Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for :
- Abstract: adrenarche x
- Abstract: amenorrhoea x
- Abstract: fertility x
- Abstract: Hypogonadism x
- Abstract: infertility x
- Abstract: Kallmann x
- Abstract: Klinefelter x
- Abstract: menarche x
- Abstract: menopause x
- Abstract: puberty x
- Abstract: testes x
- Abstract: transsexual x
- Abstract: Turner x
- Abstract: ovary x
- Abstract: follicles x
- Hormones and Cancer x
Search for other papers by Eleftherios E Deiktakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eleftheria Ieronymaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Zarén in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnes Hagsund in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elin Wirestrand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johan Malm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christos Tsatsanis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Imperial College London, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, London, UK
Search for other papers by Ilpo T Huhtaniemi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Malmö University Hospital, Reproductive Medicine Center, Malmö, Sweden
Search for other papers by Aleksander Giwercman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yvonne Lundberg Giwercman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
During androgen ablation in prostate cancer by the standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist treatment, only luteinizing hormone (LH) is permanently suppressed while circulating follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) rebounds. We explored direct prostatic effects of add-back FSH, after androgen ablation with GnRH antagonist, permanently suppressing both gonadotropins.
Methods
The effects of recombinant human (rFSH) were examined in mice treated with vehicle (controls), GnRH antagonist degarelix (dgx), dgx + rFSH, dgx + flutamide, or dgx + rFSH + flutamide for 4 weeks. Prostates and testes size and expression of prostate-specific and/or androgen-responsive genes were measured. Additionally, 33 young men underwent dgx-treatment. Seventeen were supplemented with rFSH (weeks 1–5), and all with testosterone (weeks 4–5). Testosterone, gondotropins, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and inhibin B were measured.
Results
In dgx and dgx + flutamide treated mice, prostate weight/body weight was 91% lower than in controls, but 41 and 11%, respectively, was regained by rFSH treatment (P = 0.02). The levels of seminal vesicle secretion 6, Pbsn, Nkx3.1, beta-microseminoprotein, and inhibin b were elevated in dgx + rFSH-treated animals compared with only dgx treated (all P < 0.05). In men, serum inhibin B rose after dgx treatment but was subsequently suppressed by testosterone. rFSH add-back had no effect on PSA levels.
Conclusions
These data provide novel evidence for the direct effects of FSH on prostate size and gene expression in chemically castrated mice. However, in chemically castrated men, FSH had no effect on PSA production. Whether FSH effects on the prostate in humans also require suppression of the residual adrenal-derived androgens and/or a longer period of rFSH stimulation, remains to be explored.
Search for other papers by Jiaxin Luo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Weili Yin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Qiuxia Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juqing Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pan Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuanna Ling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jing Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhen Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liqin Pan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yanying Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei Ouyang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Huijuan Feng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
To evaluate the locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS) of bone metastatic lesions from differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after radioiodine therapy (RAIT) and to define its influencing factors, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 89 patients with bone metastases from DTC who received RAIT in our department over a 17-year period. The median follow-up time was calculated using the reverse Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model were performed in the analysis of prognostic indicators for LPFS. In this research, the median follow-up time for all patients was 47 (95% CI, 35.752–58.248) months, and that for patients with no progression was 42 months. The longest follow-up time was 109 months. The median LPFS time was 58 (95% CI, 32.602–83.398) months, and the 3- and 5-year LPFS probabilities were 57.8 and 45.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed bone structural changes as an independent risk factor for LPFS (P= 0.004; hazard ratio, 49.216; 95% CI, 3.558–680.704). Furthermore, the non–total-lesion uptake subgroup presented a worse LPFS than the total-lesion uptake subgroup in patients with structural bone lesions (P = 0.027). RAIT can improve the LPFS of radioiodine-avid bone metastases from DTC, especially those without bone structural changes.
Search for other papers by Margarida Brito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susana Prazeres in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Malheiros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Fulvestrant resembles estradiol in its structure. Reports have been published concerning fulvestrant measured as estradiol by the immunoassays. This may induce falsely elevated estradiol results and wrongly impact medical decisions. Our aim was to confirm the interference of fulvestrant on estradiol concentration and test a method to identify the false results.
Methods
Four serum samples with low estradiol levels were spiked with fulvestrant at various concentrations. Estradiol was then measured directly on serum (Dir), after a 1:5 dilution (Dil), and a ratio Dil/Dir was estimated. On the second part of the study, estradiol results (Dir, Dil and ratio Dil/Dir) from 14 women treated with fulvestrant were analysed, as well as from 14 patients not under this treatment.
Results
The addition of exogenous fulvestrant to the serum samples induced a gradual rise on estradiol concentration with a mean ratio for the Dil/Dir samples of 2.1 ± 0.4 (range 1.7–2.9). Patients on fulvestrant treatment experienced a mean ratio for the Dil/Dir estradiol sample of 2.4 ± 0.4 (range 1.6–3.0). In the control group, a mean estradiol ratio Dil/Dir of 1.1 ± 0.1 was observed (range 0.8–1.3). No correlation between the number of days after fulvestrant injection and estradiol result (r = 0.531) was observed.
Conclusion
Our study confirmed the interference of fulvestrant in the estradiol measurement by immunoassay. When fulvestrant was present, the estradiol ratio for Dil/Dir sample was about 2. In the control group, the ratio was around 1. The estradiol Dil/Dir ratio is a simple tool which can be used to identify fulvestrant false immunoassay estradiol results.
Search for other papers by Enrique Pedernera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Flavia Morales-Vásquez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María J Gómora in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miguel A Almaraz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad La Salle, Posgrado de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Ciudad de México, México
Search for other papers by Esteban Mena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Delia Pérez-Montiel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth Rendon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Horacio López-Basave in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juan Maldonado-Cubas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carmen Méndez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The incidence of ovarian cancer has been epidemiologically related to female reproductive events and hormone replacement therapy after menopause. This highlights the importance of evaluating the role of sexual steroid hormones in ovarian cancer by the expression of enzymes related to steroid hormone biosynthesis in the tumor cells. This study was aimed to evaluate the presence of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17β-HSD1), aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in the tumor cells and their association with the overall survival in 111 patients diagnosed with primary ovarian tumors. Positive immunoreactivity for 17β-HSD1 was observed in 74% of the tumors. In the same samples, aromatase and ERα revealed 66% and 47% positivity, respectively. No association was observed of 17β-HSD1 expression with the histological subtypes and clinical stages of the tumor. The overall survival of patients was improved in 17β-HSD1-positive group in Kaplan–Meier analysis (P = 0.028), and 17β-HSD1 expression had a protective effect from multivariate proportional regression evaluation (HR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.24–0.9; P = 0.040). The improved survival was observed in serous epithelial tumors but not in nonserous ovarian tumors. The expression of 17β-HSD1 in the cells of the serous epithelial ovarian tumors was associated with an improved overall survival, whereas aromatase and ERα were not related to a better survival. The evaluation of hazard risk factors demonstrated that age and clinical stage showed worse prognosis, and 17β-HSD1 expression displayed a protective effect with a better survival outcome in patients of epithelial ovarian tumors.
