Search Results
Search for other papers by Dafydd Aled Rees in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Deborah P Merke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wiebke Arlt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aude Brac De La Perriere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelica Linden Hirschberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anders Juul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John Newell-Price in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Prete in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicole Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nike M Stikkelbroeck in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe A Touraine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alex Lewis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John Porter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helen Coope in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard J Ross in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Prednisolone and prednisone are recommended treatment options for adults with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH); however, there is no randomised comparison of prednis(ol)one with hydrocortisone.
Design
Six-month open-label randomised phase 3 study and interim analysis of a single-arm extension study was the design of the study.
Methods
The method of the study was hydrocortisone dose equivalent and 09:00-h 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) from 48 patients taking prednis(ol)one at baseline.
Results
At baseline, the median hydrocortisone dose equivalent was 30 mg/day and 17OHP was < 36 nmol/L (3× upper limit of normal) in 56% of patients. Patients were randomised to continue prednis(ol)one or switch to modified-release hydrocortisone capsule (MRHC) at the same hydrocortisone-equivalent dose. At 4 weeks, 94% on MRHC and 71% on prednis(ol)one had 17OHP < 36 nmol/L. At 18 months in the extension study of MRHC, the median MRHC dose was 20 mg/day and 82% had 17OHP < 36 nmol/L. The per cent of patients with 17OHP < 36 nmol/L on a hydrocortisone dose equivalent ≤ 25 mg/day was greater at 18 months in the extension study on MRHC than while on prednis(ol)one at baseline: 57% vs 27%, P = 0.04. In the randomised study, no patients had an adrenal crisis on MRHC and one on prednisolone. In the extension study (221 patient years), there were 12 adrenal crises in 5 patients (5.4/100 patient years).
Conclusion
MRHC reduces 17OHP at 09:00 h compared to prednis(ol)one and the dose of MRHC can be down-titrated over time in the majority of patients.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Luca Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martine Cools in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stamatina Ioakim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Faisal Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Silvia Andonova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Magdalena Avbelj-Stefanija in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Baronio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jerome Bouligand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hennie T Bruggenwirth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin H Davies in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elfride De Baere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Iveta Dzivite-Krisane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paula Fernandez-Alvarez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Gheldof in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Claudia Giavoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claus H Gravholt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Hiort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul-Martin Holterhus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anders Juul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Csilla Krausz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
West of Scotland Centre for Genomic Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Search for other papers by Ruth McGowan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Uta Neumann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Novelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xavier Peyrassol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonidas A Phylactou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julia Rohayem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Touraine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dineke Westra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Valeria Vezzoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raffaella Rossetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Differences of sex development and maturation (SDM) represent a heterogeneous puzzle of rare conditions with a large genetic component whose management and treatment could be improved by an accurate classification of underlying molecular conditions, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) should represent the most appropriate approach. Therefore, we conducted a survey dedicated to the use and potential outcomes of NGS for SDM disorders diagnosis among the 53 health care providers (HCP) of the European Reference Network for rare endocrine conditions. The response rate was 49% with a total of 26 HCPs from 13 countries. All HCPs, except 1, performed NGS investigations for SDM disorders on 6720 patients, 3764 (56%) with differences of sex development (DSD), including 811 unexplained primary ovarian insufficiency, and 2956 (44%) with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). The approaches varied from targeted analysis of custom gene panels (range: 11–490 genes) in 81.5% of cases or whole exome sequencing with the extraction of a virtual panel in the remaining cases. These analyses were performed for diagnostic purposes in 21 HCPs, supported by the National Health Systems in 16 cases. The likelihood of finding a variant ranged between 7 and 60%, mainly depending upon the number of analysed genes or criteria used for reporting, most HCPs also reporting variants of uncertain significance. These data illustrate the status of genetic diagnosis of DSD and CHH across Europe. In most countries, these analyses are performed for diagnostic purposes, yielding highly variable results, thus suggesting the need for harmonization and general improvements of NGS approaches.
