Search Results
Search for other papers by Giorgio Bedogni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Mari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandra De Col in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sofia Tamini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amalia Gastaldelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Division of Metabolic Diseases and Auxology, Piancavallo (VB), Italy
Search for other papers by Alessandro Sartorio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Few data are available on the association between serum lipids and insulin secretion (ISEC) in children. We evaluated the association of triglycerides (TG), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with ISEC in 1150 non-diabetic obese children and adolescents using multivariable robust median regression. The following models were employed: (1) IGI or incAUCR as the ISEC response variable; (2) QUICKI, OGIS, the Stumvoll index or the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index as the insulin sensitivity (ISEN) predictor; (3) TG, HDL-C and LDL-C as the predictors of interest; (4) 120-min glucose, age, sex and body mass index as confounders. LDL-C and TG were not associated with ISEC in any model. In three out of four IGI models, an increase of 1 interquartile range (IQR) of HDL-C was associated with a decrease of median incAUCR ranging from −9 (robust 95% CI −17 to −2) to −8 (−14 to −1) pmol/mmol. In two out of four incAUCR models, an increase of 1 IQR of HDL-C was associated with a decrease of median IGI ranging from −8 (−15 to −1) to −7 (−11 to −2) pmol/mmol. TG and LDL-C are not associated and HDL-C is inversely associated with ISEC in obese children and adolescents.
Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Search for other papers by Jukka Koffert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Henri Honka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jarmo Teuho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Saila Kauhanen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Saija Hurme in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Search for other papers by Riitta Parkkola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vesa Oikonen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Mari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Lindqvist in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nils Wierup in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leif Groop in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Search for other papers by Pirjo Nuutila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Meal ingestion is followed by a redistribution of blood flow (BF) within the splanchnic region contributing to nutrient absorption, insulin secretion and glucose disposal, but factors regulating this phenomenon in humans are poorly known. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the organ-specific changes in BF during a mixed-meal and incretin infusions.
Design
A non-randomized intervention study of 10 healthy adults to study splanchnic BF regulation was performed.
Methods
Effects of glucose-dependent insulinotrophic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) infusions and mixed-meal were tested in 10 healthy, glucose tolerant subjects using PET-MRI multimodal imaging technology. Intestinal and pancreatic BF and blood volume (BV) were measured with 15O-water and 15O-carbon monoxide, respectively.
Results
Ingestion of a mixed-meal led to an increase in pancreatic and jejunal BF, whereas duodenal BF was unchanged. Infusion of GIP and GLP-1 reduced BF in the pancreas. However, GIP infusion doubled blood flow in the jejunum with no effect of GLP-1.
Conclusion
Together, our data suggest that meal ingestion leads to increases in pancreatic BF accompanied by a GIP-mediated increase in jejunal but not duodenal blood flow.
Search for other papers by Henri Honka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Gastroenterology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Search for other papers by Jukka Koffert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Saila Kauhanen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nobuyuki Kudomi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Saija Hurme in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Mari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Lindqvist in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nils Wierup in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Riitta Parkkola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leif Groop in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Search for other papers by Pirjo Nuutila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Aims/hypothesis
The mechanisms for improved glycemic control after bariatric surgery in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are not fully known. We hypothesized that dynamic hepatic blood responses to a mixed-meal are changed after bariatric surgery in parallel with an improvement in glucose tolerance.
Methods
A total of ten morbidly obese subjects with T2D were recruited to receive a mixed-meal and a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) infusion before and early after (within a median of less than three months) bariatric surgery, and hepatic blood flow and volume (HBV) were measured repeatedly with combined positron emission tomography/MRI. Ten lean non-diabetic individuals served as controls.
Results
Bariatric surgery leads to a significant decrease in weight, accompanied with an improved β-cell function and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion, and a reduction in liver volume. Blood flow in portal vein (PV) was increased by 1.65-fold (P = 0.026) in response to a mixed-meal in subjects after surgery, while HBV decreased in all groups (P < 0.001). When the effect of GIP infusion was tested separately, no change in hepatic arterial and PV flow was observed, but HBV decreased as seen during the mixed-meal test.
Conclusions/interpretation
Early after bariatric surgery, PV flow response to a mixed-meal is augmented, improving digestion and nutrient absorption. GIP influences the post-prandial reduction in HBV thereby diverting blood to the extrahepatic sites.
Search for other papers by Taísa A R Vicente in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ívina E S Rocha in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roberto Salvatori in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carla R P Oliveira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rossana M C Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anita H O Souza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Viviane C Campos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elenilde G Santos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel D C Araújo Diniz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eugênia H O Valença in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos C Epitácio-Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mario C P Oliveira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Mari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuel H Aguiar-Oliveira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objectives
Adult subjects with untreated, lifetime, isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) due to a homozygous GHRH receptor gene mutation (MUT/MUT) residing in Itabaianinha, Brazil, present with lower BMI, higher prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), increased insulin sensitivity (IS), and reduced β-cell function (βCF) when compared with non-BMI-matched homozygous normal controls. However, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in this cohort is unknown. Comparing their IS and βCF with BMI-matched individuals heterozygous for the same mutation (MUT/N) may be useful to elucidate the role of the GH–IGF1 axis in IS and βCF. The purposes of this work were to verify the prevalence of IGT and DM in adult MUT/MUT subjects from this kindred and to compare IS and βCF in MUT/MUT and MUT/N.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Methods
We studied most (51) of the living IGHD adults of this kindred who are GH naive. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) could be performed in 34 subjects, fasting glucose was measured in 15, while two had a previous diagnosis of DM. The OGTT results of 24 MUT/MUT subjects were compared with those of 25 BMI-matched MUT/N subjects. IS was assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA–IR), quantitative IS check index, and oral glucose IS index for 2 and 3 h. βCF was assayed by HOMA-β, insulinogenic index, and the area under the curve of insulin:glucose ratio.
Results
The prevalence of DM and IGT in IGHD was 15.68 and 38.23% respectively. IS was increased and βCF was reduced in MUT/MUT in comparison with MUT/N.
Conclusions
Lifetime, untreated IGHD increases IS, impairs βCF, and does not provide protection from diabetes.
