Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for

  • Author: Karim Meeran x
Clear All Modify Search
Sirazum Choudhury Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Commonwealth Building, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sirazum Choudhury in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tricia Tan Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Commonwealth Building, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Tricia Tan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Katharine Lazarus Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Commonwealth Building, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Katharine Lazarus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Karim Meeran Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Commonwealth Building, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The introduction of adrenocortical extract in 1930 improved the life expectancy of hyhpoadrenal patients, with further increases seen after the introduction of cortisone acetate from 1948. Most patients are now treated with synthetic hydrocortisone, and incremental advances have been made with optimisation of daily dosing and the introduction of multidose regimens. There remains a significant mortality gap between individuals with treated hypoadrenalism and the general population. It is unclear whether this gap is a result of glucocorticoid over-replacement, under-replacement or loss of the circadian and ultradian rhythm of cortisol secretion, with the risk of detrimental excess glucocorticoid exposure at later times in the day. The way forwards will involve replacement of the diurnal cortisol rhythm with better glucocorticoid replacement regimens. The steroid profile produced by both prednisolone and dual-release hydrocortisone (Plenadren), provide a smoother glucocorticoid profile of cortisol than standard oral multidose regimens of hydrocortisone and cortisone acetate. The individualisation of prednisolone doses and lower bioavailability of Plenadren offer reductions in total steroid exposure. Although there is emerging evidence of both treatments offering better cardiometabolic outcomes than standard glucocorticoid replacement regimens, there is a paucity of evidence involving very low dose prednisolone (2–4 mg daily) compared to the larger doses (~7.5 mg) historically used. Data from upcoming clinical studies on prednisolone will therefore be of key importance in informing future practice.

Open access
David J F Smith Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by David J F Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hemanth Prabhudev Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Hemanth Prabhudev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sirazum Choudhury Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Investigative Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sirazum Choudhury in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Karim Meeran Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Investigative Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Introduction

Patients who need glucocorticoid replacement in both primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency (AI) have the choice of either once-daily prednisolone or thrice-daily hydrocortisone. A recent European study found no difference between prednisolone and hydrocortisone users in several markers including glucose, weight, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and waist circumference, although an increase in cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was suggested in a subgroup of these patients. The aim of this study was to expand the evidence base for the use of these agents as replacement therapy.

Methods

Data from 82 patients on hydrocortisone and 64 patients on prednisolone for AI at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust were analysed.

Results

There was no significant difference in total cholesterol, LDL levels or any other risk factors between hydrocortisone and prednisolone patients. Prednisolone was subjectively significantly more convenient than hydrocortisone (P = 0.048).

Conclusions

Prednisolone once daily is more convenient than hydrocortisone thrice daily, and there is no difference in the markers of cardiovascular risk measured. Because prednisolone mimics the circadian rhythm better than other glucocorticoids, it should be considered as an alternative to hydrocortisone for AI.

Open access
Angelica Sharma Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Angelica Sharma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Katharine Lazarus Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Katharine Lazarus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Deborah Papadopoulou Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Deborah Papadopoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hemanth Prabhudev Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Hemanth Prabhudev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tricia Tan Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, North West London Pathology, London, UK

Search for other papers by Tricia Tan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karim Meeran Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sirazum Choudhury Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, North West London Pathology, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sirazum Choudhury in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Context

Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) have a higher mortality than the general population, possibly because of excess glucocorticoid exposure at inappropriate times. The cortisol circadian rhythm is difficult to mimic with twice- or thrice-daily hydrocortisone. Prednisolone is a once-daily alternative which may improve patient compliance through its convenience.

Objectives

Prednisolone day curves can be used to accurately downtitrate patients to the minimum effective dose. This study aimed to review prednisolone day curves and determine therapeutic ranges at different time points after administration.

Methods

Between August 2013 and May 2021, 108 prednisolone day curves from 76 individuals receiving prednisolone replacement were analysed. Prednisolone concentrations were determined by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between 2-, 4-, and 6-h prednisolone levels compared to the previously validated standard 8-h prednisolone level (15–25 μg/L).

Results

The median dose was 4 mg of prednisolone once daily. There was a strong correlation between the 4- and 8-h (R = 0.8829, P ≤ 0.0001) and 6- and 8-h prednisolone levels (R = 0.9530, P ≤ 0.0001). Target ranges for prednisolone were 37–62 μg/L at 4 h, 24–39 μg/L at 6 h, and 15–25 μg/L at 8 h. Prednisolone doses were successfully reduced in 21 individuals, and of these, 3 were reduced to 2 mg once daily. All patients were well upon follow-up.

Conclusion

This is the largest evaluation of oral prednisolone pharmacokinetics in humans. Low-dose prednisolone of 2–4 mg is safe and effective in most patients with AI. Doses can be titrated with either 4-, 6-, or 8-h single time point drug levels.

Open access
Ramjan Sanas Mohamed Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Ramjan Sanas Mohamed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Biyaser Abuelgasim Imperial College School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Biyaser Abuelgasim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sally Barker Imperial College School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sally Barker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hemanth Prabhudev Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Hemanth Prabhudev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Niamh M Martin Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Niamh M Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karim Meeran Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Emma L Williams Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Emma L Williams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sarah Darch Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sarah Darch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Whitlock Matthew Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Whitlock Matthew in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tricia Tan Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Tricia Tan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Florian Wernig Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Florian Wernig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) poses considerable diagnostic challenges. Although late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) is recommended as a first-line screening investigation, it remains the least widely used test in many countries. The combined measurement of LNSC and late-night salivary cortisone (LNS cortisone) has shown to further improve diagnostic accuracy. We present a retrospective study in a tertiary referral centre comparing LNSC, LNS cortisone, overnight dexamethasone suppression test, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test and 24-h urinary free cortisol results of patients investigated for CS. Patients were categorised into those who had CS (21 patients) and those who did not (33 patients). LNSC had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 91%. LNS cortisone had a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 86%. With an optimal cut-off for LNS cortisone of >14.5 nmol/L the sensitivity was 95.2%, and the specificity was 100% with an area under the curve of 0.997, for diagnosing CS. Saliva collection is non-invasive and can be carried out at home. We therefore advocate simultaneous measurement of LNSC and LNS cortisone as the first-line screening test to evaluate patients with suspected CS.

Open access
Ali Abbara Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Ali Abbara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sophie Clarke Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sophie Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pei Chia Eng Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Pei Chia Eng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James Milburn Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by James Milburn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Devavrata Joshi Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Devavrata Joshi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alexander N Comninos Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Alexander N Comninos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rozana Ramli Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Rozana Ramli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amrish Mehta Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Amrish Mehta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brynmor Jones Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Brynmor Jones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Florian Wernig Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Florian Wernig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ramesh Nair Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Ramesh Nair in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nigel Mendoza Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Nigel Mendoza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amir H Sam Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Amir H Sam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Emma Hatfield Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Emma Hatfield in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karim Meeran Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Waljit S Dhillo Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Waljit S Dhillo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Niamh M Martin Department of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Niamh M Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

To review the clinical and biochemical characteristics and clinical outcome of patients presenting with pituitary apoplexy to a tertiary centre.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features, predisposing factors, biochemistry and clinical outcome of patients presenting with pituitary apoplexy to Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust between 1991 and 2015.

Results

We identified 64 patients with pituitary apoplexy (more complete clinical records were available in 52 patients). The median age at presentation was 46.7 years (IQR 31.5–57.0 years). Pituitary apoplexy was the first presentation of pituitary disease in 38/52 of patients and predisposing factors were identified in 28/52. Pituitary apoplexy predominantly occurred in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas (47/52). Headache was most commonly described as sudden onset, severe, lateralising to the frontal or temporal regions. Symptoms of meningeal irritation were reported in 7/18 and visual abnormalities in 22/35. A pre-treatment serum cortisol <100 nmol/L was recorded in 12/31 of patients. All patients with visual disturbance had some resolution of their visual symptoms whether managed surgically (14/14) or conservatively (5/5), although pituitary endocrine function did not fully recover in any patient.

Conclusions

In conclusion, these data describe the clinical features of pituitary apoplexy to aid the clinician in diagnosing this rare emergency presentation of pituitary disease. Prospective multicentre studies of the presentation of pituitary apoplexy are required to further characterise presentation and outcomes.

Open access