Search Results
Search for other papers by David J F Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hemanth Prabhudev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Investigative Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Sirazum Choudhury in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Investigative Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction
Patients who need glucocorticoid replacement in both primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency (AI) have the choice of either once-daily prednisolone or thrice-daily hydrocortisone. A recent European study found no difference between prednisolone and hydrocortisone users in several markers including glucose, weight, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and waist circumference, although an increase in cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was suggested in a subgroup of these patients. The aim of this study was to expand the evidence base for the use of these agents as replacement therapy.
Methods
Data from 82 patients on hydrocortisone and 64 patients on prednisolone for AI at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust were analysed.
Results
There was no significant difference in total cholesterol, LDL levels or any other risk factors between hydrocortisone and prednisolone patients. Prednisolone was subjectively significantly more convenient than hydrocortisone (P = 0.048).
Conclusions
Prednisolone once daily is more convenient than hydrocortisone thrice daily, and there is no difference in the markers of cardiovascular risk measured. Because prednisolone mimics the circadian rhythm better than other glucocorticoids, it should be considered as an alternative to hydrocortisone for AI.
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Search for other papers by Angelica Sharma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Search for other papers by Katharine Lazarus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Search for other papers by Deborah Papadopoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hemanth Prabhudev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, North West London Pathology, London, UK
Search for other papers by Tricia Tan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, North West London Pathology, London, UK
Search for other papers by Sirazum Choudhury in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Context
Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) have a higher mortality than the general population, possibly because of excess glucocorticoid exposure at inappropriate times. The cortisol circadian rhythm is difficult to mimic with twice- or thrice-daily hydrocortisone. Prednisolone is a once-daily alternative which may improve patient compliance through its convenience.
Objectives
Prednisolone day curves can be used to accurately downtitrate patients to the minimum effective dose. This study aimed to review prednisolone day curves and determine therapeutic ranges at different time points after administration.
Methods
Between August 2013 and May 2021, 108 prednisolone day curves from 76 individuals receiving prednisolone replacement were analysed. Prednisolone concentrations were determined by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between 2-, 4-, and 6-h prednisolone levels compared to the previously validated standard 8-h prednisolone level (15–25 μg/L).
Results
The median dose was 4 mg of prednisolone once daily. There was a strong correlation between the 4- and 8-h (R = 0.8829, P ≤ 0.0001) and 6- and 8-h prednisolone levels (R = 0.9530, P ≤ 0.0001). Target ranges for prednisolone were 37–62 μg/L at 4 h, 24–39 μg/L at 6 h, and 15–25 μg/L at 8 h. Prednisolone doses were successfully reduced in 21 individuals, and of these, 3 were reduced to 2 mg once daily. All patients were well upon follow-up.
Conclusion
This is the largest evaluation of oral prednisolone pharmacokinetics in humans. Low-dose prednisolone of 2–4 mg is safe and effective in most patients with AI. Doses can be titrated with either 4-, 6-, or 8-h single time point drug levels.
Search for other papers by Ramjan Sanas Mohamed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Biyaser Abuelgasim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sally Barker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hemanth Prabhudev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Niamh M Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emma L Williams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Darch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Whitlock Matthew in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Tricia Tan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florian Wernig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) poses considerable diagnostic challenges. Although late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) is recommended as a first-line screening investigation, it remains the least widely used test in many countries. The combined measurement of LNSC and late-night salivary cortisone (LNS cortisone) has shown to further improve diagnostic accuracy. We present a retrospective study in a tertiary referral centre comparing LNSC, LNS cortisone, overnight dexamethasone suppression test, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test and 24-h urinary free cortisol results of patients investigated for CS. Patients were categorised into those who had CS (21 patients) and those who did not (33 patients). LNSC had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 91%. LNS cortisone had a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 86%. With an optimal cut-off for LNS cortisone of >14.5 nmol/L the sensitivity was 95.2%, and the specificity was 100% with an area under the curve of 0.997, for diagnosing CS. Saliva collection is non-invasive and can be carried out at home. We therefore advocate simultaneous measurement of LNSC and LNS cortisone as the first-line screening test to evaluate patients with suspected CS.
