Search Results
Search for other papers by Dirk-Jan van Beek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel S van Leeuwaarde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carolina R C Pieterman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Menno R Vriens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Parelsnoer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Gerlof D Valk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by the DutchMEN Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rare diseases pose specific challenges in the field of medical research to provide physicians with evidence-based guidelines derived from studies with sufficient quality. An example of these rare diseases is multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), which is an autosomal dominant endocrine tumor syndrome with an estimated occurrence rate of 2–3 per 100,000. For this complex disease, characterized by multiple endocrine tumors, it proves difficult to perform both adequate and feasible studies. The opinion of patients themselves is of utmost importance to identify the gaps in the evidence-based medicine regarding clinical care. In the search for scientific answers to clinical research questions, the aim for best available evidence is obvious. Observational studies within patient cohorts, although prone to bias, seem the most feasible study design regarding the disease prevalence. Knowledge and adaptation to all types of bias is demanded in the strive for answers. Guided by our research on MEN1 patients, we elaborate on strategies to identify sufficient patients, to maximize and maintain patient enrolment and to standardize the data collection process. Preferably, data collection is performed prospectively, however, under certain conditions, data storage in a longitudinal retrospective database with a disease-specific framework is suitable. Considering the global challenges on observational research on rare diseases, we propose a stepwise approach from clinical research questions to scientific answers.
Search for other papers by M Cherenko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N M Appelman-Dijkstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A L Priego Zurita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N R Biermasz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O M Dekkers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F A Klok in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Aulinas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B Biagetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Cannavo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Canu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Detomas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Devuyst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Falhammar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R A Feelders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Ferrau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Gatto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Grasselli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P van Houten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Hoybye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A M Isidori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Kyrilli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P Loli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Maiter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Nowak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Pivonello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Ragnarsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R V Steenaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Unger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A van de Ven in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S M Webb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Yeste in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Glasgow, Office for Rare Conditions, Glasgow, UK
University of Glasgow, Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Patients with Cushing syndrome (CS) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Objective
The aim was to evaluate the current management of new cases of CS with a focus on VTE and thromboprophylaxis.
Design and methods
A survey was conducted within those that report in the electronic reporting tool (e-REC) of the European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions (EuRRECa) and the involved main thematic groups (MTG’s) of the European Reference Networks for Rare Endocrine Disorders (Endo-ERN) on new patients with CS from January 2021 to July 2022.
Results
Of 222 patients (mean age 44 years, 165 females), 141 patients had Cushing disease (64%), 69 adrenal CS (31%), and 12 patients with ectopic CS (5.4%). The mean follow-up period post-CS diagnosis was 15 months (range 3–30). Cortisol-lowering medications were initiated in 38% of patients. One hundred fifty-four patients (69%) received thromboprophylaxis (including patients on chronic anticoagulant treatment), of which low-molecular-weight heparins were used in 96% of cases. VTE was reported in six patients (2.7%), of which one was fatal: two long before CS diagnosis, two between diagnosis and surgery, and two postoperatively. Three patients were using thromboprophylaxis at time of the VTE diagnosis. The incidence rate of VTE in patients after Cushing syndrome diagnosis in our study cohort was 14.6 (95% CI 5.5; 38.6) per 1000 person-years.
Conclusion
Thirty percent of patients with CS did not receive preoperative thromboprophylaxis during their active disease stage, and half of the VTE cases even occurred during this stage despite thromboprophylaxis. Prospective trials to establish the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy in CS patients are highly needed.
Significance statement
The incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in our study cohort was 14.6 (95% CI 5.5; 38.6) per 1000 person-years. Notably, this survey showed that there is great heterogeneity regarding time of initiation and duration of thromboprophylaxis in expert centers throughout Europe.
Office for Rare Conditions, Royal Hospital for Children & Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Search for other papers by S R Ali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Bryce in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A L Priego-Zurita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Cherenko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Smythe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T M de Rooij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
Search for other papers by M Cools in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Danne in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Katugampola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by O M Dekkers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Linglart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I Netchine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Nordenstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P Attila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by L Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Smyth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Z Sumnik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Taruscio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by W E Visser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by A M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N M Appelman-Dijkstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Office for Rare Conditions, Royal Hospital for Children & Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions (EuRRECa, eurreb.eu) includes an e-reporting registry (e-REC) used to perform surveillance of conditions within the European Reference Network (ERN) for rare endocrine conditions (Endo-ERN). The aim of this study was to report the experience of e-REC over the 3.5 years since its launch in 2018.
Methods
Electronic reporting capturing new encounters of Endo-ERN conditions was performed monthly through a bespoke platform by clinicians registered to participate in e-REC from July 2018 to December 2021.
Results
The number of centres reporting on e-REC increased to a total of 61 centres from 22 countries. A median of 29 (range 11, 45) paediatric and 32 (14, 51) adult centres had reported cases monthly. A total of 9715 and 4243 new cases were reported in adults (age ≥18 years) and children, respectively. In children, sex development conditions comprised 40% of all reported conditions and transgender cases were most frequently reported, comprising 58% of sex development conditions. The median number of sex development cases reported per centre per month was 0.6 (0, 38). Amongst adults, pituitary conditions comprised 44% of reported conditions and pituitary adenomas (69% of cases) were most commonly reported. The median number of pituitary cases reported per centre per month was 4 (0.4, 33).
Conclusions
e-REC has gained increasing acceptability over the last 3.5 years for capturing brief information on new encounters of rare conditions and shows wide variations in the rate of presentation of these conditions to centres within a reference network.
Significance statement
Endocrinology includes a very wide range of rare conditions and their occurrence is often difficult to measure. By using an electronic platform that allowed monthly reporting of new clinical encounters of several rare endocrine conditions within a defined network that consisted of several reference centres in Europe, the EuRRECa project shows that a programme of e-surveillance is feasible and acceptable. The data that have been collected by the e-reporting of rare endocrine conditions (e-REC) can allow the continuous monitoring of rare conditions and may be used for clinical benchmarking, designing new studies or recruiting to clinical trials.
