Search Results
Center for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Kjersti S Bakken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Microbiology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway
Search for other papers by Kristina Randjelovic Nermo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Bjørn Gunnar Nedrebø in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tim I M Korevaar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway
Search for other papers by Tor A Strand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Thyroid disease during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and suboptimal fetal development. During the last decades, guidelines for diagnosing thyroid disease during pregnancy have changed considerably and there has been increased awareness. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of thyroid disease treatment over time among pregnant women in Norway.
Design
Nationwide register-based study.
Methods
We combined historical data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Prescription Database, identifying pregnant women using thyroid therapy from 2004 to 2018.
Results
A total of 855,067 pregnancies were included in the analyses. The proportion of women using thyroid hormone replacement therapy during pregnancy increased from 1.46% (n = 800) in 2004 to 3.57% (n = 1940) in 2018. The proportion of women using antithyroid medications also increased from 0.04% (n = 20) in 2004 to 0.10% (n = 56). During these 15 years, the mean maternal age increased by 0.9 years. When adjusting for age, the risk for being on thyroid hormone replacement therapy during pregnancy increased by an average of 5% per year (odds ratio: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.05–1.05).
Conclusion
During the recent 15 years, there has been a substantial increase in the use of thyroid hormone therapy in Norwegian pregnant women. We speculate that this could be due to an increased awareness in combination with overdiagnosis because of inappropriate diagnostic criteria. To truly understand the possible causes and consequences of this development, further research is warranted.
