Search Results
Search for other papers by M Ahmid in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C G Perry in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M G Shaikh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Until quite recently, the management of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) had focussed on the use of recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy to normalise final adult height. However, research over the past two decades that has demonstrated deficits in bone health and cardiac function, as well as impaired quality of life in adults with childhood-onset GHD (CO-GHD), has questioned this practice. Some of these studies suggested that there may be short-term benefits of rhGH in certain group of adolescents with GHD during transition, although the impact of GHD and replacement during the transition period has not been adequately investigated and its long-term benefits remain unclear. GH therapy remains expensive and well-designed long-term studies are needed to determine the cost effectiveness and clinical benefit of ongoing rhGH during transition and further into adulthood. In the absence of compelling data to justify widespread continuation of rhGH into adult life, there are several questions related to its use that remain unanswered. This paper reviews the effects of growth hormone deficiency on bone health, cardiovascular function, metabolic profile and quality of life during transition and young adulthood.
Faculty of Medicine Division 2, Internal Medicine Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by E K White in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I V Wagner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine Division 2, Internal Medicine Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by C van Beuzekom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Iotova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatrics, UMHAT ‘Sveta Marina’ Varna, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In 2017, the European Commission installed 24 European Reference Networks (ERNs) for different categories of rare and complex conditions to facilitate cross-border health care via virtual case consultations in a secure Clinical Patient Management System (CPMS). The ERN for rare endocrine conditions (Endo-ERN) previously reviewed the CPMS, in which they detailed the difficulties physicians encountered with the system and proposed solutions to these that should enable the system to be used to a greater extent. This paper will further the endeavor of the first by performing a critical evaluation of the CPMS, assessing how these suggested improvements have been implemented, and if these have affected the usage of the system. The evaluation involves an assessment of CPMS usage statistics since its conception that takes into consideration the technical updates and the external factors that may have affected these, including data from a review survey following a training workshop for our new healthcare providers (HCPs) added in January 2022. It appears that the improvements made to the system since the first review, in particular the implementation of the Operational Helpdesk, have had a positive effect in increasing CPMS membership; however, the regular usage of the system continues to fluctuate. Several suggestions are made on how to further facilitate the use of CPMS by our members both individually and network-wide, by integrating CPMS activities with other network initiatives and further integrating these into national health care systems as well as looking for ways to measure patient satisfaction from the CPMS discussions outcomes.
Search for other papers by M Cherenko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N M Appelman-Dijkstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A L Priego Zurita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N R Biermasz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O M Dekkers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F A Klok in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Aulinas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B Biagetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Cannavo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Canu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Detomas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Devuyst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Falhammar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Ferrau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Gatto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Grasselli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P van Houten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Hoybye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A M Isidori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Kyrilli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P Loli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Maiter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Nowak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Pivonello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Ragnarsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R V Steenaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Unger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A van de Ven in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S M Webb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Yeste in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Glasgow, Office for Rare Conditions, Glasgow, UK
University of Glasgow, Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Patients with Cushing syndrome (CS) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Objective
The aim was to evaluate the current management of new cases of CS with a focus on VTE and thromboprophylaxis.
Design and methods
A survey was conducted within those that report in the electronic reporting tool (e-REC) of the European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions (EuRRECa) and the involved main thematic groups (MTG’s) of the European Reference Networks for Rare Endocrine Disorders (Endo-ERN) on new patients with CS from January 2021 to July 2022.
Results
Of 222 patients (mean age 44 years, 165 females), 141 patients had Cushing disease (64%), 69 adrenal CS (31%), and 12 patients with ectopic CS (5.4%). The mean follow-up period post-CS diagnosis was 15 months (range 3–30). Cortisol-lowering medications were initiated in 38% of patients. One hundred fifty-four patients (69%) received thromboprophylaxis (including patients on chronic anticoagulant treatment), of which low-molecular-weight heparins were used in 96% of cases. VTE was reported in six patients (2.7%), of which one was fatal: two long before CS diagnosis, two between diagnosis and surgery, and two postoperatively. Three patients were using thromboprophylaxis at time of the VTE diagnosis. The incidence rate of VTE in patients after Cushing syndrome diagnosis in our study cohort was 14.6 (95% CI 5.5; 38.6) per 1000 person-years.
Conclusion
Thirty percent of patients with CS did not receive preoperative thromboprophylaxis during their active disease stage, and half of the VTE cases even occurred during this stage despite thromboprophylaxis. Prospective trials to establish the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy in CS patients are highly needed.
Significance statement
The incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in our study cohort was 14.6 (95% CI 5.5; 38.6) per 1000 person-years. Notably, this survey showed that there is great heterogeneity regarding time of initiation and duration of thromboprophylaxis in expert centers throughout Europe.
Search for other papers by Hanna F Nowotny in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jillian Bryce in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salma R Ali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Search for other papers by Roberta Giordano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Baronio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Irina Chifu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lea Tschaidse in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martine Cools in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erica LT van den Akker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other papers by Henrik Falhammar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan Italy
Search for other papers by Luca Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guglielmo Beccuti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ian L Ross in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other papers by Eystein S Husebye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefanie Hahner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Search for other papers by S Faisal Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicole Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Information on clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) infection in patients with adrenal disorders is scarce.
Methods
A collaboration between the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) Rare Disease Committee and European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions via the European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions allowed the collection of data on 64 cases (57 adrenal insufficiency (AI), 7 Cushing’s syndrome) that had been reported by 12 centres in 8 European countries between January 2020 and December 2021.
Results
Of all 64 patients, 23 were males and 41 females (13 of those children) with a median age of 37 and 51 years. In 45/57 (95%) AI cases, COVID-19 infection was confirmed by testing. Primary insufficiency was present in 45/57 patients; 19 were affected by Addison’s disease, 19 by congenital adrenal hyperplasia and 7 by primary AI (PAI) due to other causes. The most relevant comorbidities were hypertension (12%), obesity (n = 14%) and diabetes mellitus (9%). An increase by a median of 2.0 (IQR 1.4) times the daily replacement dose was reported in 42 (74%) patients. Two patients were administered i.m. injection of 100 mg hydrocortisone, and 11/64 were admitted to the hospital. Two patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit, one with a fatal outcome. Four patients reported persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, all others complete remission.
Conclusion
This European multicentre questionnaire is the first to collect data on the outcome of COVID-19 infection in patients with adrenal gland disorders. It suggests good clinical outcomes in case of duly dose adjustments and emphasizes the importance of patient education on sick day rules.
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Centre for Endocrine Tumors, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Department of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Centre Holland (UNCH), Leiden University Medical Centre, Haaglanden Medical Centre and Haga Teaching Hospitals, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Merel van der Meulen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana Luisa Priego Zurita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Faisal Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter R van Furth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Evangelia Charmandari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mehul Dattani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Diana Vitali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johan P de Graaf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nienke R Biermasz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN) aims to organize high-quality healthcare throughout Europe, including care for pituitary adenoma patients. As surgery is the mainstay of treatment, we aimed to describe the current surgical practice and published surgical outcomes of pituitary adenoma within Endo-ERN.
Design and Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting surgical outcomes of pituitary adenoma patients within Endo-ERN MTG6 pituitary reference centers between 2010 and 2019. A survey was completed by reference centers on their current surgical practice.
Results
A total of 18 out of 43 (42%) reference centers located in 7 of the 20 (35%) MTG6-represented countries published 48 articles. Remission rates were 50% (95% CI: 42–59) for patients with acromegaly, 68% (95% CI: 60–75) for Cushing’s disease, and 53% (95% CI: 39–66%) for prolactinoma. Gross total resection was achieved in 49% (95% CI: 37–61%) of patients and visual improvement in 78% (95% CI: 68–87). Mortality, hemorrhage, and carotid injury occurred in less than 1% of patients. New-onset hypopituitarism occurred in 16% (95% CI: 11–23), transient diabetes insipidus in 12% (95% CI: 6–21), permanent diabetes insipidus in 4% (95% CI: 3–6), syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) in 9% (95% CI: 5–14), severe epistaxis in 2% (95% CI: 0–4), and cerebrospinal fluid leak in 4% (95% CI: 2–6). Thirty-five (81%) centers completed the survey: 54% were operated endoscopically and 57% were together with an ENT surgeon.
Conclusion
The results of this study could be used as a first benchmark for the outcomes of pituitary adenoma surgery within Endo-ERN. However, the heterogeneity between studies in the reporting of outcomes hampers comparability and warrants outcome collection through registries.
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital/ University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by S C Clement in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by W E Visser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by C A Lebbink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Albano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H L Claahsen-van der Grinten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Czarniecka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by R P Dias in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M P Dierselhuis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I Dzivite-Krisane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Elisei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Garcia-Burillo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Izatt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Kanaka-Gantenbein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Krude in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Lamartina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Lorenz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Luster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Navardauskaitė in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Negre Busó in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Newbold in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R P Peeters in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Pellegriti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Piccardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A L Priego in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Redlich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L de Sanctis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Sobrinho-Simões in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A S P van Trotsenburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F A Verburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Vriens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T P Links in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Office for Rare Conditions, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by H M van Santen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Although differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is the most frequent endocrine pediatric cancer, it is rare in childhood and adolescence. While tumor persistence and recurrence are not uncommon, mortality remains extremely low. Complications of treatment are however reported in up to 48% of the survivors. Due to the rarity of the disease, current treatment guidelines are predominantly based on the results of small observational retrospective studies and extrapolations from results in adult patients. In order to develop more personalized treatment and follow-up strategies (aiming to reduce complication rates), there is an unmet need for uniform international prospective data collection and clinical trials.
Methods and analysis
The European pediatric thyroid carcinoma registry aims to collect clinical data for all patients ≤18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of DTC who have been diagnosed, assessed, or treated at a participating site. This registry will be a component of the wider European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions project which has close links to Endo-ERN, the European Reference Network for Rare Endocrine Conditions. A multidisciplinary expert working group was formed to develop a minimal dataset comprising information regarding demographic data, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. We constructed an umbrella-type registry, with a detailed basic dataset. In the future, this may provide the opportunity for research teams to integrate clinical research questions.
Ethics and dissemination
Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and/or their parents/guardians. Summaries and descriptive analyses of the registry will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
Office for Rare Conditions, Royal Hospital for Children & Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Search for other papers by S R Ali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Bryce in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A L Priego-Zurita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Cherenko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Smythe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T M de Rooij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
Search for other papers by M Cools in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Danne in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Katugampola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by O M Dekkers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Linglart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I Netchine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Nordenstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P Attila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by L Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Smyth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Z Sumnik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Taruscio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by W E Visser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by A M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N M Appelman-Dijkstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Office for Rare Conditions, Royal Hospital for Children & Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions (EuRRECa, eurreb.eu) includes an e-reporting registry (e-REC) used to perform surveillance of conditions within the European Reference Network (ERN) for rare endocrine conditions (Endo-ERN). The aim of this study was to report the experience of e-REC over the 3.5 years since its launch in 2018.
Methods
Electronic reporting capturing new encounters of Endo-ERN conditions was performed monthly through a bespoke platform by clinicians registered to participate in e-REC from July 2018 to December 2021.
Results
The number of centres reporting on e-REC increased to a total of 61 centres from 22 countries. A median of 29 (range 11, 45) paediatric and 32 (14, 51) adult centres had reported cases monthly. A total of 9715 and 4243 new cases were reported in adults (age ≥18 years) and children, respectively. In children, sex development conditions comprised 40% of all reported conditions and transgender cases were most frequently reported, comprising 58% of sex development conditions. The median number of sex development cases reported per centre per month was 0.6 (0, 38). Amongst adults, pituitary conditions comprised 44% of reported conditions and pituitary adenomas (69% of cases) were most commonly reported. The median number of pituitary cases reported per centre per month was 4 (0.4, 33).
Conclusions
e-REC has gained increasing acceptability over the last 3.5 years for capturing brief information on new encounters of rare conditions and shows wide variations in the rate of presentation of these conditions to centres within a reference network.
Significance statement
Endocrinology includes a very wide range of rare conditions and their occurrence is often difficult to measure. By using an electronic platform that allowed monthly reporting of new clinical encounters of several rare endocrine conditions within a defined network that consisted of several reference centres in Europe, the EuRRECa project shows that a programme of e-surveillance is feasible and acceptable. The data that have been collected by the e-reporting of rare endocrine conditions (e-REC) can allow the continuous monitoring of rare conditions and may be used for clinical benchmarking, designing new studies or recruiting to clinical trials.
