Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 10 of 423 items for
- Abstract: adrenarche x
- Abstract: amenorrhoea x
- Abstract: fertility x
- Abstract: Gender x
- Abstract: Hypogonadism x
- Abstract: infertility x
- Abstract: Kallmann x
- Abstract: Klinefelter x
- Abstract: menarche x
- Abstract: menopause x
- Abstract: puberty x
- Abstract: testes x
- Abstract: transsexual x
- Abstract: Turner x
Search for other papers by Alan D Rogol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The overall incidence of sex chromosome aneuploidies is approximately 1 per 500 live-born infants, but far more common at conception. I shall review the fertility aspects of the sex chromosome trisomies, XXY, XYY, and XXX, with special reference to the karyotype 45,X/47,XXX. Each has a ‘specific’ (but variable) phenotype but may be modified by mosaicism. Although the alterations in the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis are important (and discussed), the emphasis here is on potential fertility and if one might predict that at various epochs within an individual’s life span: fetal, ‘mini’-puberty, childhood, puberty, and adulthood. The reproductive axis is often affected in females with the 47,XXX karyotype with diminished ovarian reserve and accelerated loss of ovarian function. Fewer than 5% of females with Turner syndrome have the 45,X/47,XXX karyotype. They have taller stature and less severe fertility issues compared to females with the 45,X or other forms of Turner syndrome mosaicism. For the 47,XXY karyotype, non-obstructive azoospermia is almost universal with sperm retrieval by micro-testicular sperm extraction possible in slightly fewer than half of the men. Men with the 47,XYY karyotype have normal to large testes and much less testicular dysfunction than those with the 47,XXY karyotype. They do have a slight increase in infertility compared to the reference population but not nearly as severe as those with the 47,XXY karyotype. Assisted reproductive technology, especially micro-testicular sperm extraction, has an important role, especially for those with 47,XXY; however, more recent data show promising techniques for the in vitro maturation of spermatogonial stem cells and 3D organoids in culture. Assisted reproductive technology is more complex for the female, but vitrification of oocytes has shown promising advances.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other papers by Henrik Falhammar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hedi Claahsen-van der Grinten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicole Reisch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Astrid Lindgren Children Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other papers by Anna Nordenström in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robert Roehle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
Search for other papers by Claire Bouvattier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Baudewijntje P C Kreukels in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Birgit Köhler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by on behalf of the dsd-LIFE group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The knowledge about health status in adults with disorder of sex development (DSD) is scarce.
Design and methods
A cross-sectional observational study in 14 European tertiary centers recruited 1040 participants (717 females, 311 males, 12 others) with DSD. Mean age was 32.4 ± 13.6 year (range 16–75). The cohort was divided into: Turner (n = 301), Klinefelter (n = 224), XY-DSD (n = 222), XX-DSD (excluding congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) and 46,XX males) (n = 21), 46,XX-CAH (n = 226) and 45,X/46,XY (n = 45). Perceived and objective health statuses were measured and compared to European control data.
Results
In DSD, fair to very good general health was reported by 91.4% and only 8.6% reported (very) bad general health (controls 94.0% and 6.0%, P < 0.0001). Longstanding health issues other than DSD and feeling limited in daily life were reported in 51.0% and 38.6%, respectively (controls 24.5% and 13.8%, P < 0.0001 both). Any disorder except DSD was present in 84.3% (controls 24.6%, P < 0.0001). Males reported worse health than females. In the subgroup analysis, Klinefelter and 46,XX-DSD patients reported bad general health in 15.7% and 16.7%, respectively (Turner 3.2% and CAH 7.4%). Comorbidities were prevalent in all DSD subgroups but Klinefelter and Turner were most affected. Early diagnosis of DSD and a healthy lifestyle were associated with less comorbidities.
Conclusions
Overall, general health appeared to be good but a number of medical problems were reported, especially in Klinefelter and Turner. Early diagnosis of DSD and a healthy lifestyle seemed to be important. Lifelong follow-up at specialized centers is necessary.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for other papers by E Kohva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P J Miettinen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Search for other papers by S Taskinen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Hero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for other papers by A Tarkkanen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for other papers by T Raivio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
We describe the phenotypic spectrum and timing of diagnosis and management in a large series of patients with disorders of sexual development (DSD) treated in a single pediatric tertiary center.
Methods
DSD patients who had visited our tertiary center during the survey period (between 2004 and 2014) were identified based on an ICD-10 inquiry, and their phenotypic and molecular genetic findings were recorded from patient charts.
Results
Among the 550 DSD patients, 53.3% had 46,XY DSD; 37.1% had sex chromosome DSD and 9.6% had 46,XX DSD. The most common diagnoses were Turner syndrome (19.8%, diagnosed at the mean age of 4.7 ± 5.5 years), Klinefelter syndrome (14.5%, 6.8 ± 6.2 years) and bilateral cryptorchidism (23.1%). Very few patients with 46,XY DSD (7%) or 46,XX DSD (21%) had molecular genetic diagnosis. The yearly rate of DSD diagnoses remained stable over the survey period. After the release of the Nordic consensus on the management of undescended testes, the age at surgery for bilateral cryptorchidism declined significantly (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Our results show that (i) Turner syndrome and Klinefelter syndrome, the most frequent single DSD diagnoses, are still diagnosed relatively late; (ii) a temporal shift was observed in the management of bilateral cryptorchidism, which may favorably influence patients’ adulthood semen quality and (iii) next-generation sequencing methods are not fully employed in the diagnostics of DSD patients.
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for other papers by Helene Bandsholm Leere Tallaksen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for other papers by Emma B Johannsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jesper Just in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for other papers by Mette Hansen Viuff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Department of Endocrinology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for other papers by Claus H Gravholt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for other papers by Anne Skakkebæk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs) are chromosomal disorders with either a complete or partial loss or gain of sex chromosomes. The most frequent SCAs include Turner syndrome (45,X), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), Trisomy X syndrome (47,XXX), and Double Y syndrome (47,XYY). The phenotype seen in SCAs is highly variable and may not merely be due to the direct genomic imbalance from altered sex chromosome gene dosage but also due to additive alterations in gene networks and regulatory pathways across the genome as well as individual genetic modifiers. This review summarizes the current insight into the genomics of SCAs. In addition, future directions of research that can contribute to decipher the genomics of SCA are discussed such as single-cell omics, spatial transcriptomics, system biology thinking, human-induced pluripotent stem cells, and animal models, and how these data may be combined to bridge the gap between genomics and the clinical phenotype.
Search for other papers by Elin Kahlert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Endokrinologikum Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
Search for other papers by Martina Blaschke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Knut Brockmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Clemens Freiberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Onno E Janssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nikolaus Stahnke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Domenika Strik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Merkel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Mann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus-Peter Liesenkötter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Endokrinologikum Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
Search for other papers by Heide Siggelkow in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Turner syndrome (TS) is characterized by the complete or partial loss of the second sex chromosome and associated with a wide range of clinical manifestations. We aimed to assess the medical care of adult patients with TS in Germany.
Design
Retrospective multicenter observational study.
Methods
Data were collected from medical records of 258 women with TS treated between 2001 and 2017 in five non-university endocrinologic centers in Germany.
Results
Mean age was 29.8 ± 11.6 years, mean height 152 ± 7.7 cm, and mean BMI 26.6 ± 6.3 kg/m2. The karyotype was known in 50% of patients. Information on cholesterol state, liver enzymes, and thyroid status was available in 81–98% of women with TS; autoimmune thyroiditis was diagnosed in 37%. Echocardiography was performed in 42% and cardiac MRI in 8.5%, resulting in a diagnosis of cardiovascular disorder in 28%. Data on growth hormone therapy were available for 40 patients (15%) and data concerning menarche in 157 patients (61%).
Conclusion
In 258 women with TS, retrospective analysis of healthcare data indicated that medical management was focused on endocrine manifestations. Further significant clinical features including cardiovascular disease, renal malformation, liver involvement, autoimmune diseases, hearing loss, and osteoporosis were only marginally if at all considered. Based on this evaluation and in accordance with recent guidelines, we compiled a documentation form facilitating the transition from pediatric to adult care and further medical management of TS patients. The foundation of Turner Centers in March 2019 will improve the treatment of TS women in Germany.
Search for other papers by Anita Hokken-Koelega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aart-Jan van der Lely in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Berthold Hauffa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gabriele Häusler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gudmundur Johannsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mohamad Maghnie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jesús Argente in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean DeSchepper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Helena Gleeson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John W Gregory in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlotte Höybye in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fahrettin Keleştimur in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anton Luger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hermann L Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sebastian Neggers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vera Popovic-Brkic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eleonora Porcu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lars Sävendahl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen Shalet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bessie Spiliotis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maithé Tauber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Seamless transition of endocrine patients from the paediatric to adult setting is still suboptimal, especially in patients with complex disorders, i.e., small for gestational age, Turner or Prader–Willi syndromes; Childhood Cancer Survivors, and those with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency.
Methods
An expert panel meeting comprised of European paediatric and adult endocrinologists was convened to explore the current gaps in managing the healthcare of patients with endocrine diseases during transition from paediatric to adult care settings.
Results
While a consensus was reached that a team approach is best, discussions revealed that a ‘one size fits all’ model for transition is largely unsuccessful in these patients. They need more tailored care during adolescence to prevent complications like failure to achieve target adult height, reduced bone mineral density, morbid obesity, metabolic perturbations (obesity and body composition), inappropriate/inadequate puberty, compromised fertility, diminished quality of life and failure to adapt to the demands of adult life. Sometimes it is difficult for young people to detach emotionally from their paediatric endocrinologist and/or the abrupt change from an environment of parental responsibility to one of autonomy. Discussions about impending transition and healthcare autonomy should begin in early adolescence and continue throughout young adulthood to ensure seamless continuum of care and optimal treatment outcomes.
Conclusions
Even amongst a group of healthcare professionals with a great interest in improving transition services for patients with endocrine diseases, there is still much work to be done to improve the quality of healthcare for transition patients.
Search for other papers by Małgorzata Więcek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jakub Gawlik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zuzanna Nowak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aneta Gawlik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Loss of fertility is one of the most important concerns facing Turner syndrome (TS) patients as they transition into adult health care. Due to the limited and rapidly decreasing ovarian reserve, many TS patients require fertility preservation (FP) techniques to preserve their reproductive potential until they are ready to pursue procreation. One has to also remember about the additional risks connected with pregnancy in TS patients. In order to determine the optimal time for introducing FP techniques and decrease the chance of an unnecessary intervention, markers and procedures assessing ovarian reserve have been developed. The exposure to potential cardiovascular complications should be determined before FP to avoid unnecessary procedures in patients with potential contraindications to pregnancy. The aim of the present review is to answer the following three questions important for successful preservation of fertility and safe pregnancy in TS: which markers of ovarian reserve should be used as selection criteria for FP? Which methods of FP are the safest and most effective? Are there any cardiovascular contraindications to FP? For each of those questions, separate literature searches have been conducted. A total of 86 articles have been included in this review: 34 for the first question, 35 for the second, and 17 for the third. Ovarian reserve markers and cardiovascular contraindications to pregnancy should be established before FP; hoverer, there are no unambiguous indicators as to which patients should be disqualified from the FP and more evidence is needed in this subject.
Search for other papers by Lukas Plachy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lenka Petruzelkova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Petra Dusatkova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klara Maratova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dana Zemkova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lenka Elblova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vit Neuman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stanislava Kolouskova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Barbora Obermannova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Snajderova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zdenek Sumnik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Lebl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stepanka Pruhova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Familial short stature (FSS) describes vertically transmitted growth disorders. Traditionally, polygenic inheritance is presumed, but monogenic inheritance seems to occur more frequently than expected. Clinical predictors of monogenic FSS have not been elucidated. The aim of the study was to identify the monogenic etiology and its clinical predictors in FSS children. Of 747 patients treated with growth hormone (GH) in our center, 95 with FSS met the inclusion criteria (pretreatment height ≤−2 SD in child and his/her shorter parent); secondary short stature and Turner/Prader–Willi syndrome were excluded criteria. Genetic etiology was known in 11/95 children before the study, remaining 84 were examined by next-generation sequencing. The results were evaluated by American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Nonparametric tests evaluated differences between monogenic and non-monogenic FSS, an ROC curve estimated quantitative cutoffs for the predictors. Monogenic FSS was confirmed in 36/95 (38%) children. Of these, 29 (81%) carried a causative genetic variant affecting the growth plate, 4 (11%) a variant affecting GH–insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) axis and 3 (8%) a variant in miscellaneous genes. Lower shorter parent’s height (P = 0.015) and less delayed bone age (BA) before GH treatment (P = 0.026) predicted monogenic FSS. In children with BA delayed less than 0.4 years and with shorter parent’s heights ≤−2.4 SD, monogenic FSS was revealed in 13/16 (81%) cases. To conclude, in FSS children treated with GH, a monogenic etiology is frequent, and gene variants affecting the growth plate are the most common. Shorter parent’s height and BA are clinical predictors of monogenic FSS.
Search for other papers by Henrik H Thomsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Holger J Møller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Trolle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristian A Groth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Skakkebæk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anders Bojesen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Høst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Medical Research Laboratories, Departments of Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Genetics, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Clinical Institute, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Search for other papers by Claus H Gravholt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Soluble CD163 (sCD163) is a novel marker linked to states of low-grade inflammation such as diabetes, obesity, liver disease, and atherosclerosis, all prevalent in subjects with Turner syndrome (TS) and Klinefelter syndrome (KS). We aimed to assess the levels of sCD163 and the regulation of sCD163 in regards to treatment with sex hormone therapy in males with and without KS and females with and without TS. Males with KS (n=70) and age-matched controls (n=71) participating in a cross-sectional study and 12 healthy males from an experimental hypogonadism study. Females with TS (n=8) and healthy age-matched controls (n=8) participating in a randomized crossover trial. The intervention comprised of treatment with sex steroids. Males with KS had higher levels of sCD163 compared with controls (1.75 (0.47–6.90) and 1.36 (0.77–3.11) respectively, P<0.001) and the levels correlated to plasma testosterone (r=−0.31, P<0.01), BMI (r=0.42, P<0.001), and homeostasis model of assessment insulin resistance (r=0.46, P<0.001). Treatment with testosterone did not significantly lower sCD163. Females with TS not receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT) had higher levels of sCD163 than those of their age-matched healthy controls (1.38±0.44 vs 0.91±0.40, P=0.04). HRT and oral contraceptive therapy decreased sCD163 in TS by 22% (1.07±0.30) and in controls by 39% (0.55±0.36), with significance in both groups (P=0.01 and P=0.04). We conclude that levels of sCD163 correlate with endogenous testosterone in KS and are higher in KS subjects compared with controls, but treatment did not significantly lower levels. Both endogenous and exogenous estradiol in TS was associated with lower levels of sCD163.
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Marie Lindhardt Ljubicic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Trine Holm Johannsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Margit Bistrup Fischer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Emmie N Upners in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Alexander S Busch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Katharina M Main in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Anna-Maria Andersson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Casper P Hagen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Anders Juul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The ratio between luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has previously been described as an excellent marker of sex in healthy infants. However, LH/FSH remains not fully described in patients with differences of sex development (DSD). The aim was therefore to describe LH/FSH in infants with DSD. This was a retrospective study of DSD patients, all aged 0–1.2 years. In total, 87 infants with DSD and at least one serum sample per infant were included. Longitudinal samples from single patients were included whenever possible. Serum LH/FSH ratios in these patients were plotted against recently published age-related and sex-dimorphic cutoffs. Overall, LH/FSH sometimes corresponded to assigned sex without any obvious pattern in terms of diagnoses. LH/FSH corresponded to the biological sex in all patients with Turner or Klinefelter syndrome. In patients with 46,XX or 46,XY DSD (except congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)), the ratios did not correspond to the assigned sex in all cases and were interchangeably within the male and female range. In patients with CAH, the ratio corresponded to biological sex (based on sex chromosomes) in some cases but also ranged across the cutoffs. In the 15 patients with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism, the LH/FSH ratios corresponded to the assigned sex in all cases (12 were raised as males, 3 as females) and at all time points in cases with multiple sampling. While this study describes LH/FSH in infants with DSD, the exact clinical role of the ratio in the management of these patients remains to be further elucidated.
