Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :
- Author: Irène Netchine x
- Paediatric Endocrinology x
Search for other papers by Muriel Houang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thao Nguyen-Khoa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Département de Métabolomique Clinique, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Thibaut Eguether in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Département de Métabolomique Clinique, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Bettina Ribault in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Séverine Brabant in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Université de Paris, INSERM, Institut IMAGINE, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Michel Polak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
Hôpital Armand Trousseau, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Irène Netchine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Département de Métabolomique Clinique, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Antonin Lamazière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) faces many specific challenges. It must be done using a performant analytical approach that combines sensitivity and specificity to capture the potential causes of mortality during the first week of life, such as salt wasting and glucocorticoid deficiency. Here, we confirm that maternal inhaled corticosteroid intake during pregnancy is a possible cause of missed CAH diagnosis. Thanks to liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis, we were able to quantify endogenous steroid metabolites and also detect the presence of exogenous steroids in the dried blood spot of a newborn. Adding LC-MS/MS analysis as second-tier test, especially one that includes both 17-hydroxyprogesterone and 21-deoxycortisol measurements, would probably improve CAH diagnosis. In familial neonatal screening one could also look for maternal corticosteroid therapies that are hidden to prevent false-negative tests.
Search for other papers by Danielle Christine Maria van der Kaay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Rochtus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gerhard Binder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ingo Kurth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dirk Prawitt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Irène Netchine in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Search for other papers by Gudmundur Johannsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anita C S Hokken-Koelega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miriam Elbracht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Eggermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The implementation of high-throughput and deep sequencing methods in routine genetic diagnostics has significantly improved the diagnostic yield in patient cohorts with growth disturbances and becomes increasingly important as the prerequisite of personalized medicine. They provide considerable chances to identify even rare and unexpected situations; nevertheless, we must be aware of their limitations. A simple genetic test in the beginning of a testing cascade might also help to identify the genetic cause of specific growth disorders. However, the clinical picture of genetically caused growth disturbance phenotypes can vary widely, and there is a broad clinical overlap between different growth disturbance disorders. As a consequence, the clinical diagnosis and therewith connected the decision on the appropriate genetic test is often a challenge. In fact, the clinician asking for genetic testing has to weigh different aspects in this decision process, including appropriateness (single gene test, stepwise procedure, comprehensive testing), turnaround time as the basis for rapid intervention, and economic considerations. Therefore, a frequent question in that context is ‘what to test when’. In this review, we aim to review genetic testing strategies and their strengths and limitations and to raise awareness for the future implementation of interdisciplinary genome medicine in diagnoses, treatment, and counselling of growth disturbances.
