Search Results
Search for other papers by Dirk-Jan van Beek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel S van Leeuwaarde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carolina R C Pieterman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Menno R Vriens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Parelsnoer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Gerlof D Valk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by the DutchMEN Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rare diseases pose specific challenges in the field of medical research to provide physicians with evidence-based guidelines derived from studies with sufficient quality. An example of these rare diseases is multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), which is an autosomal dominant endocrine tumor syndrome with an estimated occurrence rate of 2–3 per 100,000. For this complex disease, characterized by multiple endocrine tumors, it proves difficult to perform both adequate and feasible studies. The opinion of patients themselves is of utmost importance to identify the gaps in the evidence-based medicine regarding clinical care. In the search for scientific answers to clinical research questions, the aim for best available evidence is obvious. Observational studies within patient cohorts, although prone to bias, seem the most feasible study design regarding the disease prevalence. Knowledge and adaptation to all types of bias is demanded in the strive for answers. Guided by our research on MEN1 patients, we elaborate on strategies to identify sufficient patients, to maximize and maintain patient enrolment and to standardize the data collection process. Preferably, data collection is performed prospectively, however, under certain conditions, data storage in a longitudinal retrospective database with a disease-specific framework is suitable. Considering the global challenges on observational research on rare diseases, we propose a stepwise approach from clinical research questions to scientific answers.
Search for other papers by T L C Wolters in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by C D C C van der Heijden in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N van Leeuwen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B T P Hijmans-Kersten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M G Netea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J W A Smit in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
Search for other papers by D H J Thijssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A R M M Hermus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N P Riksen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R T Netea-Maier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Acromegaly is characterized by an excess of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are common in acromegaly and often persist after treatment. Both acute and long-lasting pro-inflammatory effects have been attributed to IGF1. Therefore, we hypothesized that inflammation persists in treated acromegaly and may contribute to CVD risk.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, we assessed cardiovascular structure and function, and inflammatory parameters in treated acromegaly patients. Immune cell populations and inflammatory markers were assessed in peripheral blood from 71 treated acromegaly patients (with controlled or uncontrolled disease) and 41 matched controls. Whole blood (WB) was stimulated with Toll-like receptor ligands. In a subgroup of 21 controls and 33 patients with controlled disease, vascular ultrasound measurements were performed.
Results
Leukocyte counts were lower in patients with controlled acromegaly compared to patients with uncontrolled acromegaly and controls. Circulating IL18 concentrations were lower in patients; concentrations of other inflammatory mediators were comparable with controls. In stimulated WB, cytokine production was skewed toward inflammation in patients, most pronounced in those with uncontrolled disease. Vascular measurements in controlled patients showed endothelial dysfunction as indicated by a lower flow-mediated dilatation/nitroglycerine-mediated dilatation ratio. Surprisingly, pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity, both markers of endothelial dysfunction, were lower in patients, whereas intima-media thickness did not differ.
Conclusions
Despite treatment, acromegaly patients display persistent inflammatory changes and endothelial dysfunction, which may contribute to CVD risk and development of CVD.
