Search Results
Search for other papers by Alessandro Brancatella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudio Marcocci in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Thyroid hormones stimulate bone turnover in adults by increasing osteoclastic bone resorption. TSH suppressive therapy is usually applied in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) to improve the disease outcome. Over the last decades several authors have closely monitored the potential harm suffered by the skeletal system. Several studies and meta-analyses have shown that chronic TSH suppressive therapy is safe in premenopausal women and men. Conversely, in postmenopausal women TSH suppressive therapy is associated with a decrease of bone mineral density, deterioration of bone architecture (quantitative CT, QCT; trabecular bone score, TBS), and, possibly, an increased risk of fractures. The TSH receptor is expressed in bone cells and the results of experimental studies in TSH receptor knockout mice and humans on whether low TSH levels, as opposed to solely high thyroid hormone levels, might contribute to bone loss in endogenous or exogenous thyrotoxicosis remain controversial. Recent guidelines on the use of TSH suppressive therapy in patients with DTC give value not only to its benefit on the outcome of the disease, but also to the risks associated with exogenous thyrotoxicosis, namely menopause, osteopenia or osteoporosis, age >60 years, and history of atrial fibrillation. Bone health (BMD and/or preferably TBS) should be evaluated in postmenopausal women under chronic TSH suppressive therapy or in those patients planning to be treated for several years. Antiresorptive therapy could also be considered in selected cases (increased risk of fracture or significant decline of BMD/TBS during therapy) to prevent bone loss.
Search for other papers by Keina Nishio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Akiko Tanabe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Risa Maruoka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kiyoko Nakamura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Masaaki Takai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tatsuharu Sekijima in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Satoshi Tunetoh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yoshito Terai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Masahide Ohmichi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Although surgical menopause may increase the risks of osteoporosis, few studies have investigated the influence of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of treatments for gynecological malignancies on bone mineral density (BMD).
Methods
This study enrolled 35 premenopausal women (15 ovarian cancers (OCs), 9 endometrial cancers (ECs), and 11 cervical cancers (CCs)) who underwent surgical treatment that included bilateral oophorectomy with or without adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in OC and EC patients, or concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (CCRT) in CC patients according to the established protocols at the Osaka Medical College Hospital between 2006 and 2008. The BMD of the lumbar spine (L1–L4) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and urine cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) were assessed for evaluation of bone resorption and bone formation respectively. These assessments were performed at baseline and 12 months after treatment.
Results
Although the serum BAP was significantly increased only in the CC group, a rapid increase in the bone resorption marker urinary NTx was observed in all groups. The BMD, 12 months after CCRT was significantly decreased in the CC group at 91.9±5.9% (P<0.05 in comparison to the baseline).
Conclusion
This research suggests that anticancer therapies for premenopausal women with gynecological malignancies increase bone resorption and may reduce BMD, particularly in CC patients who have received CCRT. Therefore, gynecologic cancer survivors should be educated about these potential risks and complications.
Search for other papers by Nancy Martini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lucas Streckwall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Desmond McCarthy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In post-menopausal women, aged individuals, and patients with diabetes mellitus or chronic renal disease, bone mineral density (BMD) decreases while the vasculature accumulates arterial calcifications (ACs). AC can be found in the tunica intima and/or in the tunica media. Prospective studies have shown that patients with initially low BMD and/or the presence of fragility fractures have at follow-up a significantly increased risk for coronary and cerebrovascular events and for overall cardiovascular mortality. Similarly, patients presenting with abdominal aorta calcifications (an easily quantifiable marker of vascular pathology) show a significant decrease in the BMD (and an increase in the fragility) of bones irrigated by branches of the abdominal aorta, such as the hip and lumbar spine. AC induction is an ectopic tissue biomineralization process promoted by osteogenic transdifferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells as well as by local and systemic secreted factors. In many cases, the same regulatory molecules modulate bone metabolism but in reverse. Investigation of animal and in vitro models has identified several potential mechanisms for this reciprocal bone–vascular regulation, such as vitamin K and D sufficiency, advanced glycation end-products–RAGE interaction, osteoprotegerin/RANKL/RANK, Fetuin A, oestrogen deficiency and phytooestrogen supplementation, microbiota and its relation to diet, among others. Complete elucidation of these potential mechanisms, as well as their clinical validation via controlled studies, will provide a basis for pharmacological intervention that could simultaneously promote bone and vascular health.
Search for other papers by Gabriella Oliveira Lima in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alex Luiz Menezes da Silva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julianne Elba Cunha Azevedo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chirlene Pinheiro Nascimento in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luana Rodrigues Vieira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Akira Otake Hamoy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luan Oliveira Ferreira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Verônica Regina Lobato Oliveira Bahia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nilton Akio Muto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dielly Catrina Favacho Lopes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moisés Hamoy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Low plasma levels of vitamin D causes bone mineral change that can precipitate osteopenia and osteoporosis and could aggravate autoimmune diseases, hypertension and diabetes. The demand for vitamin D supplementation becomes necessary; however, the consumption of vitamin D is not without risks, which its toxicity could have potentially serious consequences related to hypervitaminosis D, such as hypercalcemia and cerebral alterations. Thus, the present study describes the electroencephalographic changes caused by supraphysiological doses of vitamin D in the brain electrical dynamics and the electrocardiographic changes. After 4 days of treatment with vitamin D at a dose of 25,000 IU/kg, the serum calcium levels found were increased in comparison with the control group. The electrocorticogram analysis found a reduction in wave activity in the delta, theta, alpha and beta frequency bands. For ECG was observed changes with shortened QT follow-up, which could be related to serum calcium concentration. This study presented important evidence about the cerebral and cardiac alterations caused by high doses of vitamin D, indicating valuable parameters in the screening and decision-making process for diagnosing patients with symptoms suggestive of intoxication.
Search for other papers by Kaiyu Pan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chengyue Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiaocong Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhongxin Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Aim
Ensuring adequate calcium (Ca) intake during childhood and adolescence is critical to acquire good peak bone mass to prevent osteoporosis during older age. As one of the primary strategies to build and maintain healthy bones, we aimed to determine whether dietary Ca intake has an influence on bone mineral density (BMD) in children and adolescents.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study composed of 10,092 individuals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Dietary Ca intake and total BMD were taken as independent and dependent variables, respectively. To evaluate the association between them, we conducted weighted multivariate linear regression models and smooth curve fittings.
Results
There was a significantly positive association between dietary Ca intake and total BMD. The strongest association was observed in 12–15 year old whites, 8–11 year old and 16–19 year old Mexican Americans, and 16–19 year old individuals from other race/ethnicity, in whom each quintile of Ca intake was increased. We also found that there were significant inflection points in females, blacks, and 12–15 year old adolescents group, which means that their total BMD would decrease when the dietary Ca intake was more than 2.6–2.8 g/d.
Conclusions
This cross-sectional study indicated that a considerable proportion of children and adolescents aged 8–19 years would attain greater total BMD if they increased their dietary Ca intake. However, higher dietary Ca intake (more than 2.6–2.8 g/d) is associated with lower total BMD in females, blacks, and 12–15 year old adolescents group.
K.G. Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Disorders, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Elinor Chelsom Vogt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Francisco Gómez Real in
Google Scholar
PubMed
K.G. Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Disorders, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Eystein Sverre Husebye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other papers by Sigridur Björnsdottir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Sleep, Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavík, Reykjavik, Iceland
Search for other papers by Bryndis Benediktsdottir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Randi Jacobsen Bertelsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pascal Demoly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karl Anders Franklin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leire Sainz de Aja Gallastegui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francisco Javier Callejas González in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Search for other papers by Joachim Heinrich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mathias Holm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nils Oscar Jogi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benedicte Leynaert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eva Lindberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrei Malinovschi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Albacete Faculty of Medicine, Castilla-La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain
Search for other papers by Jesús Martínez-Moratalla in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raúl Godoy Mayoral in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Oudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Pereira-Vega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chantal Raherison Semjen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The National Research Center for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Vivi Schlünssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kai Triebner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
K.G. Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Disorders, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Search for other papers by Marianne Øksnes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
To investigate markers of premature menopause (<40 years) and specifically the prevalence of autoimmune primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) in European women.
Design
Postmenopausal women were categorized according to age at menopause and self-reported reason for menopause in a cross-sectional analysis of 6870 women.
Methods
Variables associated with the timing of menopause and hormone measurements of 17β-estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Specific immunoprecipitating assays of steroidogenic autoantibodies against 21-hydroxylase (21-OH), side-chain cleavage enzyme (anti-SCC) and 17alpha-hydroxylase (17 OH), as well as NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 5 were used to identify women with likely autoimmune POI.
Results
Premature menopause was identified in 2.8% of women, and these women had higher frequencies of nulliparity (37.4% vs 19.7%), obesity (28.7% vs 21.4%), osteoporosis (17.1% vs 11.6%), hormone replacement therapy (59.1% vs 36.9%) and never smokers (60.1% vs 50.9%) (P < 0.05), compared to women with menopause ≥40 years. Iatrogenic causes were found in 91 (47%) and non-ovarian causes in 27 (14%) women, while 77 (39%) women were classified as POI of unknown cause, resulting in a 1.1% prevalence of idiopathic POI. After adjustments nulliparity was the only variable significantly associated with POI (odds ratio 2.46; 95% CI 1.63–3.42). Based on the presence of autoantibodies against 21 OH and SCC, 4.5% of POI cases were of likely autoimmune origin.
Conclusion
Idiopathic POI affects 1.1% of all women and almost half of the women with premature menopause. Autoimmunity explains 4.5% of these cases judged by positive steroidogenic autoantibodies.
Search for other papers by E M Winter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Ireland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N C Butterfield in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Haffner-Luntzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M-N Horcajada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Jan van Goyen Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by A G Veldhuis-Vlug in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by L Oei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Colaianni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Bonnet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In this review we discuss skeletal adaptations to the demanding situation of pregnancy and lactation. Calcium demands are increased during pregnancy and lactation, and this is effectuated by a complex series of hormonal changes. The changes in bone structure at the tissue and whole bone level observed during pregnancy and lactation appear to largely recover over time. The magnitude of the changes observed during lactation may relate to the volume and duration of breastfeeding and return to regular menses. Studies examining long-term consequences of pregnancy and lactation suggest that there are small, site-specific benefits to bone density and that bone geometry may also be affected. Pregnancy- and lactation-induced osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare disease for which the pathophysiological mechanism is as yet incompletely known; here, we discuss and speculate on the possible roles of genetics, oxytocin, sympathetic tone and bone marrow fat. Finally, we discuss fracture healing during pregnancy and lactation and the effects of estrogen on this process.
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Life Sciences, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Search for other papers by Marcela Moraes Mendes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patricia Borges Botelho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helena Ribeiro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Vitamin D enhances calcium absorption and bone mineralisation, promotes maintenance of muscle function, and is crucial for musculoskeletal health. Low vitamin D status triggers secondary hyperparathyroidism, increases bone loss, and leads to muscle weakness. The primary physiologic function of vitamin D and its metabolites is maintaining calcium homeostasis for metabolic functioning, signal transduction, and neuromuscular activity. A considerable amount of human evidence supports the well-recognised contribution of adequate serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations for bone homeostasis maintenance and prevention and treatment strategies for osteoporosis when combined with adequate calcium intake. This paper aimed to review the literature published, mainly in the last 20 years, on the effect of vitamin D and its supplementation for musculoskeletal health in order to identify the aspects that remain unclear or controversial and therefore require further investigation and debate. There is a clear need for consistent data to establish realistic and meaningful recommendations of vitamin D status that consider different population groups and locations. Moreover, there is still a lack of consensus on thresholds for vitamin D deficiency and optimal status as well as toxicity, optimal intake of vitamin D, vitamin D supplement alone as a strategy to prevent fractures and falls, recommended sun exposure at different latitudes and for different skin pigmentations, and the extra skeletal effects of vitamin D.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Rong Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Beijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Difei Lian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Beijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Yan Xie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Beijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Lin Mu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Beijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Yali Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Beijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Zhilei Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Beijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Beijing, China
Search for other papers by Baoyu Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic bone disease in which bone density and quality decrease and bone fragility increases due to a variety of causes, making it prone to fractures. The development of OP is closely related to oxidative stress. Uric acid (UA) is the end product of purine metabolism in the human body. Extracellular UA has antioxidant properties and is thought to have a protective effect on bone metabolism. However, the process of UA degradation can lead to intracellular oxidative stress, which together with UA-induced inflammatory factors, leads to increased bone destruction. In addition, UA can inhibit vitamin D production, resulting in secondary hyperparathyroidism and further exacerbating UA-associated bone loss. This review summarizes the relationship between serum UA levels and bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and so on, in the hope of providing new insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of OP.
Search for other papers by Silvia Ciancia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vanessa Dubois in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martine Cools in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Both in the United States and Europe, the number of minors who present at transgender healthcare services before the onset of puberty is rapidly expanding. Many of those who will have persistent gender dysphoria at the onset of puberty will pursue long-term puberty suppression before reaching the appropriate age to start using gender-affirming hormones. Exposure to pubertal sex steroids is thus significantly deferred in these individuals. Puberty is a critical period for bone development: increasing concentrations of estrogens and androgens (directly or after aromatization to estrogens) promote progressive bone growth and mineralization and induce sexually dimorphic skeletal changes. As a consequence, safety concerns regarding bone development and increased future fracture risk in transgender youth have been raised. We here review published data on bone development in transgender adolescents, focusing in particular on differences in age and pubertal stage at the start of puberty suppression, chosen strategy to block puberty progression, duration of puberty suppression, and the timing of re-evaluation after estradiol or testosterone administration. Results consistently indicate a negative impact of long-term puberty suppression on bone mineral density, especially at the lumbar spine, which is only partially restored after sex steroid administration. Trans girls are more vulnerable than trans boys for compromised bone health. Behavioral health measures that can promote bone mineralization, such as weight-bearing exercise and calcium and vitamin D supplementation, are strongly recommended in transgender youth, during the phase of puberty suppression and thereafter.
