Search Results
Search for other papers by K G Samsom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L M van Veenendaal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G D Valk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M R Vriens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M E T Tesselaar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J G van den Berg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumours. In recent years, basic research in SI-NETs has attempted to unravel the molecular events underlying SI-NET tumorigenesis.
Aim
We aim to provide an overview of the current literature regarding prognostic and predictive molecular factors in patients with SI-NETs.
Method
A PubMed search was conducted on (epi)genetic prognostic factors in SI-NETs from 2000 until 2019.
Results
The search yielded 1522 articles of which 20 reviews and 35 original studies were selected for further evaluation. SI-NETs are mutationally quiet tumours with a different genetic make-up compared to pancreatic NETs. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18 is the most frequent genomic aberration (44–100%) followed by mutations of CDKN1B in 8%. Prognostic analyses were performed in 16 studies, of which 8 found a significant (epi)genetic association for survival or progression. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18, gains of chromosome 4, 5, 7, 14 and 20p, copy gain of the SRC gene and low expression of RASSF1A and P16 were associated with poorer survival. In comparison with genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations are significantly more common in SI-NETs and may represent more promising targets in the treatment of SI-NETs.
Conclusion
SI-NETs are mutationally silent tumours. No biomarkers have been identified yet that can easily be adopted into current clinical decision making. SI-NETs may represent a heterogeneous disease and larger international studies are warranted to translate molecular findings into precision oncology.
Search for other papers by Elizabeth J de Koster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
Search for other papers by Olga Husson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eveline W C M van Dam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Sophie Mijnhout in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Romana T Netea-Maier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Wim J G Oyen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marieke Snel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dennis Vriens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by for the EfFECTS trial study group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
This study assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients undergoing 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT for an indeterminate (Bethesda III/IV) thyroid nodule. FDG-PET/CT accurately rules out malignancy and prevents 40% of futile diagnostic surgeries in these nodules.
Design
Secondary analyses of HRQoL data from a randomised controlled multicentre trial (NCT02208544) in 126 patients from 15 hospitals in the Netherlands were done.
Methods
Longitudinal HRQoL assessment was performed using the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L), the RAND 36-item Health Survey v2.0 (RAND-36), and the Thyroid Patient-Reported Outcome (ThyPRO) questionnaire on baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, relative to the date of the FDG-PET/CT scan.
Results
Patients who were randomised to active surveillance following an FDG-negative nodule instead of diagnostic surgery reported stable HRQoL scores throughout the year. Univariate analysis indicated better HRQoL for patients undergoing surveillance than surgical patients with benign histopathology on multiple physical and psychosocial domains. Univariate within-group analysis suggested both temporary and continued HRQoL deteriorations in patients with benign histopathology over time. Multivariate within-group analysis demonstrated no significant longitudinal HRQoL changes in patients undergoing active surveillance. In contrast, in patients with benign histopathology, worse HRQoL was observed with regard to ThyPRO cognitive impairment (P = 0.01) and cosmetic complaints (P = 0.02), whereas goitre symptoms (P < 0.001) and anxiety (P = 0.04) improved over time. In patients with malignant histopathology, anxiety also decreased (P = 0.05).
Conclusions
The reassurance of a negative FDG-PET/CT resulted in sustained HRQoL throughout the first year of active surveillance. Diagnostic surgery for a nodule with benign histopathology resulted in more cognitive impairment and physical problems including cosmetic complaints, but improved goitre symptoms and anxiety. Anxiety was also reduced in patients with malignant histopathology.
Search for other papers by Dirk-Jan van Beek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel S van Leeuwaarde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carolina R C Pieterman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Menno R Vriens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Parelsnoer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Gerlof D Valk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by the DutchMEN Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rare diseases pose specific challenges in the field of medical research to provide physicians with evidence-based guidelines derived from studies with sufficient quality. An example of these rare diseases is multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), which is an autosomal dominant endocrine tumor syndrome with an estimated occurrence rate of 2–3 per 100,000. For this complex disease, characterized by multiple endocrine tumors, it proves difficult to perform both adequate and feasible studies. The opinion of patients themselves is of utmost importance to identify the gaps in the evidence-based medicine regarding clinical care. In the search for scientific answers to clinical research questions, the aim for best available evidence is obvious. Observational studies within patient cohorts, although prone to bias, seem the most feasible study design regarding the disease prevalence. Knowledge and adaptation to all types of bias is demanded in the strive for answers. Guided by our research on MEN1 patients, we elaborate on strategies to identify sufficient patients, to maximize and maintain patient enrolment and to standardize the data collection process. Preferably, data collection is performed prospectively, however, under certain conditions, data storage in a longitudinal retrospective database with a disease-specific framework is suitable. Considering the global challenges on observational research on rare diseases, we propose a stepwise approach from clinical research questions to scientific answers.
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital/ University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by S C Clement in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by W E Visser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by C A Lebbink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Albano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H L Claahsen-van der Grinten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Czarniecka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by R P Dias in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M P Dierselhuis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I Dzivite-Krisane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Elisei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Garcia-Burillo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Izatt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Kanaka-Gantenbein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Krude in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Lamartina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Lorenz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Luster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Navardauskaitė in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Negre Busó in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Newbold in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R P Peeters in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Pellegriti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Piccardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A L Priego in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Redlich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L de Sanctis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Sobrinho-Simões in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A S P van Trotsenburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F A Verburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Vriens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T P Links in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Office for Rare Conditions, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Search for other papers by S F Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by H M van Santen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Although differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is the most frequent endocrine pediatric cancer, it is rare in childhood and adolescence. While tumor persistence and recurrence are not uncommon, mortality remains extremely low. Complications of treatment are however reported in up to 48% of the survivors. Due to the rarity of the disease, current treatment guidelines are predominantly based on the results of small observational retrospective studies and extrapolations from results in adult patients. In order to develop more personalized treatment and follow-up strategies (aiming to reduce complication rates), there is an unmet need for uniform international prospective data collection and clinical trials.
Methods and analysis
The European pediatric thyroid carcinoma registry aims to collect clinical data for all patients ≤18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of DTC who have been diagnosed, assessed, or treated at a participating site. This registry will be a component of the wider European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions project which has close links to Endo-ERN, the European Reference Network for Rare Endocrine Conditions. A multidisciplinary expert working group was formed to develop a minimal dataset comprising information regarding demographic data, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. We constructed an umbrella-type registry, with a detailed basic dataset. In the future, this may provide the opportunity for research teams to integrate clinical research questions.
Ethics and dissemination
Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and/or their parents/guardians. Summaries and descriptive analyses of the registry will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
