Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Feifei Cheng x
Clear All Modify Search
Yao Su Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Yao Su in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Li Chen Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Li Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dong-Yao Zhang Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Dong-Yao Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Xu-Pei Gan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Xu-Pei Gan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yan-Nan Cao Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Yan-Nan Cao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
De-Cui Cheng Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by De-Cui Cheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wen-Yu Liu Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Wen-Yu Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Fei-Fei Li Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Fei-Fei Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Xian-Ming Xu Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Xian-Ming Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Hong-Kun Wang Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Hong-Kun Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Objective

To investigate the characteristics of intestinal flora in overweight pregnant women and the correlation with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

A total of 122 women were enrolled and divided into four groups according to their pre-pregnancy BMI and the presence of GDM: group 1 (n = 71) with a BMI <24 kg/m2, without GDM; group 2 (n = 27) with a BMI <24 kg/m2, with GDM; group 3 (n = 17) with a BMI ≥24 kg/m2, without GDM; and group 4 (n = 7) with a BMI ≥24 kg/m2 with GDM. Feces were collected on the day that the oral glucose tolerance test was conducted. The V3–V4 variable region of 16S rRNA was sequenced using the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform, and a bioinformatics analysis was conducted.

Results

There were differences between the four groups in the composition of intestinal flora, and it was significantly different in group 4 than in the other three groups. Firmicutes accounted for 36.4% of the intestinal flora in this group, the lowest among the four groups, while Bacteroidetes accounted for 50.1%, the highest among the four groups, making ratio of these two bacteria approximately 3:5, while in the other three groups, this ratio was reversed. In women with a BMI <24 kg/m2, the insulin resistance index (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) in pregnant women with GDM was higher than in those without (P 3 = 0.026).

Conclusion

The composition of the intestinal flora of pregnant women who were overweight or obese before pregnancy and suffered from GDM was significantly different than women who were not overweight or did not suffer from GDM.

Open access
Feifei Cheng Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Feifei Cheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Noel Yat Hey Ng Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Noel Yat Hey Ng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Claudia Ha Ting Tam Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Claudia Ha Ting Tam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yuying Zhang Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Yuying Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Cadmon King Poo Lim Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Cadmon King Poo Lim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Guozhi Jiang Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Guozhi Jiang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alex Chi Wai Ng Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Alex Chi Wai Ng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tiffany Tse Ling Yau Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Tiffany Tse Ling Yau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lai Ping Cheung Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Lai Ping Cheung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Aimin Xu Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Aimin Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Juliana C N Chan Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Chinese University of Hong Kong-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Research Centre in Diabetes Genomics and Precision Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Juliana C N Chan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ronald C W Ma Department of Medicine and Therapeutics The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute of Diabetes and Obesity, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Chinese University of Hong Kong-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Research Centre in Diabetes Genomics and Precision Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for other papers by Ronald C W Ma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. FGF19, FGF21 and lipocalin-2 have emerged as important markers of metabolic risk. This study aims to compare the levels of FGF19, FGF21 and lipocalin-2 between subjects with or without PCOS, and to investigate the relationship between proteins and diabetes progression. In this nested case–control cohort study, 128 Chinese PCOS women and 128 controls were recruited and followed-up. All subjects underwent the oral glucose tolerance test for the evaluation of glycaemic status. Baseline serum protein levels were measured using ELISA. Compared with controls, PCOS subjects had higher levels of FGF19 (P < 0.001) and FGF21 (P = 0.022), but had lower lipocalin-2 (P < 0.001). In total, 20.8% of PCOS and 9.2% of controls developed diabetes over a mean duration of 10.4 ± 1.2 and 11.3 ± 0.5 years, respectively. Logistic regression analyses suggested FGF19 was positively associated with diabetes progression in controls, after adjusting for age, follow-up duration, waist and fasting glucose (P = 0.026, odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 7.4 (1.3–43.6)), and the positive relationship between FGF21 and diabetes progression in controls was attenuated by adjusting for age and follow-up duration (P = 0.183). Lipocalin-2 was positively correlated with diabetes progression in PCOS group (P = 0.026, OR (95% CI)): 2.5 (1.1–5.6)); however, this became attenuated after adjusting for waist and fasting glucose (P = 0.081). In conclusion, there is differential expression of FGF19, FGF21, and lipocalin-2 in PCOS. The serum level of FGF19, and FGF21 is associated with diabetes progression in women without PCOS, while lipocalin-2 was related to diabetes progression in PCOS women.

Open access