Search Results
Search for other papers by Jennifer K Y Ko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jinghua Shi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raymond H W Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by William S B Yeung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ernest H Y Ng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Vitamin D receptors are present in the female reproductive tract. Studies on the association between serum vitamin D level and pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF) showed inconsistent results and focused on a single fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycle. The objective of our study was to evaluate if serum vitamin D level before ovarian stimulation was associated with the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of the first IVF cycle.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Methods
Women who underwent the first IVF cycle from 2012 to 2016 at a university-affiliated reproductive medicine center were included. Archived serum samples taken before ovarian stimulation were analyzed for 25(OH)D levels using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Results
In total, 1113 had pregnancy outcome from the completed IVF cycle. The median age (25th–75th percentile) of the women was 36 (34–38) years and serum 25(OH)D level was 53.4 (41.9–66.6) nmol/L. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (less than 50 nmol/L) was 42.2%. The CLBR in the vitamin D-deficient group was significantly lower compared to the non-deficient group (43.9%, 208/474 vs 50.9%, 325/639, P = 0.021, unadjusted), and after controlling for women’s age, BMI, antral follicle count, type and duration of infertility. There were no differences in the clinical/ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate and miscarriage rate in the fresh cycle between the vitamin D deficient and non-deficient groups.
Conclusions
Vitamin D deficiency was prevalent in infertile women in subtropical Hong Kong. The CLBR of the first IVF cycle in the vitamin D-deficient group was significantly lower compared to the non-deficient group.
Search for other papers by Jennifer K Y Ko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas F J King in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Louise Williams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah M Creighton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gerard S Conway in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
To review the treatment choices of women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) at a single tertiary centre.
Design
Retrospective review.
Patients
Women with CAIS identified from our database.
Results
The study group comprised 141 women with CAIS. Eleven percent (16/141) of women had gonads in situ, 3 of whom were under workup for gonadectomy. The age of gonadectomy in the remainder 125 women was 17 (0.1–53) years. The most common form of HRT was oral oestrogen or transdermal oestrogen in 80% (113/141). 13/141 (9%) women used vaginal oestrogens alone or together with other forms of HRT. Testosterone preparations had been used by 17% (24/141) of women and were currently used in 10% (14/141). Of those who had used testosterone, 42% (10/24) had chosen not to continue after a therapeutic trial.
Conclusions
In a clinic offering individualised multidisciplinary care for women with CAIS, we found that the majority of women chose oestrogen-based treatment while a significant minority used testosterone.
