Search Results
Department of Pediatrics, Navarra Hospital Complex, Pamplona, Spain
Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
Search for other papers by Teodoro Durá-Travé in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fidel Gallinas-Victoriano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María Malumbres-Chacon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lotfi Ahmed-Mohamed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
Search for other papers by María Jesús Chueca -Guindulain in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
Search for other papers by Sara Berrade-Zubiri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The objective of this study was to analyze whether some auxological characteristics or a single basal gonadotropin measurement will be sufficient to distinguish the prepubertal from pubertal status.
Methods
Auxologycal characteristics were recorded and serum LH and FSH were measured by immunochemiluminescence assays before and after GnRH stimulation test in a sample of 241 Caucasian girls with breast budding between 6- and 8-years old. Peak LH levels higher than 5 IU/L were considered a pubertal response. Area under the curve, cut-off points, sensitivity, and specificity for auxologycal variables and basal gonadotropins levels were determined by receiver operating curves.
Results
There were no significant differences in age at onset, weight, height, BMI and height velocity between both groups. Bone age was significantly higher in pubertal girls (P < 0.05), although with limited discriminatory capacity. The sensitivity and specificity for the basal LH levels were 89 and 82%, respectively, for a cut off point of 0.1 IU/L. All girls in the pubertal group had a basal LH higher than 1.0 IU/L (positive predictive value of 100%). There was a wide overlap of basal FSH and LH/FSH ratio between prepubertal and pubertal girls.
Conclusions
Auxologycal characteristics should not be used only in the differential diagnosis between prepubertal from pubertal status in 6- to 8-year-old girls. We found a high specificity of a single basal LH sample and it would be useful for establishing the diagnosis of puberty in this age group, reducing the need for GnRH stimulation testing.
Search for other papers by María Dolores Rodríguez Arnao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amparo Rodríguez Sánchez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ignacio Díez López in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joaquín Ramírez Fernández in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jose Antonio Bermúdez de la Vega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Diego Yeste Fernández in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María Chueca Guindulain in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raquel Corripio Collado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jacobo Pérez Sánchez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana Fernández González in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by ECOS Spain Study Collaborative Investigator Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Non-adherence to r-hGH treatments occurs in a variable percentage of subjects. One problem found when evaluating adherence is the great variability in methods of detection and definitions utilized in studies. This study assessed the level of adherence in subjects receiving r-hGH with the easypod™ electronic device.
Methods
National, multicenter, prospective and observational study involving 238 subjects (144 with GH deficiency (GHD), and 86 with small for gestational age (SGA), 8 with Turner Syndrome), who received r-hGH with easypod™ for at least 3 months before inclusion. The follow-up period was 4 years.
Results
Overall adherence was 94.5%; 97.5% after 6 months, 95.3% after 1 year, 93.7% after 2, 94.4% after 3 and 95.5% after 4 years of treatment. No differences in adherence were observed between prepubertal and pubertal groups and GHD and SGA groups. Change in height after 1 and 2 years, change in height SDS after 1 and 2 years, HV after 1 year, HV SDS after at 1 and 4 years, change in BMI after 1 year and change in BMI SDS at 1 and 2 years showed significant correlation with adherence. No significant differences in adherence according to IGF-I levels were found in follow-up visits or between groups.
Conclusions
The easypod™ electronic device, apart from being a precise and objective measure of adherence to r-hGH treatment, allows high compliance rates to be achieved over long periods of time. Adherence significantly impacts growth outcomes associated with r-hGH treatment.
