Search Results
Search for other papers by Régis Coutant in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Pediatric team of the Clinical Investigation Center 9302/INSERM, Hospital of Children, Toulouse, France
Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051 - Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
Search for other papers by Maithé Tauber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Béatrice Demaret in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robin Henocque in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yves Brault in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by François Montestruc in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Patient-Reported Outcomes Unit (PROQOL), UMR 1123, University Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Olivier Chassany in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel Polak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by the QOLITHOR Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The objective of this study was to describe in a real-life setting the treatment burden and adherence and quality of life (QOL) of children treated with daily injections of growth hormone and their relationship with treatment duration.
Design
This non-interventional, multicenter, cross-sectional French study involved children aged 3–17 years treated with daily growth hormone injections.
Methods
Based on a recent validated dyad questionnaire, the mean overall life interference total score (100 = most interference) was described, with treatment adherence and QOL, using the Quality of Life of Short Stature Youth questionnaire (100 = best). All analyses were performed according to treatment duration prior to inclusion.
Results
Among the 275/277 analyzed children, 166 (60.4%) had only growth hormone deficiency (GHD). In the GHD group, the mean age was 11.7 ± 3.2 years; median treatment duration was 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.8–6.4). The mean overall life interference total score was 27.7 ± 20.7 (95% CI (24.2; 31.2)), with non-significant correlation with treatment duration (P = 0.1925). Treatment adherence was good (95.0% of children reported receiving >80% of planned injections over the last month); it slightly decreased with treatment duration (P = 0.0364). Children’s overall QOL was good (81.5 ± 16.6 and 77.6 ± 18.7 according to children and parents, respectively), but subscores of the coping and treatment impact domains were <50. Similar results were observed in all patients independently of the condition requiring treatment.
Conclusions
This real-life French cohort confirms the treatment burden of daily growth hormone injections, as previously reported in an interventional study.
Search for other papers by Christine Poitou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anthony Holland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlotte Höybye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura C G de Graaff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sandrine Bottius in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Berit Otterlei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maithé Tauber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS), the most common form of syndromic obesity, is a complex neurodevelopmental genetic disorder including obesity with hyperphagia, endocrine and metabolic disorders and also psychiatric disorders. The most frequent endocrine disturbances include hypogonadism and growth hormone (GH) deficiency. Hypothyroidism and central adrenal insufficiency can also be observed but are less frequent. The transition of individuals with PWS from adolescence to adult life is challenging because of multiple comorbidities and complex disabilities. Individuals and caregivers face psychological, medical and social issues. This period of profound changes is thus prone to disruptions, and the main risks being the worsening of the medical situation and loss to follow-up of the individuals. Medical care may be poorly adapted to the needs of individuals because of a lack of knowledge concerning the syndrome and also lack of the necessary specific skills. A multidisciplinary panel composed of several experts in PWS met in November 2021 during an European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN) webinar. They presented complementary aspects of PWS from the perspective of the transition including psychiatric, pediatric and adult endocrinological and parent’s and patient’s points of view and shed light on the best way to approach this pivotal period.
Search for other papers by Anita Hokken-Koelega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aart-Jan van der Lely in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Berthold Hauffa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gabriele Häusler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gudmundur Johannsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mohamad Maghnie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jesús Argente in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean DeSchepper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helena Gleeson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John W Gregory in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlotte Höybye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fahrettin Keleştimur in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anton Luger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hermann L Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sebastian Neggers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vera Popovic-Brkic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eleonora Porcu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lars Sävendahl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen Shalet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bessie Spiliotis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maithé Tauber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Seamless transition of endocrine patients from the paediatric to adult setting is still suboptimal, especially in patients with complex disorders, i.e., small for gestational age, Turner or Prader–Willi syndromes; Childhood Cancer Survivors, and those with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency.
Methods
An expert panel meeting comprised of European paediatric and adult endocrinologists was convened to explore the current gaps in managing the healthcare of patients with endocrine diseases during transition from paediatric to adult care settings.
Results
While a consensus was reached that a team approach is best, discussions revealed that a ‘one size fits all’ model for transition is largely unsuccessful in these patients. They need more tailored care during adolescence to prevent complications like failure to achieve target adult height, reduced bone mineral density, morbid obesity, metabolic perturbations (obesity and body composition), inappropriate/inadequate puberty, compromised fertility, diminished quality of life and failure to adapt to the demands of adult life. Sometimes it is difficult for young people to detach emotionally from their paediatric endocrinologist and/or the abrupt change from an environment of parental responsibility to one of autonomy. Discussions about impending transition and healthcare autonomy should begin in early adolescence and continue throughout young adulthood to ensure seamless continuum of care and optimal treatment outcomes.
Conclusions
Even amongst a group of healthcare professionals with a great interest in improving transition services for patients with endocrine diseases, there is still much work to be done to improve the quality of healthcare for transition patients.
