts of lymphocyte, monocyte and neutrophil in predicting prognosis among patients with resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs).
Methods
A total of 174 patients were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive roles of inflammation markers for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in pNEN patients.
Results
The optimal cut-off values of NLR, LMR and lymphocyte count were 1.9, 5.0 and 1.4 × 109/L, respectively, determined by the X-tile software. RFS was found to be significantly longer in patients with NLR ≤1.9 (P = 0.041), LMR >5.0 (P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count >1.4 × 109/L (P = 0.002) in comparison to those with NLR >1.9, LMR ≤5.0 and lymphocyte count ≤1.4 × 109/L, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that LMR (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.11–0.85, P = 0.023) was an independent predictor for RFS, but not NLR or lymphocyte count. For long-term survival analysis, patients with NLR ≤1.9 (P = 0.016) were found to be associated with favorable OS, but NLR was not an independent factor validated by multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Preoperative LMR is an independent systemic inflammation marker to predict relapses in pNEN patients who underwent curative resections, whose clinical value needs to be verified in further large sample-based prospective studies.
Search for other papers by Yang Lv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xu Han in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chunyan Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuan Fang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ning Pu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuan Ji in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dansong Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xu Xuefeng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenhui Lou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
Chromogranin A (CgA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are important markers for neuroendocrine tumors; however, the clinical value of combining these markers has not been well studied. In this study, we investigated the utility of each marker individually and in combination for patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs).
Patients and Methods
In this study, NF-pNET patients and controls were recruited from December 2011 to March 2016; 784 serum samples from peripheral vein were collected. The clinical characteristics and biomarker values of all the individuals were recorded and analyzed. Tumor burdens were calculated by CT/MRI scan. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic predictive values; sensitivity and specificity were calculated to determine the cut-off value. Therapeutic responses reflected on the changes of the biomarkers’ concentration were assessed by the RECIST criterion. Clinical relations between the prognosis and the biomarker values were also analyzed. Statistical significance was defined as P value less than 0.05.
Results
Among the 167 NF-pNETs patients, 82 were males (49.1%) and the mean age was 50.0 (17.4). The mean CgA values of G1, G2 and G3 NF-pNENs were 75, 121 and 134 μg/L (P < 0.05), respectively. In NF-pNETs, CgA correlated with the WHO tumor grade (WHO G1 vs G2, P < 0.05); the linear regression relationships were found between the tumor burdens (both in pancreas and liver) and CgA concentration (P < 0.001); changes in CgA and NSE concentrations also reflect treatment response (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
CgA and NSE are important diagnostic and follow-up markers in patients with NF-pNETs. The combined monitoring of CgA and NSE possesses more accuracy than individual values of CgA and NSE at predicting prognosis and disease progression.
Search for other papers by Yang Lv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ning Pu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei-lin Mao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wen-qi Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Huan-yu Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xu Han in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuan Ji in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lei Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Da-yong Jin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wen-Hui Lou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xue-feng Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Aim
We aim to investigate the clinical characteristics of the rectal NECs and the prognosis-related factors and construct a nomogram for prognosis prediction.
Methods
The data of 41 patients and 1028 patients with rectal NEC were retrieved respectively from our institution and SEER database. OS or PFS was defined as the major study outcome. Variables were compared by chi-square test and t-test when appropriate. Kaplan–Meier analysis with log-rank test was used for survival analysis and the Cox regression analysis was applied. The nomogram integrating risk factors for predicting OS was constructed by R to achieve superior discriminatory ability. Predictive utility of the nomogram was determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve.
Results
In the univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor differentiation, N stage, M stage and resection of primary site were identified as independent prognostic indicators. The linear regression relationship was found between the value of Ki-67 index and the duration of OS (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the independent prognostic factors were added to formulate prognostic nomogram. The constructed nomogram showed good performance according to the C-index.
Conclusions
Contrary to WHO classification guideline, we found that the rectal NEC diseases are heterogeneous and should be divided as different categories according to the pathological differentiation. Besides, the nomogram formulated in this study showed excellent discriminative capability to predict OS for those patients. More advanced predictive model for this disease is required to assist risk stratification via the formulated nomogram.
Search for other papers by Xu Han in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xuefeng Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hongyun Ma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuan Ji in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dansong Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiantao Kuang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenchuan Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bin Song in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gang Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gang Jin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenhui Lou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
Emerging evidence suggests G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) present heterogeneous morphology and biology. The 2017 WHO classification has introduced a new category of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WD-pNETs) G3, compared with poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD-pNECs) G3. We aim to analysis the demographics and outcomes of patients with resectable 2017 WHO G3 pNENs to facilitate the distinction between two entities.
Methods
The multi-institutional retrospective cohort involving 57 surgically treated patients affected by 2017 WHO G3 pNENs were morphologically identified and clinically analyzed. Patients having WD-pNETs G3 and those having PD-pNECs G3 were compared.
Results
Thirty patients had WD-pNETs and 27 patients had PD-pNECs. The distributions of Ki-67 and mitotic count in patients with PD-pNECs or WD-pNETs showed remarkable disparities. ROC indicated cut-off value of Ki-67 was 45. PD-pNECs were more common in patients with elevated Ki-67 and mitotic count, advanced AJCC TNM stage, vascular invasion, regional lymph-node metastases, elevated NSE and decreased CgA levels compared with WD-pNETs (P < 0.05). The association between 2017 WHO G3 grade and TTR was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis indicated OS rates were associated with morphologic differentiation (WD-pNETs vs PD-pNECs), Ki-67, TNM staging, synchronous distant metastases, initial treatments, vascular invasion, regional lymph nodes metastases, mitotic count and age (P < 0.05). Multivariate analyses illustrated Ki-67, differentiation, TNM staging and vascular invasion were independent predictors (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
PD-pNECs G3 presented malignant biological behavior and dismal outcome compared with WD-pNETs G3. These findings challenge 2010 WHO classification and suggest the categorization can be improved by refined tumor grading.
