Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items for

  • Author: Camilla Schalin-Jäntti x
Clear All Modify Search
Anna-Pauliina Iivonen Institute of Biomedicine/Physiology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Anna-Pauliina Iivonen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Johanna Känsäkoski Institute of Biomedicine/Physiology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Johanna Känsäkoski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Atte Karppinen Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Atte Karppinen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Leena Kivipelto Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Leena Kivipelto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Camilla Schalin-Jäntti Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Auli Karhu Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, RPU, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Auli Karhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Taneli Raivio Institute of Biomedicine/Physiology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Taneli Raivio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Objective

Recently, mutations in KCNQ1, a potassium channel gene usually linked to long QT syndrome, were reported to cause maternally inherited gingival fibromatosis and growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Expression of the mutated KCNQ1 with the auxiliary potassium channel subunit KCNE2 was shown to reduce pituitary hormone secretion in functional experiments. Here, we investigated if germline mutations in KCNQ1 and KCNE2 were present in patients with somatotropinomas, which represent a model of growth hormone excess.

Design and methods

KCNQ1 and KCNE2 were screened for germline mutations in 53 patients with acromegaly by Sanger sequencing. Effects of the variants were predicted by in silico tools.

Results

Only deep intronic and synonymous polymorphisms were detected in KCNQ1. These findings were likely insignificant based on in silico predictions and the variants’ frequencies in the general population. In KCNE2, a heterozygous c.22A>G, p.(Thr8Ala) mutation with unknown significance was found in three patients. It was present in the database controls with a frequency of 0.0038.

Conclusions

KCNQ1 or KCNE2 mutations do not appear to account for somatotropinoma formation, although larger patient series are needed to validate the findings.

Open access
Eeva M Ryhänen
Search for other papers by Eeva M Ryhänen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ilkka Heiskanen
Search for other papers by Ilkka Heiskanen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Harri Sintonen Endocrinology, Department of Public Health, Group Administration, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Post Box 340, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Harri Sintonen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matti J Välimäki
Search for other papers by Matti J Välimäki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Risto P Roine Endocrinology, Department of Public Health, Group Administration, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Post Box 340, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland
Endocrinology, Department of Public Health, Group Administration, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Post Box 340, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland
Endocrinology, Department of Public Health, Group Administration, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Post Box 340, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Risto P Roine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Camilla Schalin-Jäntti
Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is frequently impaired in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) but it is unclear if surgery is beneficial. The objective was to prospectively assess HRQoL in PHPT (n=124) with the 15D instrument before and after surgery, to compare it with that of a comparable sample of the general population (n=4295), and search for predictors of HRQoL and its change. HRQoL, and clinical and laboratory parameters were measured before and at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Regression techniques were used to search for predictors of HRQoL and gains from treatment. Before surgery, PHPT patients had significantly lower mean 15D score compared to controls (0.813 vs 0.904, P<0.001). Excretion, mental function, discomfort and symptoms, distress, depression, vitality, and sexual activity were most impaired (all P<0.001). Number of medications (P=0.001) and subjective symptoms (P<0.05) but not calcium or parathyroid hormone (PTH) predicted impaired HRQoL. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) was of borderline significance (P=0.051). Compared to baseline, mean 15D score improved significantly 6 months after surgery (0.813 vs 0.865, P<0.001) and the effect sustained at 1 year (0.878, P<0.001). The improvement was clinically important in 77.4% of patients (P<0.001). Educational level independently predicted improvement (P<0.005). HRQoL is severely impaired in PHPT but improves significantly after surgery. The 15D is a sensitive tool for assessing HRQoL and recognizing patients likely to benefit from surgery.

Open access
Violeta Iotova Endo-ERN Work Package ‘Education & Training’ Paediatric Chair, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria

Search for other papers by Violeta Iotova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Camilla Schalin-Jäntti Endo-ERN Work Package ‘Education & Training’ Adult Chair, Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Petra Bruegmann Endo-ERN Work Package ‘Education & Training’ European Patient Advocacy Group (ePAG) representative co-chair, Endo-ERN, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Petra Bruegmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Manuela Broesamle Endo-ERN Work Package ‘Education & Training’ European Patient Advocacy Group (ePAG) representative co-chair, Endo-ERN, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Manuela Broesamle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Natasa Bratina Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, University Medical Center, University Childrens Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Natasa Bratina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Vallo Tillmann Children’s Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia

Search for other papers by Vallo Tillmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olaf Hiort Endo-ERN, Division of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alberto M Pereira Endo-ERN, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Alberto M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Objective

The European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN), operational since 2017, consists of 71 health care providers (HCPs) in 19 EU member states. Our objective was to assess education and knowledge on rare endocrine conditions.

Design and methods

A survey was developed and sent through the DIGIT-EUROSURVEY system to all Endo-ERN HCPs.

Results

Response rate was 55% (n = 146), 95% physicians, 58% >20 years of experience, 96% academics. Largest knowledge gaps were reported for the transition and neonatal ages, and for the GPs. Less than 50% of HCPs had structured educational rare diseases (RD) plans, while 86% used RD specific guidelines. HCPs would share educational materials within Endo-ERN (74%), and participate in an accreditation model (85%). E-learning portals of the endocrine scientific societies used 58% (ESPE) and 64% (ESE). Most participants (90%) regarded Endo-ERN coordinated educational activities (annual meetings slots, webinars, etc.) as highly important and supported a common educational platform. Social media was perceived as important for educating patients (86%) but not for physicians (36%). Seventy-five % had developed patient education materials; only 31% had specific children’s materials, and by-country availability varied from 0 to 100%. Respondents provided newly diagnosed patients with their own material in the national language (81%); referred to advocacy groups (68%), and relevant online sources (50%). Respondents believed the European Commission should fund education through Endo-ERN.

Conclusion

Identified knowledge gaps in rare endocrine disorders set the basis for fast catch-up through collaboration, alignment with patients’ needs, and further development of existing and newly developed educational resources.

Open access
Sara Storvall Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Sara Storvall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Helena Leijon Department of Pathology and Huslab, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Helena Leijon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eeva Ryhänen Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Eeva Ryhänen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Johanna Louhimo Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Johanna Louhimo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Caj Haglund Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Caj Haglund in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Camilla Schalin-Jäntti Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Johanna Arola Department of Pathology and Huslab, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Johanna Arola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Introduction

Parathyroid carcinoma represents a rare cause of primary hyperparathyroidism. Distinguishing carcinoma from the benign tumors underlying primary hyperparathyroidism remains challenging. The diagnostic criteria for parathyroid carcinoma are local and/or metastatic spreading. Atypical parathyroid adenomas share other histological features with carcinomas but lack invasive growth. Somatostatin receptors are commonly expressed in different neuroendocrine tumors, but whether this also holds for parathyroid tumors remains unknown.

Aim

Our aim is to examine the immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor 1–5 in parathyroid typical adenomas, atypical adenomas and carcinomas.

Methods

We used a tissue microarray construct from a nationwide cohort of parathyroid carcinomas (n = 32), age- and gender-matched typical parathyroid adenomas (n = 72) and atypical parathyroid adenomas (n = 27) for immunohistochemistry of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1–5. We separately assessed cytoplasmic, membrane and nuclear expression and also investigated the associations with histological, biochemical and clinical characteristics.

Results

All parathyroid tumor subgroups expressed somatostatin receptors, although membrane expression appeared negligible. Except for somatostatin receptor 1, expression patterns differed between the three tumor types. Adenomas exhibited the weakest and carcinomas the strongest expression of somatostatin receptor 2, 3, 4 and 5. We observed the largest difference for cytoplasmic somatostatin receptor 5 expression.

Conclusions

Parathyroid adenomas, atypical adenomas and carcinomas all express somatostatin receptor subtypes 1–5. Somatostatin receptor 5 may serve as a potential tumor marker for malignancy. Studies exploring the role of somatostatin receptor imaging and receptor-specific therapies in patients with parathyroid carcinomas are needed.

Open access
Hanna Karhapää Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Hanna Karhapää in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Siru Mäkelä Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Siru Mäkelä in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hanna Laurén Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Hanna Laurén in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marjut Jaakkola Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Marjut Jaakkola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Camilla Schalin-Jäntti Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Endocrinology, Abdominal Centre, University of Helsinki and HUS, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Micaela Hernberg Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Micaela Hernberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can cause endocrine adverse events. However, endocrine AEs could be related to better treatment outcomes. Our aim was to investigate whether this holds true in a real-world setting of metastatic melanoma patients.

Design

A retrospective single-institution study.

Methods

We included 140 consecutive metastatic melanoma patients treated with ICI between January 2012 and May 2019. We assessed the endocrine toxicity and the best possible treatment outcomes from electronic patient records, including laboratory parameters and radiological images.

Results

Of the treated patients, 21 patients (15%) were treated with ipilimumab, 46 (33%) with nivolumab, 67 (48%) with pembrolizumab, and 6 (4%) with combination therapy (ipilimumab + nivolumab). Endocrine AEs appeared in 29% (41/140) patients. Three patients had two different endocrine AEs. Thyroid disorders were the most common: 26% (36/140), followed by hypophysitis: 4% (5/140). Three subjects (2%, 3/140) were diagnosed with autoimmune diabetes. Three patients had to terminate treatment due to endocrine toxicity. Radiological manifestations of endocrine AEs were found in 16 patients (39%, 16/41). Endocrine toxicity was associated with significantly better treatment outcomes. Median progression-free survival (8.1 months, range 5.1–11.1 months vs 2.7 months, range 2.4–3.0 months, P < 0.001), and median overall survival (47.5 months, range 15.5–79.5 months vs 23.7 months, range 15.3–32.1 months, P = 0.035) were longer for patients experiencing endocrine AEs.

Conclusions

The higher number of endocrine AEs suggest that regular laboratory monitoring aids in AE detection. Endocrine AEs in metastatic melanoma may correlate with better treatment outcomes.

Open access
Violeta Iotova Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria

Search for other papers by Violeta Iotova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Camilla Schalin-Jäntti Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for other papers by Camilla Schalin-Jäntti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Charlotte Van Beuzekom Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Charlotte Van Beuzekom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Petra Bruegmann Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Petra Bruegmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Manuela Broesamle Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Manuela Broesamle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olaf Hiort Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alberto M Pereira Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Alberto M Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The current study aims to assess the development of the knowledge generation program of the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN) from its start in 2019 until December 2021, with special reference to webinars. We analyzed the number of webinars and live/postevent participants and whether participation and engagement of the attendees changed over time. A total of 30 (86%) self-prepared webinars comprising 300 h of knowledge and competence sharing were broadcasted (2019 – 3; 2020 – 13; 2021 – 14). A total of six webinars were broadcasted live prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (https://endo-ern.eu/events/webinars/). The most active main thematic group (MTG) was MTG3 Genetic Disorders of Glucose and Insulin Homeostasis with eight (27%) webinars. Two (25%) MTGs fulfilled the goal to prepare at least two to three webinars per year. Patients were actively involved in 20% of the accounted webinars as both creators and presenters. The total number of live and postevent participants was 3023. The availability of the webinars after the live broadcast increased their outreach with a larger number of postevent viewers (n = 1629, 54%). Within the formal structured evaluation of the webinars, 40–85% of the participants replied on separate occasions and helped improve content. The free webinar access is among the perceived reasons for the rapidly increasing number of total hits to the Endo-ERN website. In conclusion, for its short existence, the Endo-ERN rapidly developed educational outreach, and further efforts to attract creators and learners are warranted.

Open access