Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author: Sarah M Creighton x
Clear All Modify Search
Jennifer K Y Ko Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Jennifer K Y Ko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas F J King Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Thomas F J King in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Louise Williams Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Louise Williams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sarah M Creighton Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sarah M Creighton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Gerard S Conway Department of Women’s Health, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Gerard S Conway in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Objective

To review the treatment choices of women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) at a single tertiary centre.

Design

Retrospective review.

Patients

Women with CAIS identified from our database.

Results

The study group comprised 141 women with CAIS. Eleven percent (16/141) of women had gonads in situ, 3 of whom were under workup for gonadectomy. The age of gonadectomy in the remainder 125 women was 17 (0.1–53) years. The most common form of HRT was oral oestrogen or transdermal oestrogen in 80% (113/141). 13/141 (9%) women used vaginal oestrogens alone or together with other forms of HRT. Testosterone preparations had been used by 17% (24/141) of women and were currently used in 10% (14/141). Of those who had used testosterone, 42% (10/24) had chosen not to continue after a therapeutic trial.

Conclusions

In a clinic offering individualised multidisciplinary care for women with CAIS, we found that the majority of women chose oestrogen-based treatment while a significant minority used testosterone.

Open access