Search Results
Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Search for other papers by Wentao Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiantao Kuang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xu Han in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenqi Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xuefeng Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenhui Lou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dansong Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objectives
Systemic inflammation markers have been demonstrated to be associated with prognosis in various tumors. In this study, we aimed to assess the value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index and the counts of lymphocyte, monocyte and neutrophil in predicting prognosis among patients with resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs).
Methods
A total of 174 patients were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive roles of inflammation markers for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in pNEN patients.
Results
The optimal cut-off values of NLR, LMR and lymphocyte count were 1.9, 5.0 and 1.4 × 109/L, respectively, determined by the X-tile software. RFS was found to be significantly longer in patients with NLR ≤1.9 (P = 0.041), LMR >5.0 (P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count >1.4 × 109/L (P = 0.002) in comparison to those with NLR >1.9, LMR ≤5.0 and lymphocyte count ≤1.4 × 109/L, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that LMR (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.11–0.85, P = 0.023) was an independent predictor for RFS, but not NLR or lymphocyte count. For long-term survival analysis, patients with NLR ≤1.9 (P = 0.016) were found to be associated with favorable OS, but NLR was not an independent factor validated by multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Preoperative LMR is an independent systemic inflammation marker to predict relapses in pNEN patients who underwent curative resections, whose clinical value needs to be verified in further large sample-based prospective studies.
Search for other papers by Xu Han in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xuefeng Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hongyun Ma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuan Ji in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dansong Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiantao Kuang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenchuan Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bin Song in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gang Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gang Jin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenhui Lou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
Emerging evidence suggests G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) present heterogeneous morphology and biology. The 2017 WHO classification has introduced a new category of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WD-pNETs) G3, compared with poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD-pNECs) G3. We aim to analysis the demographics and outcomes of patients with resectable 2017 WHO G3 pNENs to facilitate the distinction between two entities.
Methods
The multi-institutional retrospective cohort involving 57 surgically treated patients affected by 2017 WHO G3 pNENs were morphologically identified and clinically analyzed. Patients having WD-pNETs G3 and those having PD-pNECs G3 were compared.
Results
Thirty patients had WD-pNETs and 27 patients had PD-pNECs. The distributions of Ki-67 and mitotic count in patients with PD-pNECs or WD-pNETs showed remarkable disparities. ROC indicated cut-off value of Ki-67 was 45. PD-pNECs were more common in patients with elevated Ki-67 and mitotic count, advanced AJCC TNM stage, vascular invasion, regional lymph-node metastases, elevated NSE and decreased CgA levels compared with WD-pNETs (P < 0.05). The association between 2017 WHO G3 grade and TTR was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis indicated OS rates were associated with morphologic differentiation (WD-pNETs vs PD-pNECs), Ki-67, TNM staging, synchronous distant metastases, initial treatments, vascular invasion, regional lymph nodes metastases, mitotic count and age (P < 0.05). Multivariate analyses illustrated Ki-67, differentiation, TNM staging and vascular invasion were independent predictors (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
PD-pNECs G3 presented malignant biological behavior and dismal outcome compared with WD-pNETs G3. These findings challenge 2010 WHO classification and suggest the categorization can be improved by refined tumor grading.
