Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :
- Author: Srdjan Pandurevic x
- Reproduction x
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Srdjan Pandurevic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Ilaria Mancini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Dimitri Mitselman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Matteo Magagnoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Rita Teglia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Roberta Fazzeri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Paola Dionese in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Carolina Cecchetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Endocrinology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
Search for other papers by Massimiliamo Caprio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Costanzo Moretti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justyna Sicinska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Agostini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Domenica Gazineo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lea Godino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Medical Department Pronokal Group, Barcelona, Spain
Search for other papers by Ignacio Sajoux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Flaminia Fanelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Cristina M Meriggiola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Uberto Pagotto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Alessandra Gambineri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The aim of this study isto assess the efficacy of a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) method vs a Mediterranean low-calorie diet (LCD) in obese polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women of a reproductive age.
Design
Randomized controlled open-label trial was performed in this study. The treatment period was 16 weeks; VLCKD for 8 weeks then LCD for 8 weeks, according to the Pronokal® method (experimental group; n = 15) vs Mediterranean LCD for 16 weeks (control group; n = 15). Ovulation monitoring was carried out at baseline and after 16 weeks, while a clinical exam, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), anthropometry, and biochemical analyses were performed at baseline, at week 8, and at week 16.
Results
BMI decreased significantly in both groups and to a major extent in the experimental group (−13.7% vs −5.1%, P = 0.0003). Significant differences between the experimental and the control groups were also observed in the reduction of waist circumference (−11.4% vs −2.9%), BIA-measured body fat (−24.0% vs −8.1%), and free testosterone (−30.4% vs −12.6%) after 16 weeks (P = 0.0008, P = 0.0176, and P = 0.0009, respectively). Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance significantly decreased only in the experimental group (P = 0.0238) but without significant differences with respect to the control group (−23% vs −13.2%, P > 0.05). At baseline, 38.5% of participants in the experimental group and 14.3% of participants in the control group had ovulation, which increased to 84.6% (P = 0.031) and 35.7% (P > 0.05) at the end of the study, respectively.
Conclusion
In obese PCOS patients, 16 weeks of VLCKD protocol with the Pronokal® method was more effective than Mediterranean LCD in reducing total and visceral fat, and in ameliorating hyperandrogenism and ovulatory dysfunction.
Significance statements
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial on the use of the VLCKD method in obese PCOS. It demonstrates the superiority of VLCKD with respect to Mediterranean LCD in reducing BMI with an almost selective reduction of fat mass and a unique effect of VLCKD in reducing visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, and in increasing SHBG with a consequent reduction of free testosterone. Interestingly, this study also demonstrates the superiority of the VLCKD protocol in improving ovulation, whose occurrence increased by 46.1% in the group treated by the VLCKD method against a rise of 21.4% in the group treated by Mediterranean LCD. This study extends the therapeutic approach possibilities in obese PCOS women.
