Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for :
- Abstract: adrenarche x
- Abstract: amenorrhoea x
- Abstract: fertility x
- Abstract: Gender x
- Abstract: Hypogonadism x
- Abstract: infertility x
- Abstract: Kallmann x
- Abstract: Klinefelter x
- Abstract: menarche x
- Abstract: menopause x
- Abstract: puberty x
- Abstract: transsexual x
- Abstract: sperm* x
- Abstract: ovary x
- Hormones and Cancer x
Search for other papers by Enrique Pedernera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Flavia Morales-Vásquez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María J Gómora in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miguel A Almaraz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad La Salle, Posgrado de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Ciudad de México, México
Search for other papers by Esteban Mena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Delia Pérez-Montiel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth Rendon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Horacio López-Basave in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juan Maldonado-Cubas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carmen Méndez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The incidence of ovarian cancer has been epidemiologically related to female reproductive events and hormone replacement therapy after menopause. This highlights the importance of evaluating the role of sexual steroid hormones in ovarian cancer by the expression of enzymes related to steroid hormone biosynthesis in the tumor cells. This study was aimed to evaluate the presence of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17β-HSD1), aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in the tumor cells and their association with the overall survival in 111 patients diagnosed with primary ovarian tumors. Positive immunoreactivity for 17β-HSD1 was observed in 74% of the tumors. In the same samples, aromatase and ERα revealed 66% and 47% positivity, respectively. No association was observed of 17β-HSD1 expression with the histological subtypes and clinical stages of the tumor. The overall survival of patients was improved in 17β-HSD1-positive group in Kaplan–Meier analysis (P = 0.028), and 17β-HSD1 expression had a protective effect from multivariate proportional regression evaluation (HR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.24–0.9; P = 0.040). The improved survival was observed in serous epithelial tumors but not in nonserous ovarian tumors. The expression of 17β-HSD1 in the cells of the serous epithelial ovarian tumors was associated with an improved overall survival, whereas aromatase and ERα were not related to a better survival. The evaluation of hazard risk factors demonstrated that age and clinical stage showed worse prognosis, and 17β-HSD1 expression displayed a protective effect with a better survival outcome in patients of epithelial ovarian tumors.
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Josephina G Kuiper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Aline C Fenneman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne H van der Spek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elena Rampanelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Max Nieuwdorp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Valery E P P Lemmens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ernst J Kuipers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Ron M C Herings in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Fliers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Whether an association between oral levothyroxine use, leading to supraphysiological exposure of the colon to thyroid hormones, and risk of colorectal cancer exists in humans is unclear. We therefore aimed to assess whether the use of levothyroxine is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer in a linked cohort of pharmacy and cancer data.
Design
Population-based matched case–control study.
Methods
A total of 28,121 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1998 and 2014 were matched to 106,086 controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between levothyroxine use and occurrence of colorectal cancer, adjusted for potential confounders. Results were stratified by gender, age, tumour subtype, and staging, as well as treatment duration and dosing.
Results
A total of 1066 colorectal cancer patients (4%) and 4024 (4%) controls had used levothyroxine at any point before index date (adjusted odds ratio 0.95 (0.88–1.01)). Long-term use of levothyroxine was seen in 323 (30%) colorectal cancer patients and 1111 (28%) controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.00 (0.88–1.13)). Stratification by tumour subsite showed a borderline significant risk reduction of rectal cancer, while this was not seen for proximal colon cancer or distal colon cancer. There was no relationship with treatment duration or with levothyroxine dose.
Conclusions
In this study, no reduced risk of colorectal cancer was seen in levothyroxine users. When stratifying by tumour subsite, a borderline significant risk reduction of rectal cancer was found and may warrant further research.
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Nikolaos Kyriakakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marilena Giannoudi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Satish S Kumar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Khyatisha Seejore in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgios K Dimitriadis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harpal Randeva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Adam Glaser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michelle Kwok-Williams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgina Gerrard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carmel Loughrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Al-Qaissi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ramzi Ajjan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie Lynch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Robert D Murray in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Survivors of childhood brain tumours (SCBT) and teenage and young adult cancer survivors have an adverse cardiovascular risk profile, which translates into an increased vascular mortality. Data on cardiovascular risk profiles in SCBT are limited, and furthermore, there are no data in adult-onset (AO) brain tumours.
Patients and
methods: Fasting lipids, glucose, insulin, 24-h blood pressure (BP), and body composition were measured in 36 brain tumour survivors (20 AO; 16 childhood-onset (CO)) and 36 age- and gender-matched controls.
Results
Compared with controls, patients had elevated total cholesterol (5.3 ± 1.1 vs 4.6 ± 1.0 mmol/L, P = 0.007), LDL-C (3.1 ± 0.8 vs 2.7 ± 0.9 mmol/L, P = 0.011), insulin (13.4 ± 13.1 vs 7.6 ± 3.3 miu/L, P = 0.014), and increased insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) 2.90 ± 2.84 vs 1.66 ± 0.73, P = 0.016). Patients showed adverse body composition, with increased total body fat mass (FM) (24.0 ± 12.2 vs 15.7 ± 6.6 kg, P < 0.001) and truncal FM (13.0 ± 6.7 vs 8.2 ± 3.7 kg, P < 0.001).
After stratification by timing of onset, CO survivors showed significantly increased LDL-C, insulin, and HOMA-IR compared with controls. Body composition was characterized by the increased total body and truncal FM. Truncal fat mass was increased by 84.1% compared with controls. AO survivors showed similar adverse cardiovascular risk profiles, with increased total cholesterol and HOMA-IR. Truncal FM was increased by 41.0% compared with matched controls (P = 0.029). No difference in mean 24-h BP was noted between patients and controls irrespective of the timing of cancer diagnosis.
Conclusion
The phenotype of both CO and AO brain tumour survivors is characterized by an adverse metabolic profile and body composition, putatively placing long-term survivors at increased risk of vascular morbidity and mortality.
