Search Results
Search for other papers by Shams Ali Baig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Kashish Malhotra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anagh Josh Banerjee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mukunth Kowsik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Khushi Kumar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fazna Rahman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Syeda Sabbah Batul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mohammed Faraaz Saiyed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vardhan Venkatesh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pranav Viswanath Iyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Punith Kempegowda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
YouTube® is one of the leading platforms for health information. However, the lack of regulation of content and quality raises concerns about accuracy and reliability. CoMICs (Concise Medical Information Cines) are evidence-based short videos created by medical students and junior doctors and reviewed by experts to ensure clinical accuracy. We performed a systematic review to understand the impact of videos on knowledge and awareness about diabetes and PCOS. We then evaluated the quality of YouTube® videos about diabetes and PCOS using various validated quality assessment tools and compared these with CoMICs videos on the same topics. Quality assessment tools like DISCERN, JAMA benchmark criteria, and global quality scale (GQS) score were employed. Some of the authors of this study also co-authored the creation of some of the CoMICs evaluated. Our study revealed that while videos effectively improve understanding of diabetes and PCOS, there are notable differences in quality and reliability of the videos on YouTube®. For diabetes, CoMICs videos had higher DISCERN scores (CoMICs vs YouTube®: 2.4 vs 1.6), superior reliability (P < 0.01), and treatment quality (P < 0.01) and met JAMA criteria for authorship (100% vs 30.6%) and currency (100% vs 53.1%). For PCOS, CoMICs had higher DISCERN scores (2.9 vs 1.9), reliability (P < 0.01), and treatment quality (P < 0.01); met JAMA criteria for authorship (100% vs 34.0%) and currency (100% vs 54.0%); and had higher GQS scores (4.0 vs 3.0). In conclusion, CoMICs outperformed other similar sources on YouTube® in providing reliable evidence-based medical information which may be used for patient education.
Search for other papers by Meghnaa Hebbar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Halimah Khalil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nawal Zia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jameela Sheikh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eka Melson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Meri Davitadze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helena Gleeson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tejal Lathia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chitra Selvan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Search for other papers by Punith Kempegowda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by PCOS SEva Working Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
With increasing evidence of emotional well-being disorders associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), effective screening processes are of utmost importance. We studied the impact of using questionnaires to screen for emotional and psychosexual well-being across different models of care for PCOS. We analysed the data from the surveys to assess the difference in the prevalence of emotional and psychosexual ill-being across ethnicity and region. In this prospective cohort study, we invited all women attending consultations for PCOS in Birmingham, UK, and Bengaluru and Navi Mumbai, India. Those who consented to participate in the study were invited to complete a pre-clinic survey about socio-demographic data, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), Beliefs about Obese Person scale (BAOP), and Female Sexual Function Index score (FSFI) and a post-clinic survey on clinic experience, lifestyle advice, and specialist referral. A total of 115 women were included in this study. The rate of questionnaire completion was 98.3% (113/115), 97.4% (112/115), 93.04% (107/115), and 84.3% (97/115) for HADS, BICI, BAOP, and FSFI, respectively. In the post-clinic survey, 28.8% reported they were screened for anxiety, 27.1% for depression, and 45.8% for body image concerns. The prevalence of anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphic disorder through pre-clinic survey was 56.5% (50.0% UK vs 59.5% India, P = 0.483), 16.5% (13.9% UK vs 17.7% India, P = 0.529), and 29.6% (36.1% UK vs 26.6% India, P = 0.208), respectively. Surveys with validated questionnaires can improve screening for emotional and psychosexual well-being associated with PCOS which may be missed by ad hoc screening during consultations.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Punith Kempegowda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Eka Melson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnes Johnson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lucy Wallett in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lucretia Thomas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dengyi Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Catherine Holmes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agata Juszczak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mohammed Ali Karamat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sandip Ghosh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wasim Hanif in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Parth Narendran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Srikanth Bellary in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
COVID-19 in people with diabetes is associated with a disproportionately worse prognosis. DKA is an acute complication of diabetes with a mortality rate of approximately 0.67%. Little is known about the natural history of DKA in the presence of COVID-19. This study aimed to explore the effects of COVID-19 on presentation, clinical course and outcome in patients presenting with DKA.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Methods
All patients treated for DKA between 1 March 2020 and 30 May 2020 were included. Patients were categorised as COVID-positive or COVID-negative based on the swab test. A pre-COVID group was established using data from 01 March 2019 to 30 May 2019 as external control. Data regarding demographics, diabetes type, pH, bicarbonate, lactate, glucose, DKA duration, complications and outcome were collected.
Results
A total of 88 DKA episodes were included in this study. There was no significant difference in the severity or duration of DKA between the three groups. COVID-positive T1DM were more hyperglycaemic on admission compared to COVID-negative and pre-COVID patients. There was an over representation of T2DM in COVID-positive patients with DKA than in pre-COVID or COVID-negative groups.
Conclusion
COVID-19 appears to influence the natural history of DKA differently in T1DM and T2DM. Patients with T1DM and COVID-19 presented with more hyperglycaemia (60 mmol/L (35.9–60.0) vs 31.4 mmol/L (28.0–39.1) vs 24 mmol/L (20.2–33.75), respectively). Patients with T2DM were unusually presenting in DKA when infected with COVID-19 with greater ICU need and higher mortality rates. A collaborative, multi-centre study is needed to provide more definitive results.
