Search for other papers by L Bahler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H J Verberne in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Brakema in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Tepaske in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Booij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J B Hoekstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Holleman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Power analysis Power calculation
Search for other papers by Mohammed S Albreiki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benita Middleton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shelagh M Hampton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
towards the lights ( n = 221; DL 1.21 ± 0.13, BL 552.7 ± 16; mean ± s.e.m. ). Spectral composition of the light source was measured using a R203 power radiometer at horizontal (DL 0.001 w/m 2 , BL 0.98 w/m 2 ) and vertical level (DL 0.0008 w/m 2 , BL 0
Search for other papers by Nandini Shankara Narayana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lam P Ly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Veena Jayadev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carolyn Fennell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sasha Savkovic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ann J Conway in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David J Handelsman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
comprising age, measures of body size or physique, serum hormones, and a subject term as a random variable using restricted maximum likelihood with a one-term autoregressive covariance structure. The relative explanatory power of different models was
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Signe Frøssing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Malin Nylander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Caroline Kistorp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Sven O Skouby in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jens Faber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
study ( 24 ) and detailed information on design has previously been reported ( 21 ). Statistical analyses Change from baseline in the MR-proADM level was a secondary endpoint in the LIPT study. Power analysis performed on the primary endpoint
Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO Onlus), Florence, Italy
Search for other papers by Maria Luisa Brandi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefania Bandinelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Teresa Iantomasi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesca Giusti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eleonora Talluri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giovanna Sini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fabrizio Nannipieri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Santina Battaglia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Riccardo Giusti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colin Gerard Egan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Ferrucci in
Google Scholar
PubMed
characteristic curve (ROC) analysis (expressed as area under the curve; AUC, odds ratio (OR) and respective 95% CIs) was used to assess the predictive power of BPA levels to identify individuals having deficient levels of 25(OH)D (i.e. <20 ng/mL) ( 21 ). A P
Search for other papers by Xiaobing Lu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jiang Yue in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Qianjing Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shengyun He in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ying Dong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ming Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yicheng Qi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Minglan Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wang Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hua Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Qing Lu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jing Ma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS software (version 26.0). G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7; Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) was used to calculate the power (1 − β) of the study. The type of
Search for other papers by Changwei Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jingwen Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuanyuan Wan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiaona Xia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jian Pan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei Gu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mei Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
power and sample size calculators ( http://www.powerandsamplesize.com/ ). Based on the previous study ( 11 ), we estimated the sample size for our study. If the power equaled 0.9, the minimum sample size was about 42. Our study met the minimum sample
Search for other papers by Mengting Yin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Qianhui Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Qingzhong Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yong He in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Haolan Song in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xin Nie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guixing Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, parathyroid hormone. The diagnostic power for the Ca/P ratio We analyzed the diagnostic performance of the Ca/P ratio using ROCs. The cut-off point was calculated using Youden’s index (sensitivity + specificity − 1). The ROC curve showed that
Department of Endocrinology, Department of Public Health, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, P O Box 3250 Sluppen, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Bjørn O Åsvold in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Department of Public Health, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, P O Box 3250 Sluppen, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Valdemar Grill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ketil Thorstensen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology, Department of Public Health, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, P O Box 3250 Sluppen, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
Search for other papers by Marit R Bjørgaas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
used fractional polynomial regression to assess the association between dexamethasone and cortisol levels, both across the entire dexamethasone range and separately among people with dexamethasone >5.0 nmol/l. We only allowed one power term in the
Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University & University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Ann-Cathrin Koschker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Bodo Warrings in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Caroline Morbach in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florian Seyfried in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicole Rickert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pius Jung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Geier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ulrich Dischinger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maike Krauthausen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin J Herrmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Christine Stier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Stefan Frantz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Uwe Malzahn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Stefan Störk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University & University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Martin Fassnacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by the WAS Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
at the time points indicated in Supplementary Table 2. For the documentation of changes in obesity-related conditions, we applied definitions given in Supplementary Table 3. Sample size calculation, power analysis, and adaptation of the